Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

This Is Not A Game: The Addictive Allure Of Digital Companions, Nizan Geslevich Packin, Karni Chagal-Feferkorn

Seattle University Law Review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents have become an inescapable part of modern childhood, reshaping education, leisure activities, entertainment, and social interaction. From AI-powered tutors that adapt to individual learning styles to emotionally responsive chatbots that simulate human companionship, these systems promise unprecedented personalization, cognitive stimulation, and social support. However, these benefits mask significant risks that remain unregulated and inadequately addressed.

Although adults are also susceptible to forming deep emotional bonds with AI companions—often trusting them as if they possessed genuine understanding and empathy—children are particularly vulnerable. Their misplaced trust can more severely distort social development, weaken critical thinking, and foster unhealthy …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Responding To Digital Addiction, Ned Snow

Seattle University Law Review

In Unwired: Gaining Control over Addictive Technologies, Professor Gaia Bernstein calls our attention to the growing problem of digital addiction. Digital addiction may sound like something out of a science-fiction novel or something that does not raise the same sort of real-life practical concerns as are present in a physical health crisis or an economic decline. But as Bernstein presents the evidence, we learn that the consequences of digital addiction can be just as harmful as a serious disease or a financial depression. Cognitive development disorders, anxiety, emotional depression, social isolation, and other mental health ills can be debilitating—as much …

Uptier Debt Exchange Transactions: A Winner-Take-All Battle In The Leveraged Loan Market, Angela Chang

Brooklyn Law Review

This Note explores the legal implications of uptier debt exchange transactions (UDETs) in the syndicated loan market. These transactions are restructuring strategies that allow distressed companies to exchange existing debt for “superpriority” debt, often to the detriment of excluded creditors. The Bankruptcy Code aims to balance debtor relief with creditor rights, but, as this Note demonstrates, UDETs exploit ambiguities in credit agreements to shift priorities in favor of certain lenders. This Note examines the pivotal case of In re Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC, a decision which highlighted the need for creditors to reassess whether the flexibility of their credit agreements …

Congressional Tribal Trust Responsibility And The Opioid Mdl: A Call To Finish The Work The Judiciary Was Forced To Undertake, Curtis E. Osceola Esq.

University of Miami Law Review

Congressional inaction has forced Native American Tribes to utilize the judiciary as a last resort to obtain relief from the crippling effects of the opioid epidemic. Tribes have received inadequate funding from settlements to abate the widespread use of prescription opiates on and around their lands of concern. Hundreds of mass tort lawyers have been navigating the In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL 2804)—one of the largest and most valuable litigation pools in the history of the Republic—in an effort to provide relief for cities and counties, individuals, consumers, hospitals, third-party payors, and federally recognized Tribes. Based on …

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Approach To The Subjective Prong Of The Ordinary Course Of Business Defense, Andrew Cardello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The ordinary course of business defense (the "OCB Defense") to preference claims under section 547(c)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") protects transfers that are consistent with previous transactions between a debtor and creditor. In evaluating this defense, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court") conducts a fact-intensive inquiry into whether the challenged transfers were consistent with the parties’ previously established business practices. Key considerations include the length and regularity of the relationship, the timing and method of the transactions, and the absence of aggressive collection tactics …

A Lawyer’S Duty To Maintain Prospective Client Confidentiality To Avoid Disqualification In Bankruptcy Matters, Victoria Rey

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The legal profession imposes strict ethical duties on attorneys to maintain client confidentiality. While this duty is traditionally associated with formal attorney-client relationships, it also extends to prospective clients–individuals who consult an attorney about potential representation, even if they do not ultimately retain the attorney. In bankruptcy proceedings, where prospective clients often disclose sensitive financial information, the duty of confidentiality is crucial. This duty is essential for preserving the integrity of the bankruptcy process, preventing conflicts of interest, and ensuring fairness for all parties involved. As a result, a breach of this duty may warrant the disqualification of counsel. …

Insurers Have Standing To Object To Reorganization Plans, Haley Daniels

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1109 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") allows any "party in interest" to raise, appear, and be heard on any issue in a chapter 11 bankruptcy case. The term party in interest is not otherwise defined in the Bankruptcy Code. The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the phrase to describe a party that has a sufficient stake in the outcome of the bankruptcy reorganization. Importantly, Section 1128(b) of the Bankruptcy Code explicitly provides that a party in interest "may object to confirmation of a plan" in a chapter 11 case.

The United …

Executory Contract Provisions That Provide Solely For An Equitable Remedy Are Enforceable Post-Rejection., Ashley Romeo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Section 365(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), "a trustee [or debtor in possession], subject to the court’s approval, may assume, or reject an executory contract." Generally, a contract is executory if "performance remains due to some extent on both sides." In general, a debtor may decide whether its executory contract is a good deal going forward. The debtor will likely want to reject a contract that is no longer a good deal in order to repudiate any further performance of its duties. When reviewing the trustee or debtor-in-possession’s decision to assume or …

Property Of The Estate Under Section 541—Accrual Of Causes Of Action And The "Sufficiently Rooted" Test, Hayung Park

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

This article examines the scope of property included in a bankruptcy estate under section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, with a focus on causes of action arising both before and after the bankruptcy petition date. Courts apply a two-part analysis to determine whether a claim is part of the estate: (1) whether it accrued as of the petition date, and (2) whether a post-petition claim is sufficiently rooted in the pre-bankruptcy past. This article explores how courts interpret and apply these components to determine estate property.

Adjudicatory Comity As An Alternative To Recognition Under Chapter 15 Of The Bankruptcy Code For Foreign Bankruptcy Proceedings, Janet Wong

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the absence of Chapter 15 recognition, foreign debtors may still rely on the doctrine of adjudicatory comity for recognition of a foreign order in some instances. However, because of the limitations on the applicability of adjudicatory comity alone, Chapter 15 recognition may be a safer option for foreign debtors.

In 2005, Congress enacted Chapter 15 under Title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") to "provide effective mechanisms for dealing with cases of cross-border insolvency." Under Chapter 15, a foreign representative may apply to the court for recognition of a foreign bankruptcy proceeding. Upon recognition of …

Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases From Mass-Tort Liabilities Cannot Be Part Of A Chapter 11 Plan, Seth Woodhall

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a process that has allowed many corporations to "work with its creditors to develop a reorganization plan governing the distribution of the estate’s assets[.]" Under 11 U.S.C. §1141(a) once the bankruptcy court confirms the plan, that plan becomes legally binding on the debtor and all creditors—including those who may have not agree to it. "Some plan terms are mandatory, §1123(a); others are optional, §1123(b). [Terms permitting a third-party release] is a provision a debtor may include and a court may approve in a reorganization plan." By presenting a plan to the bankruptcy court as part …

Applicability Of Section 109(A)’S Debtor Eligibility Requirements To Chapter 15 Cases, Aisha K. Sabar

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon a petition for recognition, a foreign insolvency case may be recognized in the United States under chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). Courts are divided as to whether section 109(a)’s debtor eligibility requirements, which apply to U.S. bankruptcy cases, apply to a chapter 15 case. In the Second Circuit, a foreign representative will have to demonstrate that the debtor satisfies section 109(a)’s requirement of being "a person who resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States, or a municipality," while debtors situated in the …

The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine In The Bankruptcy Context, Brendan Mclaughlin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An unfavorable state court judgment can lead to the losing party seeking a second bite at the apple in federal court, but the Rooker-Feldman doctrine blocks second attempts with limited exceptions. The jurisdictional doctrine is derived from two United States Supreme Court cases: Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, where the collective holdings stand for the principle that a state court judgment is conclusive and that the lower federal courts lack jurisdiction to review such judgments. The Supreme Court is the only federal court authorized to review state court judgments. …

The Valuation Of Crypto Currency Mining Property Under 11 U.S.C. § 506(A)(1), Michael Galletti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 506(a)(1) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") provides that a secured creditor's claim is "a secured claim to the extent of the value of such creditor's interest in the estate's interest in such property . . . and is an unsecured claim to the extent that the value of such creditor's interest . . . is less than the amount of such allowed claim." The valuation of collateral is determined "in light of the purpose of the valuation and of the proposed disposition or use of such property." However, the Bankruptcy Code is …

The Objective Establishment Of A Ponzi Scheme Is Sufficient To Establish A Debtor’S "Actual Intent To Defraud" Creditors In Fraudulent Conveyance Actions, Sarah Wilkinson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A business entity that meets the objective elements of a Ponzi scheme gives rise to the presumption that a debtor possesses the requisite mens rea—the "actual intent to defraud" creditors—in fraudulent conveyance actions. Section 548 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") "authorizes a trustee to avoid any transfer of funds made by a debtor with (a) an 'actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud' creditors; or (b) for less than a 'reasonably equivalent value,' among other criteria." Fraudulent conveyance actions are "often called 'clawback' actions." These actions "seek to recover the false returns received …

Rejection Of An Executory Contract Does Not Invalidate Rights Exercised Or Performance Rendered Prior To Rejection, Samantha B. Caraballo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), a trustee or a debtor in possession may "reject" an executory contract. Rejection results in a breach of contract. Courts consider non-bankruptcy contract law to determine the impact of the breach on the executory contract. In general, rejection does not undo a party’s past performance or exercise of rights under the contract. Instead, it relieves a debtor from its future obligation to perform.

Part I of this Article explains the different approaches to defining "executory contract." Part II of this Article elaborates on a trustee …

Reconsideration Of A Previously Allowed Or Disallowed Claim Under Section 502(J) Of The Bankruptcy Code In New York And Delaware., Kalina Mesrobian

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 502(j) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") states that "[a] claim that has been allowed or disallowed may be reconsidered for cause" in a bankruptcy case. 11 U.S.C.S. §502(j). Section 502(j) further states that "a reconsidered claim may be allowed or disallowed according to the equities of the case." Id. There is no definition of "for cause" or "according to the equities of the case," but the courts have generally held that reconsideration ultimately "lies within the discretion of the court." This article will analyze the scenarios under which a bankruptcy court in …

Debtors Entitled To Only Prospective Relief For Extra Trustee Fees Paid Under Unconstitutional Amendment To Section 1930 Trustee Fee Statute, Joseph Parone

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The United States Trustee Program comprises eighty-eight of the ninety-four Federal judicial districts. The U.S. Trustee Program is funded through the United States Trustee System Fund, a large portion from debtor trustee fees. U.S. Trustee districts are required to implement the trustee fee structure outlined by the Section 1930 fee statute, which is updated through congressional amendment. However, the Judicial Conference, which oversees the Bankruptcy Administrator Program, had discretion to impose trustee fees outlined in section 1930 on debtors within the remaining six Federal judicial districts under their administration.

In the backdrop of this legislative scheme is the Uniformity …

U.S. Court’S Role In Approving The Sale Of U.S. Assets In A Chapter 15 Case, Jamie Vang

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 cases deal with cross-border insolvency and allow U.S. courts to recognize foreign bankruptcy proceedings and cooperate with foreign courts. Upon recognition of a foreign main proceeding, section 363 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") will apply to the transfer of U.S. assets. However, the standard for approving a sale under section 363 in a chapter 15 case is not specified.

This article analyzes the bankruptcy court decisions on whether chapter 15 requires U.S. courts to conduct their own individual analysis or to defer to the foreign court in approving the sale of …