Torts Commons^™

Case No. 17 - Brain Abscess And Meningitis Following A Dental Abscess In 38 Year Old Woman, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Brain Abscess and Meningitis Following a Dental Abscess in 38 year old Woman

Case No. 16 - Maternal Death In A Patient Who Had Rheumatic Heart Disease, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Maternal Death in a Patient who had Rheumatic Heart Disease

Case No. 20 - Diagnosis And Treatment Of Meningitis In A 3 Week Old Child Who Sustained A Spinal Cord Infarct Following A Cardiac Arrest, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Diagnosis and Treatment of Meningitis in a 3 Week Old Child who Sustained a Spinal Cord Infarct Following a Cardiac Arrest

Case No. 21 - Trauma In Pregnancy, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Trauma in Pregnancy

Case No. 25 - Death Of A 25 Year Old Woman In A Hospital’S Micu With Sepsis And Septic Shock, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Death of a 25 year old Woman in a Hospital’s MICU with Sepsis and Septic Shock

Case No. 23 - Hypertensive Brain Bleed In A 10 Year Old With Undiagnosed Kidney Disease, New York Law School

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Cases

Anonymous Closed Medical Liability Case - Hypertensive Brain Bleed in a 10 year old with Undiagnosed Kidney Disease

Online Defamation, Legal Concepts, And The Good Samaritan, Benjamin C. Zipursky

Valparaiso University Law Review

No abstract provided.

You As A Brand: A Legal History, Lyrissa Lidsky

Faculty Publications

Dr. Samantha Barbas’ book, Laws of Image: Privacy and Publicity in America, makes an original, important, and engaging contribution to the history of the privacy law in the United States. In the process, the book illuminates how we became a culture obsessed with image management and how the law developed and continues to evolve to protect our rights to become our own personal brands.

Private Dollars For Public Litigation: An Introduction, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

The article argues that litigation investment—where third-party funders provide capital for lawsuits in exchange for a share of potential recoveries—should be extended to public litigation. It contends that the economic rationale for litigation investment applies equally to public entities, such as state Attorneys General, as it does to private litigants. The author highlights the funding gap in public litigation, particularly in large-scale cases against well-resourced defendants, and suggests that litigation investment could address this gap more effectively than contingent fee arrangements with private attorneys.

Editor's Introduction To The Symposium "Macpherson At 100: Reflections On Its Influence", Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

The article introduces a symposium that challenges the conventional narrative of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. as a decisive victory over the privity rule. It argues that the case's actual influence is more nuanced, misunderstood, or absent than commonly believed, suggesting that the meaning of landmark decisions is shaped by subsequent interpretation rather than the ruling alone.

Privacy As Quasi-Property, Lauren Henry Scholz

Scholarly Publications

Courts and commentators struggle to apply privacy law in a way that conforms to the intuitions of the average person. It is often assumed that the reason for this discrepancy is the absence of an agreed upon conceptual definition of privacy. In fact, the lack of a description of the interest invaded in a privacy matter is the more substantial hurdle. This Article provides such a description of the privacy interest.

Privacy is quasi-property. Quasi-property is a relational entitlement to exclude. Unlike real property, there is no freestanding right to exclude from a quasi-property interest absent reference to a relationship …

Is It Time To Adopt A No-Fault Scheme To Compensate Injured Patients?, Elaine Gibson

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The tort system is roundly indicted for its inadequacies in providing compensation in response to injury. More egregious is its response to injuries incurred due to negligence in the provision of healthcare services specifically. Despite numerous calls for reform, tort-based compensation has persisted as the norm to date. However, recent developments regarding physician malpractice lead to consideration of the possibility of a move to “no-fault” compensation for healthcare-related injuries. In this paper, I explore these developments, examine programs in various foreign jurisdictions which have adopted no-fault compensation for medical injury, and discuss the wisdom and feasibility of adopting an administratively-based …

"Should" Or "Must"?: Distinguishing Mandates From Guidelines In Tort Claims Contexts, A.G. Harmon

Scholarly Articles

This Article intends to bring some order to the discussion, both by

means of explaining what the science of the language arts—linguistics—says

about the matter, and by explaining how that science comports with what courts

think they are doing when they determine a government statement is, or is not,

a mandate. Linguists have considered language crimes before, relating to

perjury, bribery, and criminal threats, and I myself have conducted a linguistic

analysis with regard to the civil law Tarasoff context (i.e., “duties to warn”),

but a linguistic analysis of mandates as opposed to guidelines has not yet been

attempted.

Part …

Modernizing Informed Consent: Expanding The Boundaries Of Materiality, Nadia N. Sawicki

Faculty Publications & Other Works

Informed consent law’s emphasis on the disclosure of purely medical information – such as diagnosis, prognosis, and the risks and benefits of various treatment alternatives – does not accurately reflect modern understandings of how patients make medical decisions. Existing common law disclosure duties fail to capture a variety of non-medical factors relevant to patients, including information about the physician’s personal characteristics; the cost of treatment; the social implications of various health care interventions; and the legal consequences associated with diagnosis and treatment. Although there is a wealth of literature analyzing the merits of such disclosures in a few narrow contexts, …

Punish The Crown, But Protect The Government: A Comparative Analysis Of State Tort Liability For Exemplary Damages In England And Punitive Damages In The United States, Bradley Raboin

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the contrasting approaches of the United States and England regarding punitive and exemplary damages in tort claims against the government. While the U.S. prohibits punitive damages against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), England allows exemplary damages against the Crown in specific cases. The author argues that England's approach, which holds the government accountable through exemplary damages, is preferable and suggests that the U.S. should consider a similar, regulated approach to enhance government accountability.

Impact From Texas Tort Law On Damages Recovered, Richard Samuel Harris

CMC Senior Theses

This paper looks at Texas tort law reform to make claims regarding the relationship between Texas tort reform and damages recovered. Starting with reform in 1977, Texas has passed 15 pieces of legislation that, in principle, restrict the damages plaintiffs recover. Most empirical analyses have focused primarily on analyzing behavior resulting from the tort reform. In other cases, research has looked at the impact the most recent reform has had on damages recovered in medical malpractice lawsuits. This paper is the first to study the impact of Texas tort law reform on damages recovered while looking at the entirety of …

Paterno V. Laser Spine Institute: Did The New York Court Of Appeals' Misapplication Of Unjustified Policy Fears Lead To A Miscarriage Of Justice And The Creation Of Inadequate Precedent For The Proper Use Of The Empire State’S Long-Arm Statute?, Jay C. Carlisle, Christine M. Murphy, Kiersten M. Schramek, Marley Strauss

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

This article discusses CPLR section 302(a)(1) as applied by the New York State Court of Appeals in Paterno v. Laser Spine Institute. The Paterno Court failed to properly apply a statutory jurisdictional analysis by conflating it with a due process inquiry. Also, the Court unnecessarily balanced the interests of the Empire State's citizens in having a forum for access to justice with unjustified policy fears of potential costs to the state from assertions of in personam jurisdiction. Furthermore, the Court's policy focus4 on the protection of medical doctors from lawsuits and the prevention of “floodgate” litigation which would adversely affect …

Litigating Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (Iom), Michael Brook, Kary Irle

University of Baltimore Law Review

Statistics regarding surgical medical malpractice are staggering. The annual cost of the medical malpractice liability system has been estimated to be $55.6 billion-2.4% of the total healthcare system.' The median award for plaintiffs in actions involving spinal cords is $2.9 million, and the median value for settlements is $1.45 million. A neurosurgeon will spend approximately eleven years of his or her career with outstanding malpractice claims.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM), also known as surgical neurophysiology, is hardly a novel medical technology. In fact, it has been used in the operating room for over half a century. IOM provides real-time monitoring of …

Tainted: Food, Identity, And The Search For Dignitary Redress, Melissa Mortazavi

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Crowd Crush: How The Law Leaves American Crowds Unprotected, Tracy Hresko Pearl

Faculty Articles

Crowd-related injuries and deaths are startlingly common both in the United States and worldwide. They occur in a wide range of situations and at a vast array of venues: at music concerts, sporting events, and retail holiday sales, and in and around airports, subway platforms, and parking lots, among other locations. These “crowd crush” incidents, however, are extremely underreported and rarely litigated, masking the seriousness of this issue and making it difficult for the few victims who pursue legal recourse to recover damages. Given that there is virtually no statutory law in the United States pertaining to crowd management and …