Constitutional Law—The Erosion Of Political Anonymity And Its Chilling Effect On Freedom Of Association: Reconsidering The Constitutionality Of The Mandated Public Disclosure Of Individuals’ Political Donations,
2020
University of Arkansas Little Rock
Constitutional Law—The Erosion Of Political Anonymity And Its Chilling Effect On Freedom Of Association: Reconsidering The Constitutionality Of The Mandated Public Disclosure Of Individuals’ Political Donations, Scout Snowden
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Preserving Dignity: The Due Process Restriction On Shackling Criminal Defendants Should Also Apply To Non-Jury Proceedings,
2020
University of Arkansas Little Rock
Constitutional Law—Preserving Dignity: The Due Process Restriction On Shackling Criminal Defendants Should Also Apply To Non-Jury Proceedings, Shelby Shelton
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Race Of A Neighborhood Criminalizes The Citizens Living Within: A Focus On The Supreme Court And The "High Crime Neighborhood",
2020
St. Thomas University College of Law
How The Race Of A Neighborhood Criminalizes The Citizens Living Within: A Focus On The Supreme Court And The "High Crime Neighborhood", Deandre' Augustus
St. Thomas Law Review
My whole life I was taught that all men are not created equal. This was beaten into my brain by my loving mother who just wanted me to be safe. You see, this message was part of what most young Black men hear when given “the talk.” I remember multiple variations of the talk given to me throughout my early childhood. However, a variation of the talk was most vividly remembered while taking our dog for a walk around my neighborhood with my mother. At the time, we lived in a suburban area, in a predominantly White neighborhood of Baton …
Selecting Scrutiny In Compelled-Speech Cases Involving Non-Commercial Expression: The Formulaic Landscape Of A Strict Scrutiny World After Becerra And Janus, And A First Amendment Interests-And-Values Alternative,
2020
University of Florida
Selecting Scrutiny In Compelled-Speech Cases Involving Non-Commercial Expression: The Formulaic Landscape Of A Strict Scrutiny World After Becerra And Janus, And A First Amendment Interests-And-Values Alternative, Clay Calvert
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
This Article examines how courts select the standard of scrutiny—strict, intermediate, or something akin to rational basis—in compelled-speech disputes following the United States Supreme Court’s 2018 rulings in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra and Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The compelled-speech doctrine provides individuals and entities with a qualified First Amendment right not to be forced by the government to convey messages under certain circumstances. This principle sometimes is referred to as an unenumerated First Amendment right not to speak. The Article concentrates on compelled-speech mandates involving non-commercial expression in …
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process,
2020
New York University - Washington, D.C.
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process, Marvin L. Astrada Jd, Phd
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
No abstract provided.
The Broken Branch: Capitalism, The Constitution, And The Press,
2020
Campbell University School of Law
The Broken Branch: Capitalism, The Constitution, And The Press, Luke Smith Morgan
Scholarly Works
The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees "freedom ...of the press," an explicit textual recognition of what the founding generation, informed by their immediate historical experience, frequently hailed as the most important political liberty-the "bulwark" upon which all other freedoms relied. From this fertile intellectual and legal soil, cultivated by generous subsidies, a thriving and vibrant institutional press emerged as an undeniable asset to American civil society.
Today, that press is dying. Industry revenues have declined by more than 70% in the last two decades, leaving tens of thousands of journalists without jobs and millions of Americans without meaningful access …
Families Belong Together: The Path To Family Sanctity In Public Housing,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Families Belong Together: The Path To Family Sanctity In Public Housing, Mckayla Stokes
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
In its 2015 landmark civil rights decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court finally held that the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution guarantee same-sex couples’ marital equality. The Court’s unprecedented declaration that the right to marry is a fundamental right under the Due Process Clause strengthened married couples’ right to privacy because it subjects government actions infringing on marital unions to heightened scrutiny. The Supreme Court has the option to minimize the impact of Obergefell by interpreting the right to marriage very narrowly—as only encompassing the right to enter into a state-recognized union …
The Pursuit Of Comprehensive Education Funding Reform Via Litigation,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Pursuit Of Comprehensive Education Funding Reform Via Litigation, Lisa Scruggs
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Panel Discussion: The Right To Education: With Liberty, Justice, And Education For All?,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Panel Discussion: The Right To Education: With Liberty, Justice, And Education For All?
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Ratification Of The Equal Rights Amendment: Lessons From Special Elections To The House Of Representatives In 1837,
2020
Maurer School of Law: Indiana University
Ratification Of The Equal Rights Amendment: Lessons From Special Elections To The House Of Representatives In 1837, John Vlahoplus
Indiana Law Journal
In 1837 the House of Representatives considered a governor’s attempt to include a limitation in a writ issued to fill a vacancy in representation pursuant to Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution. The Representatives agreed almost unanimously that the limitation was unconstitutional and should be disregarded as mere surplusage rather than invalidating the writ and the election. This Article suggests that the similar Article V gives Congress only the power to propose amendments, without any limitation, and States the power to ratify amendments or not, without any power to rescind. Consequently, the time limit that Congress purported to impose …
Constitutionally Unaccountable: Privatized Immigration Detention,
2020
University of Denver College of Law
Constitutionally Unaccountable: Privatized Immigration Detention, Danielle C. Jefferis
Indiana Law Journal
For-profit, civil immigration detention is one of this nation’s fastest growing industries. About two-thirds of the more than 50,000 people in the civil custody of federal immigration authorities find themselves at one point or another in a private, corporate-run prison that contracts with the federal government. Conditions of confinement in many of these facilities are dismal. Detainees have suffered from untreated medical conditions and endured months, in some cases years, of detention in environments that are unsafe and, at times, violent. Some have died. Yet, the spaces are largely unregulated. This Article exposes and examines the absence of a constitutional …
Developing Youth Voices,
2020
University of New Mexico - School of Law
Developing Youth Voices, Maryam Ahranjani
Faculty Scholarship
Discusses the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project, and its role in inspiring students to speak up about the things that are important to them. Students learn how the Constitution works by reading cases, and developing critical thinking and oral advocacy skills with relatable mentors.
For more information visit:
https://www.wcl.american.edu/impact/initiatives-programs/marshallbrennan/20th-anniversary/
Police Brutality And State-Sanctioned Violence In 21st Century America,
2020
Touro Law Center
Police Brutality And State-Sanctioned Violence In 21st Century America, Itohen Ihaza
Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality
No abstract provided.
The Methodology Of Social Adaptation Following The Liberation Of A Wrongful Conviction,
2020
Touro Law Center
The Methodology Of Social Adaptation Following The Liberation Of A Wrongful Conviction, Ashantwa Jackman
Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality
No abstract provided.
Ethical Considerations For Attorneys Researching Jurors On The Internet,
2020
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Ethical Considerations For Attorneys Researching Jurors On The Internet, Anthony M. Lapinta
Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality
No abstract provided.
Foreword,
2020
Touro Law Center
Foreword, Syndie G. E. Molina
Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality
No abstract provided.
On Trust, Law, And Expecting The Worst,
2020
Columbia Law School
On Trust, Law, And Expecting The Worst, Elizabeth F. Emens
Faculty Scholarship
This Review has three parts. Part I aims to convey something of the breadth and interest of Hasday’s fascinating new book, foregrounding the role of gender and beginning to touch the subject of trust. Part II delves briefly but widely into the theme of trust, which pervades the book and invites further examination. Part III presents a framework that combines affective trust and epistemic curiosity and applies this framework to illuminate and sort Hasday’s proposals for reform; to critique a recent, dramatic change in the evidentiary treatment of marital confidences; and to devise a novel approach to prenuptial agreements. Throughout, …
Addiction And Expression,
2020
UC Law SF
Addiction And Expression, Luke Morgan
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
Addictive products—such as tobacco, alcohol, and gambling—have been considered legitimate regulatory targets throughout American history and for thousands of years prior. Expressive products—such as newspapers, books, movies, and video games—have in the United States been considered essentially immune from content-based regulation, thanks to the First Amendment. But what if the content of an expressive product makes it addictive? Which tradition must give in: the ancient power of legislatures to protect society at large from the wideranging impacts of addiction, or the legal shield that has generated a thriving culture of artistic independence? This Article is the first to explore the …
Constitutional Discourse And The Rhetoric Of Treason,
2020
UC Law SF
Constitutional Discourse And The Rhetoric Of Treason, J. Richard Broughton
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
This Article asserts that treason talk is a form of constitutional discourse. Further, the Article explains that although treason remains a crime worth taking seriously in American criminal and constitutional law, colloquial invocations of treason have the potential to undermine treason’s seriousness and erode its constitutional and historical foundations, as well as diminish an appreciation of its limits. That is particularly true when treason is invoked by a sitting president, whose unique role in constitutional government—and potential to influence criminal prosecutions— requires special caution with respect to public rhetoric about treason. This Article then cites two specific and complicated areas …
The First Amendment And Modern Technology: The Free Speech Clause And Chatbot Speech,
2020
UC Law SF
The First Amendment And Modern Technology: The Free Speech Clause And Chatbot Speech, Hilda Kajbaf
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
Our contemporary conversations with chatbots raise a constitutional question not previously considered: is the speech produced by chatbots constitutionally protected? If so, whose speech is the Constitution protecting—that of the chatbot or the human who programmed it with algorithms? If the Supreme Court recognizes the human programmer as the speaker of chatbot speech, as this Note contends it should, what are the potential liabilities the programmer could face as a result of such recognition, and how would this change the doctrinal landscape of the First Amendment for government regulation of speech? This Note proceeds in five parts. Section I defines …
