Special-Education Law In Mexico And The United States,
2015
University of Dayton
Special-Education Law In Mexico And The United States, Charles J. Russo, Ricardo Lozano
Educational Leadership Faculty Publications
The challenges of meeting the requirements of students with special needs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and other laws are a particularly timely topic, as large numbers of native Spanish-speaking students move into the United States.
Against that backdrop, this article reviews the laws for special education in Mexico and the United States. The focus on the laws in Mexico stems from the fact that many students cross the border daily to attend public schools in the United States, and because Mexico has many laws in place dealing with special education. We offer school district leaders a comparative …
Cracking Open The Classroom Door: Developing A First Amendment Standard For Curricular Speech,
2015
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Cracking Open The Classroom Door: Developing A First Amendment Standard For Curricular Speech, Nicholas K. Tygesson
Northwestern University Law Review
Around this country, courts have found that the discharge of public school teachers for their classroom speech does not implicate the First Amendment. Others have protected this speech, but only by importing analytical approaches from other areas of law ill suited to the unique interests at play in America’s public schools. The resulting patchwork of doctrinal approaches provides little clarity for courts and only illusory protection for teachers. This Note will start from scratch, examining the first principles at play in public school classrooms and tailoring a First Amendment approach to respect the needs of government, teachers, and students. When …
Quality Counts 2015,
2015
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Quality Counts 2015, Sarah C. Mckenzie, Gary W. Ritter
Policy Briefs
In an attempt to gauge the educational progress of the nation and each state, Education Week has published state report cards since 1997 in its annual Quality Counts series. The 19 th annual report - Quality Counts 2015 - was released in January. Overall, Arkansas received an grade of C– and was ranked 36th among the 50 states. This policy brief examines Arkansas’ rank in each category of the report as well as the quality of the report itself.
Opposing Viewpoints: Preparing Students, Teachers, And The Community For School Shootings: Saving Lives With Active Shooter Simulations,
2015
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Opposing Viewpoints: Preparing Students, Teachers, And The Community For School Shootings: Saving Lives With Active Shooter Simulations, Michael Gubiotti
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Silver Linings Casebook: How Vergara’S Backers May Lose By Winning,
2015
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Silver Linings Casebook: How Vergara’S Backers May Lose By Winning, Kevin G. Welner
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
The Civil Rights Approach To Campus Sexual Violence,
2015
Wayne State University
The Civil Rights Approach To Campus Sexual Violence, Nancy Chi Cantalupo
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Teen Pregnancy In Charter Schools: Pregnancy Discrimination Challenges Under The Equal Protection Clause And Title Ix,
2015
Emory University School of Law
Teen Pregnancy In Charter Schools: Pregnancy Discrimination Challenges Under The Equal Protection Clause And Title Ix, Kaylee Niemasik
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
Until three years ago, a policy at Delhi Charter School in Louisiana required that any pregnant student be effectively expelled. A pregnant sixteen-year-old student’s expulsion caught the attention of national media in 2012. The ACLU sued and the school quickly rescinded the policy. Although the policy was revoked, the un-adjudicated nature of the resolution leaves teen girls at the school and nationwide without any final court order to protect them against the (re)enactment of similar discriminatory policies. This Article analyzes the Delhi Charter School policy in order to make three related arguments. First, the Court should adopt a rebuttable presumption …
School Shooting Simulations: At What Point Does Preparation Become More Harmful Than Helpful?,
2015
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
School Shooting Simulations: At What Point Does Preparation Become More Harmful Than Helpful?, Lauren Rygg
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Strained Dynamic Of The Least Restrictive Environment Concept In The Idea,
2015
Texas A&M University Kingsville.
The Strained Dynamic Of The Least Restrictive Environment Concept In The Idea, Bonnie Spiro Schinagle, Marilyn J. Bartlett
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Around The World: America Ahead Of The Curve With Discussion Around Least Restrictive Environment: Education Rights For Children With Disabilities Around The World,
2015
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Around The World: America Ahead Of The Curve With Discussion Around Least Restrictive Environment: Education Rights For Children With Disabilities Around The World, Elise Harmening
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Spotlight On: School Violence Prevention,
2015
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Spotlight On: School Violence Prevention, Paige Steffen
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Instead Of Suspension: Alternative Strategies For Effective School Discipline,
2015
Duke Law School
Instead Of Suspension: Alternative Strategies For Effective School Discipline, Jenni Owen, Jane Wettach, Katie Claire Hoffman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Lsac Data Reveals That Black/White Multiracials Outscore All Blacks On Lsat By Wide Margins,
2015
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Lsac Data Reveals That Black/White Multiracials Outscore All Blacks On Lsat By Wide Margins, Kevin D. Brown
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Northwestern Football And College Athletes: Be Careful What You Wish For, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 655 (2015),
2015
UIC School of Law
Northwestern Football And College Athletes: Be Careful What You Wish For, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 655 (2015), Patrick Johnston
UIC Law Review
This comment analyzes the arguments the Northwestern University football team have made to the NLRB and discuss potential adverse tax consequences to the Players as a result of those arguments.
Biting The Bullet: Why The Gun Free Schools Act Must Be Repealed To Protect Student Speech, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (2015),
2015
UIC School of Law
Biting The Bullet: Why The Gun Free Schools Act Must Be Repealed To Protect Student Speech, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (2015), Aaron Brand
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cocktails On Campus: Are Libations A Liability?,
2015
Barry University
Cocktails On Campus: Are Libations A Liability?, Susan S. Bendlin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
“Jim Crowing” Plyler V. Doe: The Resegregation Of Undocumented Students In American Higher Education Through Discriminatory State Tuition And Fee Legislation,
2015
Indiana University Bloomington
“Jim Crowing” Plyler V. Doe: The Resegregation Of Undocumented Students In American Higher Education Through Discriminatory State Tuition And Fee Legislation, David H.K. Nguyen, Zelideh R. Martinez Hoy
Cleveland State Law Review
This law review article examines the re-segregation of undocumented students in education, more specifically, re-segregation through state laws and policies impacting their attendance at American colleges and universities. Under no fault of their own, undocumented students are marginalized even further after graduating from high school, since they are not afforded the same benefits as their peers to attend college. This article explores the current landscape of these laws and policies after providing background on Plyler v. Doe and state and federal attempts to challenge education for undocumented students.
Ratings Fetishism,
2015
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Ratings Fetishism, Leslie Yalof Garfield
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The obsession with increasing the reputational rankings of American colleges and universities more detrimentally impacts race-based admissions policies than does Supreme Court doctrine. It is no secret that many schools inflate, misleadingly report, or falsify records in order to pander to rankings systems like U.S. News and World Report (“U.S. News”). These systems weigh a school’s mean standardized test scores (SAT and/or ACT) heavily as one of the factors for assigning a rank. Thus, the incentive among schools playing the ratings game is to admit students with the highest SAT scores. But, if one agrees with the data that underrepresented …
Disrupting Education Federalism,
2015
University of Richmond
Disrupting Education Federalism, Kimberly J. Robinson
Law Faculty Publications
The ongoing expansion of federal influence over education in the United States provides a particularly salient time to consider how education federalism should be structured to achieve the nation's education goals. One ofthe nation's unfulfilled and yet essential education goals is to ensure that all students receive equal access to an excellent education. A variety of scholars and, most recently, the federal Equity and Excellence Commission have offered proposals for advancing this goal. By building on this growing momentum for reform,I argue that disrupting the nation's longstanding approach to education federalism-which I define as the balance of power between federal, …
Judges Are Not ‘Super-Referees’: Why A Qualified Statutory Exemption To The Sherman Act Is Needed To Reform The Ncaa And Its Exploitive Amateur Model, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2015),
2015
UIC School of Law
Judges Are Not ‘Super-Referees’: Why A Qualified Statutory Exemption To The Sherman Act Is Needed To Reform The Ncaa And Its Exploitive Amateur Model, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2015), Christopher Sweeney
UIC Law Review
This Comment will analyze the historical application of antitrust laws to the rules and regulations of the NCAA and argue that, in light of a recent shift in judicial treatment, the next round of antitrust litigation threatens to destroy the entire NCAA model.
