Citizenship Privilege Or The Right To Religious Freedom: The Blackmailing Of France's Islamic Women,
2010
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Citizenship Privilege Or The Right To Religious Freedom: The Blackmailing Of France's Islamic Women, Yael Barbibay
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note examines the tension between France's commitment to laïcité and the rights of Islamic immigrants, particularly women, to religious freedom and cultural identity. It critiques the denial of citizenship to Faiza Mabchour, arguing that such decisions reflect a broader effort to suppress Islamic practices and undermine pluralism. The analysis contends that France's rigid application of laïcité violates international human rights norms, particularly the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The article advocates for a more inclusive approach to citizenship that balances secularism with religious freedom and cultural diversity.
Prosecutorial Discretion In The Shadow Of Advisory Guidelines And Mandatory Minimums,
2010
St. John's University School of Law
Prosecutorial Discretion In The Shadow Of Advisory Guidelines And Mandatory Minimums, Michael A. Simons
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
Imagine the following rather run-of-the-mill crime spree:
Three young men, ranging in age from eighteen to twenty and without significant criminal histories, get together to rob a convenience store in New York City. They take an unloaded an inoperable gun, go into the store, point the gun at the clerk behind the counter, and take a few hundred dollars from the cash register. Flush with success, they decide to do it again, this time at a jewelry store down the block. One of the young men points the unloaded gun at the store employees, another stands guard by the …
Stepping Out Of The Vehicle: The Potential Of Arizona V. Gant To End Automatic Searches Incident To Arrest Beyond The Vehicular Context
,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Stepping Out Of The Vehicle: The Potential Of Arizona V. Gant To End Automatic Searches Incident To Arrest Beyond The Vehicular Context , Angad Singh
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Leviathan Speaks: Reining In The Government-Speech Doctrine Through A New And Restrictive Approach,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
When Leviathan Speaks: Reining In The Government-Speech Doctrine Through A New And Restrictive Approach, Carl G. Denigris
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: Rights, Regulations, And Revolvers: Baltimore City's Complex Constitutional Challenge Following District Of Columbia V. Heller,
2010
University of Baltimore School of Law
Comments: Rights, Regulations, And Revolvers: Baltimore City's Complex Constitutional Challenge Following District Of Columbia V. Heller, Ian W. Henderson
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equitable Balancing In The Age Of Statutes,
2010
Roger Williams University School of Law
Equitable Balancing In The Age Of Statutes, Jared Goldstein
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Adequacy Of The Presidential Succession System In The 21st Century: Filling The Gaps And Clarifying The Ambiguities In Constitutional And Extraconstitutional Arrangements,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
Introduction: The Adequacy Of The Presidential Succession System In The 21st Century: Filling The Gaps And Clarifying The Ambiguities In Constitutional And Extraconstitutional Arrangements, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Inevitably, the events of the day dominate the political agenda. The issues of presidential succession have been attended to in our national history only sporadically because, at most times, the question of who succeeds the President in cases of death, resignation, or incapacity does not have immediate relevance: the President is in good health, the presumption is he will serve out the term of his office for which he was elected, and political leaders ignore succession issues as if they were of only theoretical interest. And yet, again and again, succession questions have become of the most immediate consequence in …
Taking From The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Lessons In Ensuring Presidential Continuity,
2010
Saint Louis University School of Law
Taking From The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Lessons In Ensuring Presidential Continuity, Joel K. Goldstein
All Faculty Scholarship
Although some have criticized the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution for leaving gaps in America’s provisions for addressing presidential succession and inability, such complaints are misguided. The Amendment represented a major step forward by providing sensible and workable procedures to remedy some of the most glaring problems the nation faced. Its architects recognized the remaining gaps but realized that advancing a more comprehensive measure would preclude any progress. Nonetheless, remaining gaps present an unacceptable risk that the United States will find itself without a functioning President whose exercise of presidential powers and duties is seen as legitimate. What …
Litigation, Integration, And Transformation: Using Medicaid To Address Racial Inequities In Health Care,
2010
Saint Louis University School of Law
Litigation, Integration, And Transformation: Using Medicaid To Address Racial Inequities In Health Care, Ruqaiijah Yearby
All Faculty Scholarship
Using a public health policy perspective, this article examines the persistence of racial inequities in nursing homes and prescribes a solution to address these inequities. I use empirical data to prove the persistence of racial inequities in health care, analyze the government policies that allow racial inequities to continue, and provide a solution of regulatory integration. Specifically, I propose that civil rights enforcement be integrated with the nursing home enforcement system, which has been aggressively enforced and monitored. There are many strategies that may lead to the adoption of this system. One such strategy is using the Medicaid Act to …
Back To Color Blindness: Recent Developments In Race Discrimination Law In The United States,
2010
Saint Louis University School of Law
Back To Color Blindness: Recent Developments In Race Discrimination Law In The United States, Marcia L. Mccormick
All Faculty Scholarship
The United States has a long and somewhat conflicted history of espousing egalitarian values and yet tolerating a certain level of subordination of particular groups to a greater or lesser extent at the same time. Like many countries, it struggles with reconciling the goals of equality, pluralism, and liberty, and the balance has been struck differently at different times. In the current wave of such efforts, the Supreme Court is marking an increasingly formalist approach to the question of discrimination, while Congress appears to be pushing a slightly more substantive approach to discrimination. This short paper analyzes the Court’s recent …
Regulatory Adjudication,
2010
Saint Louis University School of Law
Regulatory Adjudication, Marcia L. Mccormick
All Faculty Scholarship
Calls for increased regulation are flying fast and furious these days. We use regulation in the United States to prevent harm that various kinds of activities might cause and also to create positive external benefits that those activities could yield, but might not without incentives. Most regulatory programs in the United States provide a blend of measures designed to create these positive external benefits, promote good practices in the industry, prevent harms, and provide those harmed with remedies. At a time in which we contemplate new ways to regulate to deal with the crises of the day and prevent the …
Are National Class Actions Constitutional?: A Reply To Hogg And Mckee,
2010
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Are National Class Actions Constitutional?: A Reply To Hogg And Mckee, Janet Walker
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
This article argues that there is no constitutional impediment to the certification of multijurisdictional class actions by provincial superior courts, and no constitutional requirement to confine plaintiff classes to those in which each claim has a real and substantial connection to the forum. Neither the text of the Constitution nor the constitutionally mandated rules of the conflict of laws restrict court jurisdiction in this way. Rather, the principles of order and fairness require Canadian courts to exercise jurisdiction over multi-jurisdictional class actions in a way that maximizes the objectives of class actions, and minimizes the incidence of overlapping classes and …
Richmond Medical Center For Women V. Herring: Prohibiting Partial Birth Abortion But Keeping Constitutional Rights Intact,
2010
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Richmond Medical Center For Women V. Herring: Prohibiting Partial Birth Abortion But Keeping Constitutional Rights Intact, Kathleen Morris
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Correcting Mismatched Authorities: Erecting A New "Water Federalism",
2010
Florida A & M University College of Law
Correcting Mismatched Authorities: Erecting A New "Water Federalism", Robert H. "Bo" Abrams
Journal Publications
In the United States water law is a subset of property law that controls the use and allocation of the water resource. Water law was, and remains, state law; nothing in the Constitution purports to change that. The scope of federal sovereignty at the time of nationhood did not include even the possibility of playing a major role in regulating resources because the national government was not a significant landholder. The twentieth century changed water federalism dramatically. In the twentieth century, even while laws and rhetoric respected the division of authority favoring the states, the real power over water in …
Civil Society And Democracy In Japan, Iran, Iraq And Beyond,
2010
Vanderbilt University Law School
Civil Society And Democracy In Japan, Iran, Iraq And Beyond, Shiva Falsafi
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article addresses the mystery of why some countries appear to become democracies seamlessly while others face insurmountable obstacles. While acknowledging the importance of civil society to democratization at the time of transition, this Article argues that broad historical civil society movements, even if devoid of immediate political impact, also facilitate the passage to democracy at a later date.
This Article takes a comparative look at the constitutional, labor, and women's movements in Japan, Iraq, and Iran, from the nineteenth century to the present. It demonstrates that the resilience of Japanese civil society from 1868 onward secured the country's successful …
Placing Your Faith In The Constitution,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Placing Your Faith In The Constitution, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
Proportionality: An Assault On Human Rights: A Reply,
2010
Columbia Law School
Proportionality: An Assault On Human Rights: A Reply, Madhav Khosla
Faculty Scholarship
In a recent article in I•CON, Stavros Tsakyrakis presents a passionate critique of the proportionality test. Tsakyrakis regards proportionality as an illusory attempt to infuse objectivity into rights adjudication. Moreover, he posits that it necessitates weighing public interests against individual rights. Proportionality has emerged, globally, as the leading framework for evaluating rights violations. It serves as the uniform standard of rights review in jurisdictions as diverse as Israel, Germany, Canada, and South Africa. Remarkably, recent opinions by Justice Stephen Breyer of the United States Supreme Court indicate that the approach is gaining currency within America's constitutional jurisprudence. Considering proportionality's …
Public Nuisance Suits For The Climate Justice Movement: The Right Thing And The Right Time,
2010
Florida A & M University College of Law
Public Nuisance Suits For The Climate Justice Movement: The Right Thing And The Right Time, Randall S. Abate
Journal Publications
The climate justice movement seeks to provide relief to vulnerable communities that have been disproportionately affected by climate change impacts. Public nuisance litigation for climate change impacts is a new and growing field that could provide the legal and policy underpinnings to help secure a viable foundation for climate justice in the United States and internationally. By securing victories in the court system, these suits may succeed where the domestic environmental justice movement failed in seeking to merge environmental protection and human rights concerns into an actionable legal theory. This Article first examines the nature and scope of the climate …
A Critical Consideration Of Executive Orders: Glimmerings Of Autopoiesis In The Executive Role,
2010
Florida A & M University College of Law
A Critical Consideration Of Executive Orders: Glimmerings Of Autopoiesis In The Executive Role, John C. Duncan Jr
Journal Publications
The United States Constitution is a parsimonious document, meant to retain the dynamic processes of the three branches of government within their respective spheres and overarching principles, beyond which it offers the latitude necessary for the developing nation to adapt to future contingencies. The Congress and the President are the governing institutions of two of those branches, to which agility is essential as a matter of survival. The most agile tool that the President has is the executive order. There is no statutory authority for the federal executive order or any other source that describes its legal effect, as such, …
Church V. State: Resolving One Problem But Raising Another - Addressing The Use Of The Surveillance Location Privilege And The Limited Remand,
2010
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Church V. State: Resolving One Problem But Raising Another - Addressing The Use Of The Surveillance Location Privilege And The Limited Remand, David J. Martin
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
