Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Bankruptcy Appeal Barriers, Jonathan M. Seymour

Faculty Scholarship

Appeals in bankruptcy do not look like appeals elsewhere in the federal court system. In particular, bankruptcy appeal barriers are strikingly distinctive. These barriers serve outright to block an appeal from being decided. An appellate court may dismiss an appeal, rather than consider the merits, if facts on the ground have changed so much since the original decision that providing a remedy to an appellant, even if victorious, would not be prudent. Take ongoing litigation in the Boy Scouts bankruptcy case. A plan of reorganization was confirmed fixing the entitlements of victims to compensation. Dissenting creditors argued bitterly the plan …

Alternatives To Delaware? Evaluating Corporate Law In Nevada, Texas, And Wyoming, Joseph Landau, Bailey Swartz, Anthony Rickey, Robert Ragazzo, Benjamin Edwards, George A. Mocsary

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Consider This: Make-Whole Premiums As Unmatured Interest, Kathryn G. Berman

Fordham Law Review

Make-whole premiums have become mainstream in corporate bond indentures because of the protections they provide to lenders. Although they are generally enforceable as a matter of contract law, make-whole premiums have been treated inconsistently in bankruptcy courts in several areas. One point of inconsistency is whether make-whole premiums are treated as liquidated damages or unmatured interest. Such a determination has significant implications on the allowance of the claim and its recovery from an insolvent debtor.

Most bankruptcy courts have treated make-whole premiums as liquidated damages and allowed their recovery in creditors’ claims. In doing so, their analyses have treated liquidated …

Bankruptcy Appeal Barriers, Jonathan M. Seymour

Washington and Lee Law Review

Appeals in bankruptcy do not look like appeals elsewhere in the federal court system. In particular, bankruptcy appeal barriers are strikingly distinctive. These barriers serve outright to block an appeal from being decided. An appellate court may dismiss an appeal, rather than consider the merits, if facts on the ground have changed so much since the original decision that providing a remedy to an appellant, even if victorious, would not be prudent. Take ongoing litigation in the Boy Scouts bankruptcy case. A plan of reorganization was confirmed fixing the entitlements of victims to compensation. Dissenting creditors argued bitterly the plan …

Assessing The Post-Purdue Landscape Of Consensual Third-Party Releases Through Contract Law, Kaori Nagase

American University Law Review

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., the Supreme Court invalidated non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans. In doing so, however, the Court left open the question of what constitutes valid consent to a release. This Comment argues that lower courts must now require a higher threshold of affirmative consent—particularly in mass-tort bankruptcies involving highly culpable non-debtors. In light of Purdue’s implication that third-party releases are anchored in contract law principles, this Comment suggests that courts should evaluate what constitutes adequate consideration for a release.

Debt Tokens, Andrea Tosato, Diane Lourdes Dick, Christopher K. Odinet

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The worlds of crypto and bankruptcy have collided. Once-prominent, fast growing, and even politically influential platforms for trading cryptocurrencies have imploded spectacularly. Gone are the glossy advertisements, celebrity endorsements, and proclamations that blockchain operates as a law unto itself. Instead, insolvent crypto businesses—including the crypto exchange giant FTX—find themselves in bankruptcy court, no different from any other failed enterprise. These bankruptcies reveal a startling reality: individual investors who placed their trust in these platforms have been stripped of their digital assets. In their stead, they hold hard-to-collect claims against these defunct platforms. Amid the chill of the crypto winter, bankruptcy …

Strategies For Unsecured Creditors To Mitigate The Pro-Debtor Policies Of Subchapter V And Suggestions For Changes To The Bankruptcy Code, Micah Mays

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Controlling The Mischief Of New York’S Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Through Constitutional Pre-Emption, Shelby D. Green

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

FAPA aimed to ease the burdens of long-delayed foreclosure proceedings by restating the operation of the statute of limitations. It contains provisions across several sections of state statutes that specify that once the six year statute of limitations on actions to foreclose commences, typically by the acceleration of the balance due on the promissory note and commencement of suit, it continues to run, even after the parties have entered into a workout agreement and have dismissed the complaint. By express terms, the Act had immediate effect, such that those lenders who withdrew complaints pursuant to a workout agreement before the …

Litigation, Reform, And The Opioid Crisis: From Mdl To Bankruptcy, Abbe R. Gluck

Touro Law Review

Can bankruptcy solve a public health crisis? Bankruptcy has taken center stage in complex civil litigation, and the massive opioid litigation is no exception. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2024 decided its first recent case about the intersection of bankruptcy and modern public harms litigation in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., a decision that brought to the fore pressing questions about the increasing use of bankruptcy in mass torts. In raising concerns about bankruptcy courts being used as a “roving commission to solve all such problems” in complex civil litigation,” the case potentially signals the Court’s growing discomfort with creative …

Lambat Asal Selamat: The Slow But Safe Twenty-Five Year Recalibration Of Personal Bankruptcy In Malaysia, Jason J. Kilborn

South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business

A popular Malay proverb advises, “[L]et it be slow, as long as it is safe” (biar lambat asal[kan] selamat),1 combining the sentiments of two similar English proverbs: “haste makes waste,” and “slow and steady wins the race.” These principles certainly seem to have guided Malaysian lawmakers in the quarter-century, multistage development of the most important element of modern bankruptcy law: the discharge. Adopted in 1967,2 Malaysian bankruptcy law has long included a very limited debt discharge, but as it left more and more economically debilitated debtors in perpetual bankruptcy limbo, policymakers became dissatisfied with leaving a huge and growing mass …

Opening Remarks, Douglas J. Whaley

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Acceptance Remarks For The 2025 Distinguished Service Award For Lifetime Achievement, Jay Lawrence Westbrook

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

The Nightmare Loophole: Circumventing Section 365(N) And Erasing A Non-Debtor Licensee’S Intellectual Property Rights, Grant Marshall

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

In today’s knowledge-driven economy, the significance of intellectual property licenses cannot be overstated. Nevertheless, a loophole within the Bankruptcy Code allows a non-debtor’s license agreement to be erased, stripping them of their right to utilize the intellectual property without any avenue for recourse. Selling intellectual property “free and clear” of encumbrances before the debtor rejects the license agreement could deprive the non-debtor licensee of the opportunity to continue using the intellectual property. This loophole not only undermines the policy goals of both intellectual property and bankruptcy, but also subverts the clear intentions of Congress and the Supreme Court to protect …

Climate Adaptation And Bankruptcy: Preparing Utilities For What Is To Come, Hayley Roy

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Climate change is an existential crisis that has and will continue to impact every aspect of our daily lives. An overlooked component of life in the United States, except in times of crisis, is our energy grid, which will continuously feel the consequences of climate change. Electricity is a basic necessity for most people in the U.S., but it is underprepared for the realities of climate change. Climate adaptation is a necessary step forward that energy utilities must take to ensure the resilience and reliability of electricity. Failure to adequately adapt will lead to dangerous situations as seen in the …

Testing The Waters: Expanding Chapter 9 Bankruptcy To Encourage Treatment Of Chemically Contaminated Drinking Water, Alexandra Zimmer

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Chemical contamination of drinking water supplies has become a significant issue across the globe with serious health and safety impacts. While the true extent of the impact is still being determined, costs associated with remediation efforts to clean up are astonishing. Municipalities, in particular cities, towns, and counties, suffer significant damages both through costs incurred directly for treatment of chemically contaminated drinking water supplies and through lost revenues resulting from municipal residents’ exposure.

This Comment argues Congress should expand municipal access to filing for bankruptcy under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code to encourage local government efforts to clean up …

A Commitment Rule For Insolvency Forum: A Response To Critics, Anthony J. Casey, Aurelio Gurrea-Martinez, Robert K. Rasmussen

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Party Commitment And Flexibility In Corporate Restructuring, Robert K. Rasmussen

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Defending "Second-Party" Releases In Mass Tort Bankruptcies, Brook E. Gotberg, Annette W. Jarvis

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The Bankruptcy Code enables corporate debtors to restructure their debts, including liability for tort damages. Recovery from an insolvent debtor poses daunting collective action problems for tort victims. By creating and funding a trust in bankruptcy, the liable company can streamline settlement and distribute available assets to give all claimants—including individuals who have been harmed by the company’s past activity but are not yet aware of the harm—an aliquot portion of available funds.

Frequently, tort damages levied against a bankrupt company implicate not only the debtor but other related parties, like the company’s insurers, directors and officers, corporate affiliates, and …

Full Discharge Ahead? An Empirical First Look At The New Student Loan Discharge Process In Bankruptcy, Belisa Pang, Dalié Jiménez, Matthew Adam Bruckner

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The legal framework for discharging student loan debt held by bankruptcy filers cases changed in November 2022 with the Biden Administration’s Department of Justice issuing its “Guidance for Department Attorneys Regarding Student Loan Bankruptcy Litigation,” fundamentally altering the legal framework for discharging student loan debt in bankruptcy cases. The Guidance aims to enhance consistency and equity by: (1) ensuring transparent and consistent expectations; (2) reducing the burden on debtors; and (3) making it easier for DOJ attorneys to recommend discharging a debtor’s student loans. The DOJ has touted the new Guidance as having “made a real difference in borrowers’ lives,” …

Introduction: A Tribute To Professor Jay L. Westbrook, Barbara Wilkie, Molly Wilson

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.