Constitutional Law Commons^™

State Of Israel, Courts Administration V. Themarker – Haaretz Newspaper, Ltd., Edna Arbel, Yoram Danziger, Neal Hendel, Elyakim Rubinstein, Salim Joubran, Esther Hayut, Uzi Vogelman

Translated Opinions

This is an appeal on an administrative judgment, in the framework of which appellant no. 1, the Courts Administration, was ordered to deliver information for the scrutiny of the respondents—a newspaper and a journalist employed by that newspaper—under the Freedom of Information Law, concerning the number of open cases that are being deliberated in the Supreme Court and in the district courts, indicating the amount of time that has elapsed since each case was opened, and the names of the judges hearing the cases. The State agreed to publish most of the information that was requested, segmented according to judge, …

Do All Roads Lead To Islamic Radicalism? A Comparison Of Islamic Laws In India And Nigeria, Amitabha Bose

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Seeking A Democratic Path: Constitutional Reform In Guyana, Honourable Hari N. Ramkarran

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

September 18, 2014" How To Think, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “How to Think“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Anonymous V. Orbach, Asher Grunis, Miriam Naor, Edna Arbel, Uzi Vogelman, Elyakim Rubinstein, Neal Hendel, Yoram Danziger, Isaac Amit, Salim Joubran

Translated Opinions

The translation of this case encompasses portions of President Grunis' majority opinion, Justice Hendel's concurrence, and Justice Rubinstein's dissent.

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

Facts: On Nov. 22, 2004, the television program “Uvda [“Fact”] with Ilana Dayan” (hereinafter: Uvda) aired an investigative report (hereinafter: the report) prepared and delivered by Dr. Ilana Dayan-Orbach, Respondent 1 (hereinafter: Dayan). The report was preceded by “promos” by Respondent 2, …

Moshe V. The Board For Approval Of Embryo Carrying Agreements Under The Embryo Carrying Agreements Law, Elyakim Rubinstein, Asher Grunis, Miriam Naor, Salim Joubran, Esther Hayut, Edna Arbel, Hanan Melcer

Translated Opinions

The Petitioners are a female couple who wish to bring into the world a child by fertilizing an egg extracted from the body of the First Petitioner and implanted in the uterus of the Second Petitioner, who would carry the pregnancy and give birth. The Ministry of Health rejected their requests for the approvals of performing this procedure in Israel. Hence this Petition, which challenges various provisions in the Embryo Carrying Agreements Law (Approval of the Agreement and the Status of the Child), 5756-1996 (hereinafter: the Surrogacy Law) and the Eggs Donation Law, 5770-2010 (hereinafter: the Eggs Donation Law). It …

Vladimir Putin And The Rule Of Law In Russia, Jeffrey Kahn

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Must Treaty Violations Be Remedied?: A Critique Of Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon, John Quigley

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

September 14, 2014: Chasing Moderates In Syria, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Chasing Moderates in Syria“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Redefining The Right To Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights And The Constitutionality Of Technical Surveillance Measures In Germany And The United States, Nicole Jacoby

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Thick Constitutional Readings: When Classic Distinctions Are Irrelevant, David Robertson

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Rethinking Constitutional Review In America And The Commonwealth: Judicial Protection Of Human Rights In The Common Law World, Po Jen Yap

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Official, National, Common Or Unifying: Do Words Giving Legal Status To Language Diminish Linguistic Human Rights?, Paul C. Hale

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Learning Lessons From Multani: Considering Canada's Response To Religious Garb Issues In Public Schools, Allison N. Crawford

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

A Comparative Analysis Of Unconscious And Institutional Discrimination In The United States And Britain, Leland Ware

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

The Jurisprudence Of Discrimination As Opposed To Simple Inequality In The International Civil Service, Brian D. Patterson

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

September 11, 2014: National Motto Fails In Allegheny County, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “National Motto Fails in Allegheny County“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Falling Into The Trap: The Ineffectiveness Of ‘Undue Burden’ Analysis In Protecting Women’S Right To Choose, Laura Young

Pace Law Review

This Comment will first examine existing Supreme Court abortion and reproductive autonomy jurisprudence before seguing into an exploration of the limits of the ‘undue burden’ analysis through the Jackson Women’s Health Organization v. Currier temporary and preliminary injunction decisions. The final section of this Comment explores potential solutions from other areas of constitutional law, and proposes that some techniques for limiting the reach of state regulatory power might be imported from environmental law, which frequently must deal with interactions amongst complex regulatory regimes.

The Right To Travel: Breaking Down The Thousand Petty Fortresses Of State Self-Deportation Laws, R. Linus Chan

Pace Law Review

Part I of this Article discusses the limitation of the pre-emption doctrine on state self-deportation laws. Part II discusses a short history of the Supreme Court’s application of the right to travel. Part III explains why the lack of federal authorization or immigrant status does not exclude people from the right to travel’s protection. Part IV discusses how the right to travel relates to citizenship and how the undocumented may exercise what has been described as a privilege or immunity of citizenship. Finally, Part V examines how the current state-based “self-deportation” immigration laws violate the right to travel.

The Exceptional Absence Of Human Rights As A Principle In American Law, Mugambi Jouet

Pace Law Review

Compared to other Western democracies, references to “human rights” are rare in domestic American law. A survey of landmark Supreme Court cases reveals that both conservative and liberal Justices made no mention of “human rights” when addressing fundamental questions: racial segregation, the death penalty, prisoners’ rights, women’s rights, children’s rights, gay rights, and indefinite detention at Guantanamo. This absence illustrates a broader societal trait. In the United States, “human rights” commonly evoke foreign problems like abuses in Third World dictatorships—not domestic problems. By contrast, human rights play a relatively important role as a domestic principle in Europe, Canada, Australia, and …