Wolf, Steven Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Wolf, Steven Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Ponak, Allen Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Ponak, Allen Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Wood, Jeanne Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Wood, Jeanne Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Francis, Edna Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Francis, Edna Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Laporte, Phillip Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Laporte, Phillip Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Strongin, Andrew Arbitration Chart,
2018
Notre Dame Law School
Strongin, Andrew Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Brogan, Margaret Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Brogan, Margaret Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Kagel, John Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Kagel, John Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Neumeier, Elizabeth Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Neumeier, Elizabeth Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Skonier, John Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Skonier, John Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Burstein, Mark Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Burstein, Mark Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Herzog, Robert Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Herzog, Robert Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Oldham, James Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Oldham, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
De Treux, Walt Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
De Treux, Walt Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Kendellen, Gary Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Kendellen, Gary Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Archer, Dennis Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Archer, Dennis Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Brent, Dan Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Brent, Dan Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Darby, James Arbitration Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
Darby, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Arbitrator Charts
No abstract provided.
Is The Die Cast? Indian Casino Gambling In Maine,
2018
University of Maine School of Law
Is The Die Cast? Indian Casino Gambling In Maine, Sharon M. Wheeler
Maine Law Review
Gambling is the fastest-growing industry in America, earning profits of $45 billion each year. Although gambling on Indian reservations is a $6 billion business, the perception of Indian wealth from gambling revenues is far from reality. Gambling operations provide economic support for only one percent of Indians. Yet, for those who have reaped the high rewards, Indian gambling has become a staple of modern tribal economics. Complex legal issues surround Indian gambling, making it an important and often contentious part of many tribal-state relationships. Maine law prohibits many gambling activities. The Legislature, however, has carved out an exception for federally …
Rejecting The De Minimis Defense To Infringement Of Sound Recording Copyrights,
2018
University of Notre Dame Law School
Rejecting The De Minimis Defense To Infringement Of Sound Recording Copyrights, Michael G. Kubik
Notre Dame Law Review
Part I of this Note examines the history of sound recording copyrights, the role of digital sampling in the music industry, and the basic principles and functions of the de minimis defense. Part II carefully dissects the Bridgeport and VMG opinions. Part III then considers the merits of each opinion and concludes that Bridgeport reached the correct conclusion. This argument rests on the statutory scheme of Title 17 of the U.S. Code and the plain text of its applicable provisions, bolstered by their legislative history, giving life to a unique statutory creature that thrives in a manner inconsistent with traditional …
