Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Multiple Proceedings And Abuse Of Procedure On Bri Disputes, Mariam Gotsiridze

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

This article argues that specific mechanisms and best practices should be adopted by different players in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) dispute resolution ecosystem to mitigate the risks of multiple proceedings and abuse of procedure. Specifically, (i) states should enhance their multilateral and bilateral treaty practices; (ii) arbitral institutions should enhance their arbitral rules as well as cooperate with each other; and (iii) states should direct more efforts to dispute prevention and amicable dispute settlement. This article will explain what these best practices and mechanisms are.

How Adr Can Combat The Rise In Antisemitism And Islamophobia On College Campuses, Cynthia Spitzer

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

Since the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel by the terrorist organization Hamas, there has been ongoing strife and protests throughout the world. Such turmoil notably coincides with a rise in hate crimes, antisemitism, and islamophobia, noticed not only on the streets of the United States, thousands of miles away from Israel, but also in the microcosm of college campuses.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution website on February 29, 2024. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Cjcr Publishes Volume 25, Issue 1 (Fall 2023), Jane Perov

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution—the country’s preeminent legal journal of arbitration, negotiation, mediation, settlement, and restorative justice—today published the web edition of Volume 25, Issue 1 (Fall 2023).

The print edition of the issue is forthcoming. This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution website on February 28, 2024. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

No Need To Reinvent The Wheel: The Positive Relationship Between Green Technology And Patent Enforcement, Addison S. Fowler

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Arbitration In Professional Sports: Is It Time To Move On?, Alessandra Makris

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

Arbitration clauses are extremely common in the contracts of athletes all over the world. However, with the recent focus on eliminating mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts, the question of whether professional sports leagues will start doing the same remains. In the world of professional sports, arbitration clauses can often be found within a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) between a players’ association and an owners’ group. Five major professional sports have arbitration clauses in their CBAs: Major League Baseball (“MLB”), National Basketball Association (“NBA”), National Football League (“NFL”), Major League Soccer (“MLS”) and National Hockey League (“NHL”). Typically, the clauses …

Crypto And Arbitration: The Perfect Pair, Jared Bond

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

While Cryptocurrency was once seen as the forefront of unique new investment opportunities, early 2022, known as the “Crypto Winter” saw a steep decline in cryptocurrency prices.[1] The fall of cryptocurrency led to an increase in crypto arbitration, with some cases just starting to reach the court system.[2] Due to the international nature of cryptocurrency and the unique challenges disputes present, many crypto businesses include arbitration clauses in their contracts.[3] While not yet clear how many of these issues will ultimately be resolved, there are clear benefits for crypto companies using arbitration as their chosen dispute resolution process, and certain …

Sequel: Negotiation Strategies Sag-Aftra And Amptp Should Employ To Prevent Future Strikes, Molly Baraban

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio (“SAG-AFTRA”) strike finally ended on November 9th, after months of contentious dealings between the two groups centering on concerns over the future of acting and the ability to compensate talent fairly. While we can now all finally celebrate the anticipated return of our favorite shows like Euphoria, House of the Dragon, and Stranger Things, we should also take a moment to critically analyze why SAG-AFTRA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (“AMPTP”) have historically continued to have conflict and how these groups can learn to negotiate better to …

A “Rule Making” Class: The Federal Trade Commission’S Expansive Per Se Ban On Noncompete Clauses: Authority, Enforceability, And The Need For Congressional Action, Nolan Johnson

Journal of Dispute Resolution

A non-compete clause is “an agreement or contract not to interfere or compete with a former employer (as by working with a competitor).” The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has proposed a per se ban on non-compete provisions in employment contracts. This would arguably be the FTC’s second substantive rule under the FTC Act. This substantive rule making departs from the traditional common law style rule-making process in which the courts create antitrust jurisprudence standards. In this way, the FTC has challenged the practice by exploring a new avenue of power under Section 5 of the FTC Act.

The Judicial Grassroots Of The "Arbitration Revolution", Tamar Meshel

William & Mary Business Law Review

The “arbitration revolution”—the meteoric rise in the use of arbitration in the United States—is commonly imputed to the Supreme Court’s unilateral and ideologically driven expansion of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The portrayal of the FAA’s evolution as a campaign launched by a Supreme Court that is out of touch with society and with the judicial system over which it presides usefully serves to delegitimize both this one-hundred year-old statute and arbitration more generally. This Article argues that the popular description of the Supreme Court as the sole instigator of the “arbitration revolution” is misleading because it conveniently ignores a …

Applicable Law And The Civil And Common Law Divide, George A. Bermann

Faculty Scholarship

In examining the relevance of civil law and common law synergies in international arbitration, we often dwell on aspects of arbitral practice and procedure. This should occasion no surprise. Our attention turns to arbitral practice and procedure, for that is what we do, as arbitrator and counsel, and on a daily basis. Leaving aside investor-State arbitration, in which substantive public international law looms large, international arbitration is very much a procedural endeavor.

But it should not be forgotten that the differences between the civil law and the common law manifest themselves not only, and not even primarily, in practice and …

Ending The Epidemic Of Accidental Personality Disorder Discrimination By Well-Meaning Mediators, Dan Berstein, Hannah Diamond, Philip T. Yanos

Journal of Dispute Resolution

People who have or appear to have mental disorders encounter rampant bias and stigma, including from mediators. This article focuses on some of the most heavily stigmatized mental health problems - personality disorders - and how some mediators discriminate against parties based on their guesses and assumptions that those parties may have these conditions.

Odd One Out: Inconsistency In The Federal Arbitration Act’S Jurisdictional Language, Joshua Long

Journal of Dispute Resolution

After almost a century, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) continues to guide and change the arbitration landscape. While greater focus has been placed on the FAA’s substantive merits and evolution, the act’s procedural role in outlining the relationship between arbitration and the federal court system plays an equally important role in alternate dispute resolution. Notably, recent concerns regarding inconsistencies in the act’s jurisdictional language may undermine the FAA’s ability to provide a clear, efficient, and fair process for arbitration.

Backdating #Metoo, Jessica K. Fink

Cardozo Law Review

The #MeToo movement radically altered the way that people think about workplace sexual harassment. For decades, women were expected to tolerate a broad range of sexualized conduct at work. However, the revelation of Harvey Weinstein’s misdeeds in late 2017, followed by the exposure of countless other bad actors, dramatically shifted the social narrative regarding appropriate workplace behavior. Conduct that employees once ignored or overlooked suddenly became the basis for vociferous objection; the perfunctory responses to harassment that many employers once adopted suddenly stood out as glaringly deficient.

While society has undergone great shifts in its understanding of and response to …

Modular Bankruptcy: Toward A Consumer Scheme Of Arrangement, John A.E. Pottow

Cardozo Law Review

In the world of cross-border corporate insolvency, those in the know are familiar with the increasingly popular scheme of arrangement, the British quasi-reorganization procedure that allows a company to restructure some, but not all, of its debt. The typical scheme effects a corporate balance sheet reshuffling by supermajoritarian approval (and judicial “sanction”) but often leaves other debt, such as the trade, untouched. A key conceptual component of the scheme mechanism is its intentional modularity, called by some its “selectivity.” It does not require a comprehensive reckoning of all claims against a given debtor, only some. The scheme has proved popular—so …

Caroline E. Foster, Global Regulatory Standards In Environmental And Health Disputes: Regulatory Coherence, Due Regard, And Due Diligence, Henry S. Gao

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

With ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State’ 1 at the beginning of the twentieth century, regulation replaced litigation as the main method of social control in the United States. Over the past few decades, more and more countries around the world started to follow the example of the United States, which led to the global expansion of the regulatory state. This in turn spurred more international disputes due to divergences in the respective regulatory standards. Theoretically speaking, global regulation might be the best solution. However, so far this not happened, partly due to the paralysis of the law-making functions of …

Faculty List

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Description

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Masthead

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Zf Automotive V. Luxshare: The Supreme Court’S New Gloss On 28 U.S. Code § 1782 And What It Means For International Commercial Arbitration, Madina Lokova

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The federal statute 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (“Section 1782”) allows litigants in foreign proceedings to obtain discovery in the United States, under the broad US discovery rules, for use in such proceedings. Although Section 1782’s use by parties to foreign proceedings has been expanding, there was a split in authority regarding whether the statute was broad enough to permit United States’ courts to authorize discovery for use in private arbitration proceedings overseas.