Table Of Contents,
2016
University of South Carolina
Kids And Rules: Challenging Individualization In Special Education,
2016
University of South Carolina
Kids And Rules: Challenging Individualization In Special Education, Karen Syma Czapanskiy
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Primary & Secondary Education - Recent Cases And Commentary,
2016
University of South Carolina
Primary & Secondary Education - Recent Cases And Commentary
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Farewell To Dixie: California's Attempt To Eliminate The Confederacy From Public Schools,
2016
University of South Carolina
Farewell To Dixie: California's Attempt To Eliminate The Confederacy From Public Schools, James Shockley
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Developing Prevention-Oriented Discipline Codes Of Conduct,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, Law School
Developing Prevention-Oriented Discipline Codes Of Conduct, Miranda Johnson, Pamela A. Fenning
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Special-Education Litigation: An Empirical Analysis Of North Carolina's First Tier,
2016
Campbell University School of Law
Special-Education Litigation: An Empirical Analysis Of North Carolina's First Tier, Lisa Lukasik
Scholarly Works
Special-education litigation begins, under the terms of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), with an “impartial due process” proceeding. States enjoy limited discretion to establish the manner by which they will effectuate this process. Variations in implementation exist. Most states offer a “single-tiered” process, and eight offer a “two-tiered” proceeding.
National debate about the effectiveness of these administrative proceedings has increased over the last decade. One contested question is whether a single-tiered or two-tiered administrative process better serves the objectives of the Act.
Meaningful empirical examination of these specialized proceedings has begun to inform this debate, but significant research …
Evading The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Schools (K-12) And The Regulation Of Cyberbullying,
2016
SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
Evading The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Schools (K-12) And The Regulation Of Cyberbullying, Philip Lee
Utah Law Review
Cyberbullying has received increasing societal attention in the aftermath of the tragic suicides of some of its youngest and most vulnerable victims. In this Article, I have argued that cyberbullying is so harmful, in and of itself, that it should be afforded diminished First Amendment protections. I have also advocated for a narrow definition of cyberbullying that incorporates the three elements of the prevailing social scientists’ definition of “bullying” as it relates to cyberbullying: (1) intent to harm; (2) repetition; and (3) power imbalance between cyberbully and victim.
Florida's Decision To Not Decide: Leaving The Neediest Students Without A Voice,
2016
Nova Southeastern University
Florida's Decision To Not Decide: Leaving The Neediest Students Without A Voice
Nova Law Review
Since the seminal case, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, School finance suits have been relegated to a state issue.
Effects Of The Illinois Budget Crisis On Home-Based Childcare Businesses,
2016
Governors State University
Effects Of The Illinois Budget Crisis On Home-Based Childcare Businesses, Okeycha Pettigrew
All Capstone Projects
There are over 800,000 children in Illinois that need to be placed in early learning programs. Many programs are closing due to the lack of financial support from government programs that provide financial assistance to parents who cannot afford to pay for childcare. The budget crisis that Illinois is currently experiencing has caused a decrease in funding early childhood education, and has cut many programs that are beneficial to home-based childcare businesses. What is happening to the children and the families that depend on childcare assistance? How does that affect the economy? What will happen to the communities that need …
Pregnancy Discrimination Under Tide Ix: Compliance Concerns At Law Schools,
2016
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Pregnancy Discrimination Under Tide Ix: Compliance Concerns At Law Schools, Liani Balasuriya
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the protection of pregnant law students under Title IX and highlights significant gaps in compliance and enforcement within law schools. Despite Title IX's prohibition of pregnancy discrimination, the lack of data and inconsistent policies at law schools raise concerns about the adequacy of protections for pregnant students. The analysis advocates for improved data collection, clearer policies, and stronger accountability measures to ensure equitable treatment of pregnant law students.
Homeschooling: Choosing Parental Rights Over Children's Interests,
2016
Emory University School of Law
Homeschooling: Choosing Parental Rights Over Children's Interests, Martha Fineman, George B. Shepherd
University of Baltimore Law Review
Homeschooling, the most extreme form of privatization of education, often eliminates the possibility of the child gaining the resources essential for success in adult life. It sacrifices the interests of the child to the interests of the parents, allowing them to control and isolate the child’s development. In addition, homeschooling frustrates the state’s legitimate interest in the child’s receiving a sound, diverse education, so that the child can achieve her potential as a productive employee and as a constructive participant in civic life. This Article uses vulnerability theory as a heuristic frame both to reexamine the dominant rhetoric of parental …
Charting The Course: Charter School Exploration In Virginia,
2016
University of Richmond
Charting The Course: Charter School Exploration In Virginia, Katherine E. Lehnen
Law Student Publications
This comment reviews the background and status of the charter school movement in Part I and addresses legal challenges charters face in Part II. Part III provides an overview of Virginia's charter school law, and Part IV analyzes how the legislature can improve that law to foster charter school exploration in the Commonwealth.
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Everett Et Al V. Pitt County School (Everett I And Ii) And The Ominous Future Of Federal Court Desegregation Orders,
2016
FAMU College of Law
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Everett Et Al V. Pitt County School (Everett I And Ii) And The Ominous Future Of Federal Court Desegregation Orders, Mark Dorosin
Journal Publications
During the brief zenith of school desegregation litigation in the late 1960s and early 1970s, hundreds of school districts across the nation, and particularly across the South, were found liable for intentional racial discrimination and became subject to federal court supervision of approved plans to achieve integration. The period of aggressive enforcement was short-lived however, and by the mid-1970s, and accelerating through the 1980s and 1990s, an increasingly conservative Supreme Court and presidential administrations first slowed the scope and intensity of school integration, and then actively pushed to end judicial enforcement and oversight of existing desegregation cases. This was true …
Centering Education In The Next Great Copyright Act: A Response To Professor Jaszi,
2016
FAMU College of Law
Centering Education In The Next Great Copyright Act: A Response To Professor Jaszi, Deidre Keller
Journal Publications
Rather, as the Georgia State decisions exemplify, educators and educational institutions are treated like every other unlicensed user of copyrighted materials; they are expected to prove that each use is a fair use firmly within the confines of existing fair use jurisprudence. Jaszi further asserts that endeavoring to change the copy-right statute is a lost cause and offers, as the least bad alternative, the possibility of educators articulating their uses as transformative and, therefore, well within the recognized parameters of the fair use doctrine. This piece responds to Professor Jaszi’s article. Part II briefly analyzes the Georgia State decisions out …
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships,
2016
Brooklyn Law School
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships, Nicole M. Klinger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
This Note addresses the current ambiguity in the law regarding if unpaid interns are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Note explores relevant case law throughout the circuit courts, but primarily focuses on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures. It argues that the primary benefits test created by the Second Circuit in Glatt does not adequately protect unpaid interns nor does it inform employers of the standards they need to meet in order to adopt legal unpaid internship programs. Instead, courts should adopt a clearer, more rigid test that finds an intern not …
Resolving Multicultural Family Disputes In New York: A Clash Of Courts And Cultures,
2016
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Resolving Multicultural Family Disputes In New York: A Clash Of Courts And Cultures, Alla Roytberg
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
In this Article, I will discuss my experiences with litigated cases involving multi-cultural families. I will then analyze how issues of cultural sensitivity can be addressed and honored during a mediation between the parties, with the help of an experienced, culturally sensitive mediator.
Fashioning Children: Gender Restrictive Dress Codes As An Entry Point For The Tans School To Prison Pipeline,
2016
American University Washington College of Law
Fashioning Children: Gender Restrictive Dress Codes As An Entry Point For The Tans School To Prison Pipeline, Deanna J. Glickman
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Expanding The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Schools (K-12) And The Regulation Of Cyberbullying,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
Expanding The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Schools (K-12) And The Regulation Of Cyberbullying, Philip Lee
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In a tragic case that received international attention, 15-year-old Phoebe Prince killed herself after being bullied—both physically and online—by some of her classmates. Phoebe had moved to Massachusetts from a small town in Ireland, enrolling as a freshman at South Hadley High School. After a brief relationship with a popular boy in the senior class, the taunting by her classmates began. Some students called her an “Irish slut” and a “whore,” knocked things out of her hands, and sent her threatening texts. Some of the students used Facebook and Twitter to speak badly about her. Phoebe suffered this treatment …
Time To Pay College Athletes? Why The O'Bannon Decision Makes Pay-For-Play Ripe For Mediation,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Time To Pay College Athletes? Why The O'Bannon Decision Makes Pay-For-Play Ripe For Mediation, Andrew Steckler
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Between the mounting pressure of public opinion, and continuing litigation in which various plaintiffs are seeking to take advantage of the player-friendly language in O'Bannon, the power dynamic in college athletics is shifting back towards the players. The previously uneven playing field is leveling. This Note examines how to inject mediation into the "pay-for-play" debate to better serve the interests of the NCAA, the major conferences (Big 10, SEC, ACC, Big 12, and Pac-12), and the student-athletes in the wake of O'Bannon. While litigation was necessary to start the process, ultimately, it will be up to the NCAA …
"Boys Will Be Boys, And Girls Will Get Raped": How Public School Dress Codes Foster Modern Day Rape Culture,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
"Boys Will Be Boys, And Girls Will Get Raped": How Public School Dress Codes Foster Modern Day Rape Culture, Stephan Wah
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that public school dress codes perpetuate rape culture by disproportionately targeting female students, reinforcing patriarchal norms, and contributing to gender-based discrimination. These dress codes, often justified as preventing distractions, instead shame girls and place the responsibility of boys' behavior on them, thereby normalizing the objectification of women and supporting systemic sexism.
