Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Custodian Or Not: Scrivener's Error In A Bankruptcy Code Safe Harbor, Thomas E. Plank

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

This Article analyzes a drafting error in the United States Bankruptcy Code that remained latent for 36 years until 2020. This drafting error limits a safe harbor that Congress enacted in 1984 and expanded in 2005 to protect an important segment of the securities and mortgage loan markets.

When a person becomes a debtor in bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Code imposes an automatic stay on substantially all actions by creditors and other entities against the debtor or the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. It also abrogates contractual provisions, known as ipso facto clauses, that otherwise permit a party to terminate a contract because …

Bankruptcy And The State, Adam Feibelman

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Anticipating a wave of bankruptcies caused by the economic and financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous commentators proposed measures to expand the institutional capacity of the bankruptcy system. A number of these proposals would represent dramatic and systematic government involvement in the U.S. bankruptcy system. Such involvement by the government in the bankruptcy system is a topic that is largely ignored in the literature on bankruptcy. Where it is observed, it is generally criticized. Among other things, it sits uneasily with dominant theories of bankruptcy that assume the bankruptcy system should be driven by the interests of direct stakeholders …

Bankruptcy And The Anti-Assignment Acts: A New Approach To The Issue Of Assumption And Assignability Of Government Contracts, Ha Khuong

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

One of the most important and valuable tools that a business debtor has for reorganization under the bankruptcy proceedings is assuming and assigning executory contracts. However, circuit courts are divided on the issue of whether the Anti-Assignment Act, in conjunction with Section 365(c)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, prohibits the assumption of an executory government contract over the objection of the government where the contract is to be performed by the debtor-in-possession. Some circuit courts apply the “Hypothetical Test” which restricts a debtor-in-possession from assuming an executory contract over an objection if applicable law would bar assignment to a hypothetical third …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Having Your Cake And Eating It Too: Why Voluntary Post-Petition 401(K) Contributions Are Disposable Income, Austin S. Howell

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Following the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, the majority of chapter 13 debtors have been successful in minimizing their repayment obligations to creditors while bolstering their financial stability during retirement. The Bankruptcy Code allows chapter 13 debtors to retain their assets and repay their debts to creditors using their earned income. Alternatively, debtors may simply avoid some of the liability by dedicating a portion of their earned income for reasonably necessary expenses. Judicial inconsistencies have emerged concerning whether voluntary post-petition 401(k) retirement contributions for chapter 13 debtors constitute disposable income in accordance with Sections 541(b)(7) and 1325(b) of the …

The "Ideal Debtor" And The "Traditional" American Household, A. Mechele Dickerson

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Laws that award governmental benefits reflect an archetype of the type of person deemed worthy of governmental assistance and generally favor and reward people who have specific personal attributes or who engage in activities deemed socially desirable. Just as the Bankruptcy Code favors the “Ideal Debtor,” state and federal laws favor and subsidize Americans who live in a “traditional household.” Historically, this household consisted of husbands who earned income in the paid labor market and wives who stayed home to provide unpaid care for their husbands and minor children. Households that deviated from that norm rarely received the full range …

The Hardship Discharge And How It Can Improve Debtor Success, Abbie Schmadeke

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Chapter 13 bankruptcy has long been heralded as a moral alternative to chapter 7 liquidations. Despite this, success among chapter 13 debtors is limited, and debtors who opt for this route face other challenges. The hardship discharge allows chapter 13 debtors to receive a discharge of their debts without plan completion. While the provision has been a piece of the bankruptcy law for nearly a century, little research on its effects on debtors exists. The struggles that chapter 13 debtors face underlies the need for more research on the hardship discharge as a potential solution. This Comment seeks to utilize …

Portraits Of Bankruptcy Filers, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Deborah Thorne

Scholarly Works

One in ten adult Americans have turned to the consumer bankruptcy system for help. For the past almost forty years, the only systematic data collection about the people who file bankruptcy comes from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project (CBP), for which we serve as co-principal investigators. In this Article, we use CBP data from 2013 to 2019 to describe who is using the bankruptcy system, providing the first comprehensive overview of bankruptcy filers in thirty years. We use principal component analysis to leverage these data to identify distinct groups of people who file bankruptcy. This technique allows us to situate the …

Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic, Pamela Foohey, Dalie Jimenez, Christopher K. Odinet

Scholarly Works

As part of federal and state relief programs created during the COVID-19 pandemic, many American households received pauses on their largest debts, particularly on mortgages and student loans. Others may have come to agreements with their lenders, likewise pausing or altering payment on other debts, such as auto loans and credit cards. This relief allowed households to allocate their savings and income to necessary expenses, like groceries, utilities, and medicine. But forbearance does not equal forgiveness. At the end of the various relief periods and moratoria, people will have to resume paying all their debts, the amounts of which may …

Bankruptcy Grifters, Lindsey Simon

Scholarly Works

Grifters take advantage of situations, latching on to others for benefits they do not deserve. Bankruptcy has many desirable benefits, especially for mass-tort defendants. Bankruptcy provides a centralized proceeding for resolving claims and a forum of last resort for many companies to aggregate and resolve mass-tort liability. For the debtor-defendant, this makes sense. A bankruptcy court’s tremendous power represents a well-considered balance between debtors who have a limited amount of money and many claimants seeking payment.

But courts have also allowed the Bankruptcy Code’s mechanisms to be used by solvent, nondebtor companies and individuals facing mass-litigation exposure. These “bankruptcy grifters” …

Private Student Loans May Be Dischargeable In Bankruptcy Without Meeting The Undue Hardship Requirement And If Not, There Are Two Ways To Prove Undue Hardship, Kimberly Lee

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 523 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) prevents former students from discharging certain educational debts in bankruptcy, unless the failure to discharge “would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” Typically, it is a debtor’s burden to show that their loans may be discharged on the grounds of “undue hardship.” However, Congress has not defined “undue hardship” leaving jurisdictions divided regarding the appropriate test. Most courts have followed the Brunner three-prong test, while only the First and Eighth Circuits use the totality of the circumstances test.

Additionally, section 523(a)(8) …

Analysis Of Courts' Discretion To Enforce Arbitration Of Core Claims, Sarah L. Hautzinger

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In general, a bankruptcy court has original and exclusive jurisdiction of chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. However, problems arise when a prepetition contract contains an arbitration clause, and a court must decide if it has discretion to enforce arbitration of a core claim. The statutes that play essential (but competing) roles in a court's analysis are the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). In sum, "bankruptcy policy exerts an inexorable pull towards centralization while arbitration policy advocates a decentralized approach toward dispute resolution."

In these cases, a bankruptcy court must determine if there …

Availability Of Setoff To Foreign Debtors And Representatives In U.S. Courts, Joseph Muschitiello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Setoff is the principle of allowing a party to reduce the debt it owes to an entity by applying a credit for any claim it has against the same entity. The purpose of setoff rights is rooted in “avoiding the absurdity of making A pay B when B owes A.” It is meant to be used by debtors as affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Section 553 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) generally preserves the right of setoff in bankruptcy cases.

This memorandum explores how and when foreign debtors and representatives may exercise setoff rights …

Equitable Subordination Of A Claim Depends On Insider Status, Conduct Of The Claimant, And If There Was Harm, Nicholas Smargiassi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Equitable subordination is a remedial doctrine pursuant to which a creditor’s claim may be subordinated to other claims. The doctrine is designed to “undo or to offset any inequality in the claim position of a creditor that will produce injustice or unfairness to other creditors in terms of the bankruptcy results.” Equitable subordination is codified in section 510(c) of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). Section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code “authorizes a bankruptcy court to ‘subordinate for purposes of distribution all or part of an allowed claim to all or part of another allowed …

The Barton Doctrine's Applicability To Suits Against Bankruptcy Trustees When The Bankruptcy Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over The Matter, Chelsea Frankel

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In Barton v. Barbour, the Supreme Court established the general rule that a lawsuit cannot be brought against a receiver for acts done within their authority without leave of the court that appointed such receiver. The Court precluded a personal injury suit against a company's receiver without leave of the appointing court, finding that if the plaintiff were permitted to recover on his personal injury claim against the receiver, he would be recovering from the receivership property "without regard to the rights of other creditors or the orders of the court which is administering the trust property." The …

Ownership Status Of Inherited Retirement Accounts In Bankruptcy, Aron Kaplan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Immediately upon filing a petition for relief under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy estate is created by operation of law that consists of the debtor’s assets from which the creditors will be repaid. The Bankruptcy Code states that the estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” This broad language reflects Congress’s intent that there be sufficient assets in the estate to protect the interests of creditors.

Despite this broad legislative language, there are certain categories of property that the debtor …

Fdcpa Claims: Are Intangible Injuries “Concrete” Injuries?, Kimberly Moyal

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) was passed to prohibit a debt collector from engaging in abusive debt collection practices. The FDCPA serves to protect a consumer by giving a consumer a statutory claim against an abusive debt collector. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, ruled that a party pursuing a statutory claim, like an FDCPA claim, must meet the Article III standing requirements of the U.S. Constitution. To establish the first element of the Article III standing analysis, the plaintiff must prove that they suffered a “concrete and particularized” injury.

After …

A Hotel Does Not Meet The Definition Of "Single Asset Real Estate" And May Reorganize Under Subchapter V Of Chapter 11 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Patrick Canavan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Enacted via the Small Business Reorganization Act ("SBRA") in 2019, Subchapter V streamlines the reorganization process, allowing small business debtors to file bankruptcy in a timely and cost-effective manner. The goal behind the legislation is to encourage reorganizations, which will generally result in creditors receiving a higher distribution than in a liquidation and more small businesses surviving. Section 1182(1) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") limits those who can file a Subchapter V case to a "small business debtor" who does not own a "single asset real estate" project ("SARE"). Thus, if the debtor …

The Effect Of Insider Status On The Court's Approval Of A Key Employee Retention Plan, Perry Chresomales

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a company that has filed for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") seeks to retain essential employees through the course of its bankruptcy, the payments made with the goal of retaining key employees are subject to the requirements of section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. These payment plans, also known as Key Employee Retention Plans or "KERPs", are designed to "provide certain Key Employees with a financial incentive to forgo seeking alternative employment during the Debtors' bankruptcy proceeding as well as after confirmation of a chapter 11 plan." In …

Courts Apply A Case-By-Case Analysis In Distinguishing A Meritorious Motion To Disqualify From A Delaying Litigation Tactic, Cathrena Collins

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

It is becoming increasingly rare for an attorney to remain at the same firm for an entire career. Lateral movements of lawyers coupled with large firms employing hundreds of attorneys creates ample opportunity for conflicts of interest to arise. The American Bar Association explains a conflict of interest is present when "there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the other lawyer's responsibilities or interest." Furthermore, Rule 1.10(b) dictates that a lawyer joining a new firm …