Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez

Seattle University Law Review

The Roberts Court holds a well-earned reputation for overturning Supreme Court precedent regardless of the long-standing nature of the case. The Roberts Court knows how to overrule precedent. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Court’s majority opinion never intimates that it overrules Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court’s leading opinion permitting race-based affirmative action in college admissions. Instead, the Roberts Court applied Grutter as authoritative to hold certain affirmative action programs entailing racial preferences violative of the Constitution. These programs did not provide an end point, nor did they require assessment, review, periodic expiration, or revision for greater …

Verses Turned To Verdicts: Ysl Rico Case Sets A High-Watermark For The Legal Pseudo-Censorship Of Rap Music, Nabil Yousfi

Seattle University Law Review

Whichever way you spin the record, rap music and courtrooms don’t mix. On one side, rap records are well known for their unapologetic lyrical composition, often expressing a blatant disregard for legal institutions and authorities. On the other, court records reflect a Van Gogh’s ear for rap music, frequently allowing rap lyrics—but not similar lyrics from other genres—to be used as criminal evidence against the defendants who authored them. Over the last thirty years, this immiscibility has engendered a legal landscape where prosecutors wield rap lyrics as potent instruments for criminal prosecution. In such cases, color-blind courts neglect that rap …

Due Process Shaped By The Present Instead Of The Past: The Needed Reinvigoration Of A Lawrence Vision Of Due Process, Azor Cole

Seattle University Law Review

The recognition of unenumerated rights, rights implied from the text of the constitution, is a political battlefield waged through law with profound implications for all Americans. Generally, there have been two prongs for an inquiry into an unenumerated constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment. One is to ask whether the right to be found is objectively deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition. The other is to ask whether the right to be found is fundamental to this Nation’s scheme of ordered liberty. The current Supreme Court has effectively done away with this present-day liberty analysis, saying it is …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

The Consumer’S Choice To Boycott, Agnes Bresee

Seattle University Law Review

In the wake of employees losing their jobs upon voicing their political opinions concerning Israel, Harvard and Columbia law students’ job offers being rescinded upon expressing support for Palestine, and the names and social media profiles of individuals who support Palestine being collected and listed on Canary Mission, such backlash may leave many Americans wondering what form of resistance to settler-colonialist apartheid is acceptable in the twenty-first century. Recently, the movement to collectively boycott brands like Starbucks, which sued its Worker’s Union for a tweet expressing support for Palestine; Disney, which donated money to Israel; and McDonald’s, where a location …

International Arbitration Of Sep Frand Royalties, Steven Pepe, Samuel Brenner, Michael Morales

Touro Law Review

Standard-essential patent royalty disputes have typically been litigated in U.S. federal district courts, but patent owners have recently started to file suit in courts across the globe, leading to issues of comity, anti-suit injunctions, and increased litigation costs. International arbitration provides a unique forum for parties to litigate these royalty disputes and avoid, or at least lessen the burden, of these issues. This Article explores the advantages and disadvantages of using international arbitration to resolve standard-essential patent royalty disputes.

Don't Kill The Baby! The Case For Ai In Arbitration, Michael J. Broyde, Yiyang Mei

Faculty Articles

Since the introduction of Generative AI (GenAI) in 2022, its ability to simulate human intelligence and generate content has sparked both enthusiasm and concern. While much of the criticism focuses on AI’s potential to perpetuate bias, create emotional dissonance, displace jobs, and raise ethical questions, these concerns often overlook the practical benefits of AI, particularly in legal contexts. This article examines the integration of AI into arbitration, arguing that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows parties to contractually choose AI-driven arbitration, despite traditional reservations.

This article makes three key contributions: (1) It shifts the focus from debates over AI’s personhood …

An Information Flow Model Of Online Mediation: Jeopardizing Privacy And Autonomy In The Shadow Of Innovation, Rachel Ringort, Ayelet Sela

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Online mediation has developed significantly over the past decade, and increasingly so following the COVID-19 pandemic. Online mediation platforms are now integrated into both private and public settings, enabling mediation through diverse means-from videoconferencing software to dedicated platforms that use various procedural and technological tools, including artificial intelligencepowered applications. The digital transformation of the mediation process introduces challenges and opportunities for mediators, parties, and mediation platforms, many of which stem from new digital datahandling practices. This article explores how such digital transformation of mediation impacts the parties' rights to self-determination and privacy. Recognizing that these rights derive from the parties' …

Comparing Joint Session And Caucus Outcomes: Factoring In Substantive Discussions And Case Characteristics, Roselle L. Wissler, Art Hinshaw

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Many of the traditional components of initial joint sessions occur less frequently today than they did historically and are more likely to take place during initial caucuses than during initial joint sessions. These changes in mediation practice lead to questions about whether initial joint sessions still provide the benefits historically attributed to them and whether initial caucuses now provide not only the benefits specifically ascribed to them but also the benefits typically associated with initial joint sessions. The presentArticle addresses these questions while taking into consideration differences in case and mediator characteristics as well as the extent of discussions in …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 25, Iss. 3

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 26 (2024–25)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 26, Iss. 1

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Civil Appeals Mediation Program 2023 Mediation Colloquy "Thinking 101" And Mediation

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Arbitral Reliance On "Precedent", Ariana R. Levinson

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We conclude that "precedent" may not be the most appropriate term for arbitrators' reliance on other awards. While the term "precedent" might be used loosely in the sense that any past event is a precedent for any future event, the doctrines of stare decisis, collateral estoppel, and res judicata do not apply in labor arbitration. Only if a contract explicitly states or is interpreted by arbitrators to require past awards between the same parties to bind them into the future until a change is negotiated to the contract will these doctrines be utilized by arbitrators. Much more often, including in …

Artificial Intelligence And Mediation Ethics, Zachary R. Calo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Artificial intelligence ("Al") presents many opportunities to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and accessibility of mediation. More than that, it has potential to transform the nature of how mediation is practiced and what mediation is. While Al might not yet play a significant role in many mediations, there is widespread recognition that the technology is disrupting many established dispute resolution practices. What mediation will look like on the other side is unclear, but it will not be the same.

Technology And Victims' Compensation Systems: The Brumadinho Experience, Diego Faleck

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The rupture of the B-I dam of the C6rrego do Feijio Mine, in Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, Brazil, owned by the company VALE S/A, which occurred on January 25, 2019, gave rise, from the point of view of civil liability, to a series of extrajudicial measures of socioeconomic reparation. These measures include the payment of emergency compensation to more than 100,000 people, and the implementation of an individual, optional, and voluntary compensation program for civil and labor claims, for the victims and their families. The compensation program was designed according to the principles and techniques of the evolving field of study …

What Mediation Romantics Can Learn From The Model T (Or Maybe The Chevrolet Trax), Nancy A. Welsh

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When mediation was reintroduced to the U.S. in the 1970s, it was infused with a democracy-and-self-determination-enhancing, social justice ethos. As the process has been very successfully institutionalized, however, these ambitions have been scaled backalthough, at least arguably, certain "mediative elements" have actually been adopted (or coopted) by other procedural innovations. Perhaps it is time for those of us frustrated with the evolution of mediation to reconcile ourselves to the reality and value of a "basic" model of mediation designed for the sole purpose of getting parties from dispute to settlement-in much the same way that the basic model of a …

The Efficacy Of Mandatory Mediation In Courts Of Limited Jurisdiction: A Case Study From The Missoula Justice Court, Paul F. Kirgis, Brock Flynn

Faculty Law Review Articles

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly mediation, has become an integral component of the judicial system, promising efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced litigant satisfaction. Courts of limited jurisdiction, which handle high volumes of landlord-tenant disputes, debt collection cases, and small claims, have increasingly adopted mandatory mediation programs to alleviate docket congestion and promote settlement. This article contributes to the growing body of research on mediation in courts of limited jurisdiction by analyzing case outcomes in the Justice Court for Missoula County, Montana. Through a review of public court records from 2019-2023, we examine settlement rates, compliance with mediated agreements, and the …

Special Challenges In The Execution Of Arbitral Awards In India In Public- Private Partnerships: A Trade Perspective, Srividhya Ragavan, Niraj Kumar Seth

National Law School of India Review

With around 47 million pending cases at various stages of Indian judiciary and one of the lowest levels of judges per million of population in the world, India’s arbitration regime presents a ray of hope for millions of Indians who face the prospect of justice being denied to them due to inordinate delays caused by a clogged judicial pipeline. The enactment of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was presented as a viable alternative to resolving commercial disputes in a timely manner. This paper uses a case study to discuss how arbitration in India has not fulfilled the timeliness promise …

An Exacerbated Power Imbalance: The Danger In Allowing Ai To Render Arbitral Awards In Employment Arbitration, Elizabeth G. Stein

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.