The Prisoners' Property Dilemma: The Proper Approach To Determine Prisoners' Protected Property Interests After Sandin And Castle Rock, 2012 Univeristy of Georgia School of Law
The Prisoners' Property Dilemma: The Proper Approach To Determine Prisoners' Protected Property Interests After Sandin And Castle Rock, Corbin R. Kennelly
Georgia Law Review
The Proper approach to determine when prisoners have
property interests protected by the Due Process Clause is
currently uncertain. The Supreme Court addressed
prisoners' liberty interests in Sandin v. Conner, but lower
courts have split over whether to apply the Sandin test to
prisoners' property interests. Further complicating
matters, the Supreme Court recently addressed property
interests generally in Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales.
There, the Court seemed to add additional hurdles to the
finding of protected property interests: A statute must
clearly indicate that it gives rise to an entitlement; the
entitlement must have an ascertainable monetary value;
and, …
Slavery In The United States: Persons Or Property?, 2012 Duke Law School
Slavery In The United States: Persons Or Property?, Paul Finkelman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Not As Bad As You Think: Why Garcetti V. Ceballos Makes Sense, 2012 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Not As Bad As You Think: Why Garcetti V. Ceballos Makes Sense, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Once Is Enough: The Need To Apply The Full Ellerth/Faragher Affirmative Defense In Single Incident And Incipient Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims, 2012 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Once Is Enough: The Need To Apply The Full Ellerth/Faragher Affirmative Defense In Single Incident And Incipient Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims, Charles W. Garrison
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Uncounseled Tribal Court Convictions In Federal Court Under The Habitual Offender Provision Of The Violence Against Women Act: A Violation Of The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel Or An Extension Of Comity?, 2012 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
The Use Of Uncounseled Tribal Court Convictions In Federal Court Under The Habitual Offender Provision Of The Violence Against Women Act: A Violation Of The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel Or An Extension Of Comity?, Rebecca Zimmerman
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
If It’S Broken, Let Them Fix It: Why The Gebser Pre-Litigation Notice Requirement Should Apply To Title Ix Athletics Lawsuits, 2012 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
If It’S Broken, Let Them Fix It: Why The Gebser Pre-Litigation Notice Requirement Should Apply To Title Ix Athletics Lawsuits, Zachary Swartz
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Irony Of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church And School V Eeoc, 2012 University of Miami School of Law
The Irony Of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church And School V Eeoc, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, a schoolteacher sued her employer for retaliating against her in violation of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). The success of her ADA claim turned on whether the Supreme Court thought that she was a minister. If she was not a minister, she would have probably won. After all, the school stated in writing that a main reason for her termination was her threatened lawsuit. But because the Supreme Court decided that she was a minister, and that ministers may not sue their religious employers for discrimination under the ministerial …
A Horrible Fascination: Segregation, Obscenity, & The Cultural Contingency Of Rights, 2012 Saint Louis University School of Law
A Horrible Fascination: Segregation, Obscenity, & The Cultural Contingency Of Rights, Anders Walker
All Faculty Scholarship
Building on current interest in the regulation of child pornography, this article goes back to the 1950s, recovering a lost history of how southern segregationists used the battle against obscenity to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. Itself focused on the psychological development of children, Brown sparked a discursive backlash in the South focused on claims that the races possessed different cultures and that white children would be harmed joined a larger, regional campaign, a constitutional guerilla war mounted by moderates and extremists alike that swept onto cultural, First Amendment terrain even as the frontal …
Changing The Marriage Equation, 2012 Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Changing The Marriage Equation, Deborah A. Widiss
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Article brings together legal, historical, and social science research to analyze how couples allocate income-producing and domestic responsibilities. It develops a framework—what I call the “marriage equation”—that shows how sex-based classifications, (non-sex-specific) substantive marriage law, and gender norms interrelate to shape these choices. The marriage equation has changed over time, both reflecting and engendering societal preferences regarding the optimal allocation of breadwinning and caretaking responsibilities.
Until fifty years ago, sex-based classifications in family and employment law aligned with gender norms to enforce an ideology of separate spheres for men and women. The groundbreaking sex discrimination cases of the 1970s …
Community Economic Development And The Paradox Of Power, 2012 Georgetown University Law Center
Community Economic Development And The Paradox Of Power, Michael R. Diamond
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article starts from the premise that poverty is a growing problem in the United States. Intergenerational poverty, the entrenchment of a class of very poor people, is a major sub set of that problem and is tied very closely to the issue of race. The author claims that missing in the fight by the poor and their allies against stratified poverty is the creation and utilization of power. This paper examines the disparate ways in which commentators have defined power. It suggests that those seeking to obtain power must understand the concept’s varying meanings and direct their activities to …
The Moral Complexity Of Cause Lawyers Within The State, 2012 Georgetown University Law Center
The Moral Complexity Of Cause Lawyers Within The State, David Luban
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Douglas NeJaime's Cause Lawyers Inside the State is a significant contribution to our understanding of cause lawyers. Most basically, NeJaime calls attention to a remarkably neglected topic: cause lawyers who work in the state rather than in public interest firms, law school clinics, or other non-governmental organizations (NGOs). His analysis undermines a narrative that students of cause lawyering too often presuppose: that to be a cause lawyer means standing outside the state, and usually in opposition to it. Almost by definition, a "cause" exists because the dominant institutions of society have failed to represent the interests and ideas of some …
Why The Law Needs Music: Revisiting Naacp V. Button Through The Songs Of Bob Dylan, 2012 Michigan State University College of Law
Why The Law Needs Music: Revisiting Naacp V. Button Through The Songs Of Bob Dylan, Renee Newman Knake
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The law needs music, a truth revealed by revisiting the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in NAACP v. Button through the songs of Bob Dylan and the play Music History. This Essay proceeds in three parts. Part I opens with a summary of the Court’s decision in NAACP v. Button, focusing particularly on the expanded understanding of First Amendment rights related to access to the law that flow from this legal opinion. Part II explains the inspiration for this Essay, Seaton’s play Music History, which reveals the influence of music on law and culture during the civil rights movement. Part …
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan, 2012 New York law School
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan, Michael L. Perlin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In this Article, I will try to create a topography of Bob-as-jurisprudential scholar by looking at selected Dylan songs in these discrete areas of law (and law-and-society): civil rights; inequality of the criminal justice system; institutions; governmental/judicial corruption; equality and emancipation (political and economic); poverty, the environment, and inequality of the civil justice system; and the role of lawyers and the legal process.
Intentional Discrimination In Farrakhan V. Gregoire: The Ninth Circuit's Voting Rights Act Standard "Results In" The New Jim Crow, 2012 Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Intentional Discrimination In Farrakhan V. Gregoire: The Ninth Circuit's Voting Rights Act Standard "Results In" The New Jim Crow, Jonathan Sgro
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Redefining The Black Face Of Affirmative Action: The Impact On Ascendant Black Women, 2012 Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Redefining The Black Face Of Affirmative Action: The Impact On Ascendant Black Women, Kevin D. Brown, Renee E. Turner
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The racial and ethnic ancestries of blacks benefiting from affirmative action is changing, as foreign-born blacks and blacks with a non-black parent constitute disproportionately large percentages of blacks attending many selective higher education institutions. Coupled with the challenges arising from the educational achievement levels of black males during the past two decades, Brown and Turner examine the implication of these developments and the likelihood that they are creating further disadvantages for black women lawyers.
An Updated Quantitative Study Of Iqbal's Impact On 12(B)(6) Motions, 2012 St. Mary’s University School of Law
An Updated Quantitative Study Of Iqbal's Impact On 12(B)(6) Motions, Patricia W. Moore
Faculty Articles
The effect of Ashcroft v. Iqbal on pleading standards and behavior is a source of significant legal debate. This article serves as a follow-up to Professor Moore's 2010 empirical study on Iqbal's effect on courts' rulings on motions to dismiss complaints for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Professor Moore's previous study found a statistically significant increase in the likelihood that a court grants a 12(b)(6) motion with leave to amend following Iqbal. In this article, Professor Moore updates and increases the pool of cases in her database. The updated data …
Response: The Death Of The Bisexual Saboteur, 2012 Georgetown University Law Center
Response: The Death Of The Bisexual Saboteur, Naomi Mezey
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Glazer offers us, in Sexual Reorientation, an appealing and intuitive way to deal with the difficulty of bisexual identity, an identity that has always fit uneasily and sometimes quite unhappily in the LGBT rights movement. If the principal problem of bisexuality is its very temporal changeability, its tendency to dissolve into heterosexuality or homosexuality depending on the gender of one's sexual partner, then Glazer's solution is elegant. She proposes that we bifurcate (so to speak) sexual orientation into two subcategories and acknowledge for everyone both a general and a specific orientation. General orientation "is the sex toward which …
The Law Of Gender Stereotyping And The Work-Family Conflicts Of Men, 2012 University of Florida Levin College of Law
The Law Of Gender Stereotyping And The Work-Family Conflicts Of Men, Stephanie Bornstein
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article looks back to the early equal protection jurisprudence of the 1970s and Ruth Bader Ginsburg's litigation strategy of using men as plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases to cast a renewed focus on antidiscrimination law as a means to redress the work-family conflicts of men. From the beginning of her litigation strategy as the head of the ACLU Women's Rights Project, Ginsburg defined sex discrimination as the detrimental effects of gender stereotypes that constrained both men and women from living their lives as they wished-not solely the minority status of women. The same sex-based stereotypes that kept women out …
Fisher V. Grutter, 2012 Georgetown University Law Center
Fisher V. Grutter, Girardeau A. Spann
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
There is no reason for the Supreme Court to have granted certiorari in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Unless, of course, the Court plans to overrule Grutter v. Bollinger—the case on which the Texas affirmative action plan at issue in Fisher was based. If that is its plan, the Court can invalidate the Texas program on some narrow ground that masks the magnitude of what it is doing. Or it can explicitly overrule Grutter—a case that no longer commands majority support on a Supreme Court whose politics of affirmative action has now been refashioned by …
De-Concentrating Poverty: De-Constructing A Theory And The Failure Of Hope, 2012 Georgetown University Law Center
De-Concentrating Poverty: De-Constructing A Theory And The Failure Of Hope, Michael R. Diamond
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Since the late 1980s, led by William Julius Wilson’s The Truly Disadvantaged, scholars have been writing about the social problems caused by the concentration in residential communities of high levels of poverty. Even before Wilson’s book, government policy, which previously had resulted in racially and economically segregated communities, had begun to shift towards de-concentration. The consent decree in Hills v Gautreaux, and the HOPE VI and Moving to Opportunity Programs all pointed towards de-concentration of poverty. Commentators have suggested both benign and not-so-benign reasons for the policy shift.
There were a variety of quite hopeful goals promoted by …