Scientific Productivity And Gender Performance Under Open And Proprietary Science Systems: The Case Of Chile In Recent Years,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
Scientific Productivity And Gender Performance Under Open And Proprietary Science Systems: The Case Of Chile In Recent Years, Bernadita Escobar Andrae
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Gender Violence And Work In The United States And South America: The Parallel Processes Of Legal And Cultural Change,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
Gender Violence And Work In The United States And South America: The Parallel Processes Of Legal And Cultural Change, Julie Goldscheid
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Transnational Class Actions And The Illusory Search For Res Judicata,
2011
University at Buffalo School of Law
Transnational Class Actions And The Illusory Search For Res Judicata, Tanya J. Monestier
Journal Articles
The transnational class action—a class action in which a portion of the class consists of non-U.S. claimants—is here to stay. Defendants typically resist the certification of transnational class actions on the basis that such actions provide no assurance of finality for a defendant, as it will always be possible for a non-U.S. class member to initiate subsequent proceedings in a foreign court. In response to this concern, many U.S. courts will analyze whether the “home” courts of the foreign class members would accord res judicata effect to an eventual U.S. judgment prior to certifying a U.S. class action containing foreign …
Epilog: Foreign Sovereign Immunity At Home And Abroad,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
Epilog: Foreign Sovereign Immunity At Home And Abroad, Ingrid Wuerth
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Every author writing on U.S. law for this symposium notes that the extent to which the Executive Branch can make binding immunity determinations is an important issue going forward. In addition to Legal Adviser Koh, two other authors address this issue directly. Professor Peter Rutledge provides a typology of the various roles that the Executive Branch might play in immunity (and other) cases, distinguishing in particular between views articulated by the Executive Branch independently of ongoing litigation, and those expressed with respect to particular pending cases. And Lewis Yelin of the Department of Justice has contributed a major, comprehensive article …
A Club Of Incumbents? The African Union And Coups D'Etat,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
A Club Of Incumbents? The African Union And Coups D'Etat, Eki Y. Omorogbe
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article considers the response of the Organization for African Unity (the OAU, founded in 1963) and its successor, the African Union (the AU, which began operating in 2003) to coups d'etat, since 1997. The Article addresses these organizations' policies concerning unconstitutional changes of government, as well as the application of these policies. In considering these issues, the Article examines the response of the AU to the coups in Togo (2005), Mauritania (2005 and 2008), Guinea (2008), Madagascar (2009), and Niger (2010). In each case, the AU was unwilling to recognize the government that came to power through coup, even …
East Meets West: Introducing Sharia Into The Rules Governing International Arbitrations At The Bcdr-Aaa,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
East Meets West: Introducing Sharia Into The Rules Governing International Arbitrations At The Bcdr-Aaa, Elana Levi-Tawil
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
As the size and complexity of international commercial transactions grow, parties to international commercial transactions are increasingly utilizing Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") methods, specifically international commercial arbitration, to resolve the disputes that arise. However, since international commercial players first began to use international commercial arbitration to resolve these disputes, transnational recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has been a major issue. Since 1958, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention"), an agreement executed by the United Nation's General Assembly, has vastly expanded the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral …
Japan's Business Revitalization Adr: An Economic Savior Or A Convenient Excuse To Avoid Bankruptcy?,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Japan's Business Revitalization Adr: An Economic Savior Or A Convenient Excuse To Avoid Bankruptcy?, Naoko Okamoto
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note analyzes Japan's newly enacted "Business Revitalization Alternative Dispute Resolution" (ADR) and its effectiveness in revitalizing the Japanese economy. Due to ADR's economic and procedural ease, Business Revitalization ADR has been employed by companies undergoing revitalization processes and negotiating with creditors in extending debt payments. Nonetheless, ADR proceedings, specifically mediation between creditors and debtors, create only short-term economic value. Because of cultural characteristics of mediation and the nature of mediation in the business context in Japan, Business Revitalization ADR may be subject to abuse by companies that should have gone bankrupt. In fact, many companies may save themselves from …
After The Ecj's West Tankers: The Clash Of Civilizations On The Issue Of An Anti-Suit Injunction,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
After The Ecj's West Tankers: The Clash Of Civilizations On The Issue Of An Anti-Suit Injunction, Grace Gunah Kim
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note argues that the ECJ's West Tankers decision to ban an anti-suit injunction in Europe, coupled with the recent European Commission's reform proposals to govern arbitration within the jurisdictional framework of the Brussels Regulation No. 44/ 2001 ("Brussels Regulation"), directly clash with the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("New York Convention") and practically amount to a blanket rule that bars English courts from upholding arbitration agreements.
Should Juries Give Reasons For Their Verdicts?: The Spanish Experience And The Implications Of The European Court Of Human Rights Decision In Taxquet V. Belgium,
2011
Saint Louis University School of Law
Should Juries Give Reasons For Their Verdicts?: The Spanish Experience And The Implications Of The European Court Of Human Rights Decision In Taxquet V. Belgium, Stephen C. Thaman
All Faculty Scholarship
This article discusses the Belgian jury system and the decision in Taxquet v. Belgium and then explores to what extent a requirement of reasoned judgments will affect the survival of European juries. It focuses on Spain, where the jury is required to give reasons for its verdicts, and where a lively high-court jurisprudence has developed addressing the quality and sufficiency of jury reasons. This article suggests that it might be appropriate for jury courts in the United States to in some way justify their decision of guilt, in order to minimize the amount of completely innocent persons who have been …
Restatements,
2011
Duke Law School
Restatements, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
Written for an encyclopedia on European private law, this brief article first addresses the term restatements and then compares the U.S. Restatement of the law as prototype with different European restatements of the law in the area of private law.
Universal Exceptionalism In International Law,
2011
Columbia Law School
Universal Exceptionalism In International Law, Anu Bradford, Eric A. Posner
Faculty Scholarship
A trope of international law scholarship is that the United States is an "exceptionalist" nation, one that takes a distinctive (frequently hostile, unilateralist, or hypocritical) stance toward international law. However, all major powers are similarly "exceptionalist," in the sense that they take distinctive approaches to international law that reflect their values and interests. We illustrate these arguments with discussions of China, the European Union, and the United States. Charges of international-law exceptionalism betray an undefended assumption that one particular view of international law (for scholars, usually the European view) is universally valid.
Defining Civil Disputes: Lessons From Two Jurisdictions,
2011
Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
Defining Civil Disputes: Lessons From Two Jurisdictions, Elizabeth Thornburg, Camille Cameron
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Court systems have adopted a variety of mechanisms to narrow the issues in dispute and expedite litigation. This article analyses the largely unsuccessful attempts in two jurisdictions - the United States and Australia - to achieve early and efficient issue identification in civil disputes. Procedures that rely on pleadings to provide focus have failed for centuries, from the common (English) origins of these two systems to their divergent modern paths. Case management practices that are developing in the United States and Australia offer greater promise in the continuing quest for early, efficient dispute definition. Based on a historical and contemporary …
The Price Of Access To The Civil Courts In Australia: Old Problems And New Solutions - A Commercial Litigation Funding Case Study,
2011
Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
The Price Of Access To The Civil Courts In Australia: Old Problems And New Solutions - A Commercial Litigation Funding Case Study, Camille Cameron
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In the past decade litigation funding companies have assumed an increasingly prominent role in commercial litigation and class actions in Australia. The growth of commercial litigation funding is a predictable response to various features of Australia’s costs and fee allocation rules and practices, including the “loser pays” rule, the prohibition on lawyer’s charging contingency fees, the hourly billing practices of lawyers, and the open-ended and unpredictable nature of much civil litigation. This chapter explores the growth of commercial litigation funding in Australia and uses it as a window through which to view how Australia’s costs and fee allocation rules operate …
Harvesting Intellectual Property: Inspired Beginnings And 'Work-Makes-Work,' Two Stages In The Creative Processes Of Artists And Innovators,
2011
Boston University School of Law
Harvesting Intellectual Property: Inspired Beginnings And 'Work-Makes-Work,' Two Stages In The Creative Processes Of Artists And Innovators, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
This Article is part of a larger empirical study based on face-to-face interviews with artists, scientists, engineers, their lawyers, agents, and business partners. The book-length project involves the collecting and analysis of stories from artists, scientists, and engineers about how and why they create and innovate. It also collects stories from their employers, business partners, managers, and lawyers about their role in facilitating the process of creating and innovating. The book’s aim is to make sense of the intersection between intellectual property law and creative and innovative activity, specifically to discern how intellectual property intervenes in the careers of the …
Advice And Consent Vs. Silence And Dissent? The Contrasting Roles Of The Legislature In U.S. And U.K. Judicial Appointments,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
Advice And Consent Vs. Silence And Dissent? The Contrasting Roles Of The Legislature In U.S. And U.K. Judicial Appointments, Mary Clark
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
The Senate‘s role in judicial appointments has come under increasingly withering criticism for its uninformative and spectacle-like nature. At the same time, Britain has established two new judicial appointment processes - to accompany its new Supreme Court and existing lower courts - in which Parliament plays no role. This Article seeks to understand the reasons for the inclusion and exclusion of the legislature in the U.S. and U.K. judicial appointment processes adopted at the creation of their respective Supreme Courts.
The Article proceeds by highlighting the ideas and concerns motivating inclusion of the legislature in judicial appointments in the early …
End-Of-Life Decision-Making In Canada: The Report By The Royal Society Of Canada Expert Panel On End-Of-Life Decision-Making,
2011
Utrecht University - University Medical Center
End-Of-Life Decision-Making In Canada: The Report By The Royal Society Of Canada Expert Panel On End-Of-Life Decision-Making, Udo Schuklenk, Johannes J. M. Van Delden, Jocelyn Downie, Sheila Mclean, Ross Upshur, Daniel Marc Weinstock
Reports & Public Policy Documents
This report on end-of-life decision-making in Canada was produced by an international expert panel and commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada. It consists of five chapters: Chapter 1 reviews what is known about end-of-life care and opinions about assisted dying in Canada, Chapter 2 reviews the legal status quo in Canada with regard to various forms of assisted death, Chapter 3 reviews ethical issues pertaining to assisted death. The analysis is grounded in core values central to Canada’s constitutional order, Chapter 4 reviews the experiences had in a number of jurisdictions that have decriminalized or recently reviewed assisted dying …
The French Jury At A Crossroads,
2011
Cornell Law School
The French Jury At A Crossroads, Valerie P. Hans, Claire M. Germain
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Vicki C. Jackson, Constitutional Engagement In A Transnational Era,
2011
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Vicki C. Jackson, Constitutional Engagement In A Transnational Era, Melissa A. Waters
Scholarship@WashULaw
This essay reviews and critiques Vicki C. Jackson's book on constitutional engagement and comparative constitutional law.
Over the past decade, the debate over the use of foreign authority in interpreting the U.S. Constitution has fallen prey to an unfortunate “Crossfire” phenomenon, reminiscent of the old (and much maligned) CNN news commentary program. Serious discourse on this important issue has been obscured by an increasingly rancorous public debate in the news media, the blogosphere, and even before Congress. In this Crossfire debate, it seems, everyone must “choose up sides.” So-called “nationalists” deplore even most modest citations to foreign authority in constitutional …
Ruti Teitel Responds To Shana Tabak,
2011
New York Law School
Ruti Teitel Responds To Shana Tabak, Ruti G. Teitel
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
The Functionalism Of Legal Origins,
2011
Duke Law School
The Functionalism Of Legal Origins, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
This article, written on request for the centennial issue of Ius Commune Europaeum, connects the economic literature on legal origins (La Porta et al) and the World Bank's Doing Business reports with discussions in comparative law about the functional method. It finds that a number of parallels and similarities exist, and that much of the criticism that has been voiced against functionalism should apply, mutates mutants, also to these more recent projects. The attraction that these projects have derive not, it is argued, from their methodological sophistication, but instead from "the strange lure of economics" and from the ostentatious objectivity …
