Brief Of Constitutional Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent,
2019
William & Mary Law School
Brief Of Constitutional Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, Vincent Levy, Timothy Zick, Gregory P. Magarian
Briefs
No abstract provided.
August 11, 2019: Here Is The Column On Mass Shootings And Our Spiritual Crisis,
2019
Duquesne University
August 11, 2019: Here Is The Column On Mass Shootings And Our Spiritual Crisis, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Here is the column on mass shootings and our spiritual crisis“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Brief Of Douglas Laycock, James E. Pfander, Alexander A. Reinert And Joanna C. Schwartz As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners,
2019
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Brief Of Douglas Laycock, James E. Pfander, Alexander A. Reinert And Joanna C. Schwartz As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Alexander A. Reinert
Amicus Briefs
Amici are legal scholars whose focus includes remedies, federal courts, the separation of powers, and constitutional law. They have a strong professional interest in the proper development of the law, which includes accounting for the best available empirical evidence and structural legal principles bearing on the questions here at issue.
Amici are Douglas Laycock, Robert E. Scott, Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law; James E. Pfander, Owen L. Coon Professor of Law at the Pritzker School of Law at Northwestern University; Alexander A. Reinert, Max Freund Professor of Litigation and Advocacy at the Benjamin …
Establishing An “Injury-In-Fact” Through Valuations Of Ecosystem Services: Putting It In Terms Federal Courts Understand,
2019
University of Minnesota Law School
Establishing An “Injury-In-Fact” Through Valuations Of Ecosystem Services: Putting It In Terms Federal Courts Understand, Allie Jo Mitchell
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
No abstract provided.
August 8, 2019: America Needs A Substitute For God,
2019
Duquesne University
August 8, 2019: America Needs A Substitute For God, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “America Needs a Substitute for God“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
A Rhetorical Revolution: The Antithesis Of The First Amendment,
2019
Brigham Young University Law School
A Rhetorical Revolution: The Antithesis Of The First Amendment, Eimi Priddis Yildirim
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Upside Of Deep Fakes,
2019
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Upside Of Deep Fakes, Jessica Silbey, Woodrow Hartzog
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Condemn(The)Nation: Holding The United States Accountable Through Inverse Condemnation Claims For Its Role In Bringing About- And Then Failing To Mitigate And Adapt To Certain Effects Of- Climate Change,
2019
University at Buffalo School of Law
Condemn(The)Nation: Holding The United States Accountable Through Inverse Condemnation Claims For Its Role In Bringing About- And Then Failing To Mitigate And Adapt To Certain Effects Of- Climate Change, Joseph Rosenberg
Buffalo Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fixing Congress,
2019
Brigham Young University Law School
Fixing Congress, Samuel A. Marcosson
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Mathena V. Malvo: Brief Amici Curiae Of Erwin Chemerinsky, Aziz Huq, Leah Litman, David Strauss, Carlos Vazquez, And Larry Yackle In Support Of Respondent,
2019
University of Michigan Law School
Mathena V. Malvo: Brief Amici Curiae Of Erwin Chemerinsky, Aziz Huq, Leah Litman, David Strauss, Carlos Vazquez, And Larry Yackle In Support Of Respondent, Leah Litman
Appellate Briefs
Amici Erwin Chemerinsky, Aziz Huq, Leah Litman, David Strauss, Carlos Vazquez, and Larry Yackle are federal courts scholars, studying the operation and purposes of federal jurisdiction and criminal law. Although they have divergent legal and political outlooks, amici share a keen interest in the federal courts, having published extensively on these topics and collected decades of experience examining issues implicated in this case.
This case concerns the scope of the constitutional rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and held applicable on collateral review in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016). Respondent Lee …
Drying Up The Slippery Slope: A New Approach To The Second Amendment,
2019
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security
Drying Up The Slippery Slope: A New Approach To The Second Amendment, Stephanie Cooper Blum
Buffalo Law Review
Few issues are as divisive as guns in American society. In 2017, gun deaths in the United States reached their highest level in nearly forty years. The status quo is untenable as many gun rights groups feel that gun regulations are just a first step in a slippery slope of undermining the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms for self-defense. Conversely, many gun violence prevention activists insist that reasonable regulations concerning public safety can co-exist with the right to bear arms. This quagmire will never abate because on many levels both sides are right. For over 200 years, the courts …
Sex, Lies, And Videotape: Deep Fakes And Free Speech Delusions,
2019
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Sex, Lies, And Videotape: Deep Fakes And Free Speech Delusions, Mary Anne Franks, Ari Ezra Waldman
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Emoluments Today: The Framers’ Intent And The “Present” Problem,
2019
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Interpreting Emoluments Today: The Framers’ Intent And The “Present” Problem, Bianca Spinosa
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Joaquin – The Congenital Warrior,
2019
Seattle University School of Law
Joaquin – The Congenital Warrior, Tayyab Mahmud
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Some Thoughts On Joaquin Ávila,
2019
Seattle University School of Law
Some Thoughts On Joaquin Ávila, Bill Tamayo
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
“We Are Still Citizens, Despite Our Regrettable Past” Why A Conviction Should Not Impact Your Right To Vote,
2019
American Civil Liberties Union - Washington
“We Are Still Citizens, Despite Our Regrettable Past” Why A Conviction Should Not Impact Your Right To Vote, Jaime Hawk, Breanne Schuster
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Remembrance, One Person, One Vote: The Enduring Legacy Of Joaquin Avila,
2019
Seattle University School of Law
Remembrance, One Person, One Vote: The Enduring Legacy Of Joaquin Avila, Robert Chang
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Understanding The Politics Of Resentment: Of The Principles, Institutions, Counter-Strategies, Normative Change, And The Habits Of Heart,
2019
Princeton University Program in Law and Public Affairs
Understanding The Politics Of Resentment: Of The Principles, Institutions, Counter-Strategies, Normative Change, And The Habits Of Heart, Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
The paper asks, when is a constitutional design of any (domestic, international, supranational) polity in error? On the most general level, such a critical juncture occurs when a polity's founding document (treaty, convention, constitution) protects against dangers that no longer exist or does not protect against the dangers that were not contemplated by the founders. Constitutions not only rule but should also protect against deconstitution. When analyzed together, the cases of Hungary, Poland, South America, and more recently, the United States, suggest a worrying new pattern of the erosion of constitutional democracies. One may even speak of a recipe for …
"Believe Me," We Do Not Have A Foreign Emoluments Clause Violation,
2019
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
"Believe Me," We Do Not Have A Foreign Emoluments Clause Violation, Scotty N. Teal
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
President Trump was sued in New York District Court for allegedly violating the Foreign Emoluments Clause. In its brief, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) alleged that the president's international businesses and real estate holdings positioned him to receive money from foreign governments. These business interests, or entanglements, could "sway" or create an opportunity for negative foreign influence in violation of the Emoluments Clause. CREW states that these "entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic." CREW argued that President Trump violated the Emoluments Clause because the clause "cover[s] …
Nondelegation And The Major Questions Doctrine: Displacing Interpretive Power,
2019
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nondelegation And The Major Questions Doctrine: Displacing Interpretive Power, Marla D. Tortorice
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
