Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Economic Structural Transformation And Litigation: Evidence From Chinese Provinces, To Economic Change And Restructuring, Doug Bujakowski, Joan Schmit

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The "Business Interruption" Insurance Coverage Conundrum: Covid-19 Presents A Challenge, Paul E. Traynor

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Misalighned Incentives In Markets: Envisioning Finance That Benefits All Of Society, Dr. Ryan Clements

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Section 546(E) Redux—The Proper Framework For The Construction Of The Terms Financial Institution And Financial Participant Contained In The Bankruptcy Code After The U.S. Supreme Court’S Holding In Merit, Peter V. Marchetti

Cardozo Law Review

This Article discusses and analyzes the proper framework for the construction of the terms “financial institution” and “financial participant” as defined in Sections 101(22)(A) and 101(22A) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code), as they work in tandem with Section 546(e) of the Code. In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Merit, which held that the language regarding transfers “made by or to (or for the benefit of) . . . a financial institution” contained in Section 546(e) does not insulate the ultimate transferee of a constructive fraudulent action (a CFTA) simply because the company being …

The Revival Of Student Loan Discharge In Bankruptcy By The Tenth And Second Circuits, Biqi Chen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Monsanto: Creator Of Cancer Liability

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Impact Of Corporate Response To Controversial Presidential Statements Or Policies

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Chief Loophole Officer Or Chief Legal Officer: Inside Lehman Brothers—A Film Case Study About Corporate And Legal Ethics, Garrick Apollon

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

This Article discusses the continuing legal education (CLE) visual advocacy documentary-style program, which Garrick Apollon (author of this Article) researched and developed. The case study for this CLE documentary-style program is the film Inside Lehman Brothers—a documentary film by Jennifer Deschamps which chronicles the story of the Lehman whistleblowers. The film presents Mathew Lee, former senior vice president overseeing Lehman’s global balance sheet; Oliver Budde, former in-house counsel (associate general counsel) of the Lehman Brothers; and the racialized female mid-tier manager whistleblowers, who all paid a steep price in the 2008 American subprime mortgage crisis, while many of the …

True Sales Or Secured Transactions? The Contract Is Not Dispositive, Daniel Mosayov

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Receivables are debts owed to a company for goods or services. A company seeking liquidity may sell the future interest in receivables generated through operations or use the future interest in receivables as collateral to secure a loan. The parties’ rights will vary depending on whether the receivables are sold or used as collateral. If sold, the buyer holds absolute ownership of the acquired receivables protected from other interests. If the transaction is a loan, the lender holds a security interest in the receivables, which may be junior to other interests.

A bankruptcy court can recharacterize a transaction as …

A Foreign Debtor Who Lacks Permanent Residence In The U.S. May Qualify For Florida’S Homestead Exemption, Jenna Kirkland

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The home has special significance under Florida law, as public policy favors property ownership, citizen independence, and preserving a home where a family can be sheltered and “live beyond the reach of economic misfortune.” Generally, once an individual files for bankruptcy, all property of the debtor becomes property of the estate. However, Section 522 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) allows a debtor to exempt certain property from the estate. The Bankruptcy Code permits states to opt out of the federal exemption scheme provided. Florida is one of the states that has opted out, therefore …

The Features And Limitations Of Asbestos Settlement Trusts: A Primer, Michael Quintman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 524 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) prevents creditors from recovering pre-bankruptcy debts after plan approval if their recovery was not already provided for in the approved bankruptcy plan. Subsection (g) of section 524 provides a special procedure for debtors previously engaged in the sale or production of asbestos-containing products to restructure while ensuring those injured through exposure to those products are compensated. In particular, section 524(g) provides for the formation of a trust that can settle asbestos related tort claims after the plan has been confirmed by a bankruptcy court. These trusts are …

Chapter 15 Recognition Is Necessary For Efficient And Consistent Cross-Border Proceedings, Sarah Franzetti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") was adopted in 2005, it repealed the former section 304, which had often led to ad-hoc and inconsistent rulings for foreign debtors seeking assistance in U.S. bankruptcy courts. The new Chapter was passed to achieve greater efficiency on a domestic scale, as well as the "fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies" by promoting greater cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts. For a foreign debtor to reap the benefits of this cooperation, a representative of the foreign bankruptcy proceeding must petition a U.S. bankruptcy court …

Granting Derivative Standing To A Creditors’ Committee, Jordan Milite

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A party has “standing” (the right to challenge the conduct of another in court) when that person or entity has suffered an “injury in fact.” “Derivative standing” is when a person or entity other than the harmed party steps in to assert the claim in place of the harmed party. In a case under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may grant derivative standing to a creditors’ committee or similar body, rather than the bankruptcy estate itself, to bring a claim on behalf of a debtor’s estate. This often …

The Ability To Set And Enforce Bar Dates And Determine Untimely Administrative Expense Claims In A Chapter 11 Case, Kayla Nieves

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) does not expressly provide that bankruptcy courts may set and enforce deadlines, i.e., “bar dates,” for administrative expense claims. The Bankruptcy Code also does not expressly define “timely” or “tardy” administrative expense claims. Courts, however, have interpreted sections 105 and 503 of the Bankruptcy Code as sufficiently broad to provide bankruptcy courts with discretion to establish bar dates and allow untimely filed administrative expense claims “for cause.”

This memorandum explores the decisions that have addressed a bankruptcy court’s ability to set and enforce bar dates and to determine what …

Constitutionality Of Non-Uniform Quarterly Fees, Michael Francis Pecorella

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the United States, there are two different government entities entrusted with overseeing the administration of cases under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). In all but two states, the Office of the United States Trustee, which is a part of the Department of Justice, oversees the administration of bankruptcy cases. In North Carolina and Alabama, the two states that do not have a United States Trustee system, a Bankruptcy Administrator, which is funded by and housed in the Judicial Conference, oversees the administration of bankruptcy cases. The U.S. Trustees and the Bankruptcy Administrators generally …

When A Critical Vendor May Be Insulated From Preference Liability, Michael A. Solimani

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) a trustee or debtor in possession (“DIP”) may avoid certain payments made by the debtor to a creditor within ninety days prior to filing for bankruptcy, or one year if the creditor is an insider. The Bankruptcy Code contains certain defenses to preference claims. A court may also release a creditor from such claims. Such a release may be found in orders approving payment of pre-petition claims to a “critical vendor.” Absent such an express release, it is unclear whether a trustee or DIP is precluded from pursuing …

Circumstances Under Which A Court Will Dismiss A Chapter 11 Filing Made In Bad Faith, Nicholas Wogan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1112(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may dismiss a Chapter 11 filing “for cause.” It is a generally accepted principle that “for cause” dismissal includes dismissal of filings made in bad faith, and this concept originates in a need for bankruptcy courts to uphold the jurisdictional integrity of the Chapter 11 process from those who would seek to abuse it. Courts deciding whether dismissal for bad faith is warranted typically employ a two-step analysis: first to determine whether a bad faith filing is “cause” for dismissal under section …

Clarity About Comity: How Courts Have Attempted Greater Guidance For Chapter 15 Litigants, Sabrina Lieberman

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Abstract

This note explores the development of courts’ refusal to extend comity to foreign representatives who have filed a proceeding under chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Congress adopted chapter 15 as part of a comprehensive 2005 bankruptcy reform. It allows foreign entities to receive protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In most cases, foreign representatives who file a chapter 15 proceeding are involved with ancillary insolvency proceedings outside the United States. There is often a question of how or if a U.S. court overseeing the chapter 15 proceeding will defer to a judgment or process within the foreign …

Cannabis Receiverships: The Alternative For State Legal Cannabis Businesses Seeking Financial Rehabilitation Locked Out Of Bankruptcy Court By The Controlled Substances Act, Ryan C. Griffith

Seattle University Law Review

This article explores how cannabis businesses suffer by being unable to utilize federal bankruptcy and explore state law receiverships as an alternative remedy to help cannabis businesses weather financial storms.

Part I explores the limitations and differences between a receivership and a bankruptcy. Part II discusses how state legal cannabis companies cannot seek financial rehabilitation in bankruptcy court due to cannabis being listed as a schedule I drug federally. Part III explores how receivership be used to help cannabis companies that cannot seek bankruptcy protection to financially rehabilitate themselves. Part IV details how a receiver can help a cannabis company …

Against Bankruptcy Exceptionalism, Jonathan M. Seymour

Faculty Scholarship

Bankruptcy courts conceive of their mission differently than other courts do. For the Supreme Court, bankruptcy cases are ordinary statutory cases to be resolved “clearly and predictably using well established principles of statutory interpretation.” Many bankruptcy judges, though, believe that bankruptcy courts serve a distinctive mission for which ordinary adjudicative methods do not suffice. Often, that mission is characterized using the language of equity. Judges and commentators alike have observed that among the most spoken words in the bankruptcy courts are: “the bankruptcy court is a court of equity.” Others have contended that bankruptcy necessitates “creativity and flexibility,” pursuant to …