Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

9,026 Full-Text Articles 6,895 Authors 8,577,575 Downloads 140 Institutions

All Articles in Torts

Faceted Search

9,026 full-text articles. Page 64 of 153.

Acts Of Meaning, Resource Diagrams, And Essential Learning Behaviors: The Design Evolution Of Lost & Found, Owen Gottlieb, Ian Schreiber 2020 Rochester Institute of Technology

Acts Of Meaning, Resource Diagrams, And Essential Learning Behaviors: The Design Evolution Of Lost & Found, Owen Gottlieb, Ian Schreiber

Articles

Lost & Found is a tabletop-to-mobile game series designed for teaching medieval religious legal systems. The long-term goals of the project are to change the discourse around religious laws, such as foregrounding the prosocial aspects of religious law such as collaboration, cooperation, and communal sustainability. This design case focuses on the evolution of the design of the mechanics and core systems in the first two tabletop games in the series, informed by over three and a half years’ worth of design notes, playable prototypes, outside design consultations, internal design reviews, playtests, and interviews.


The Conscience Defense To Malpractice, Nadia N. Sawicki 2020 Loyola University Chicago, School of Law

The Conscience Defense To Malpractice, Nadia N. Sawicki

Faculty Publications & Other Works

This Article presents the first empirical study of state conscience laws that establish explicit procedural protections for medical providers who refuse to participate in providing reproductive health services, including abortion, sterilization, contraception, and emergency contraception.

Scholarship and public debate about law's role in protecting health care providers' conscience rights typically focus on who should be protected, what actions should be protected, and whether there should be any limitations on the exercise of conscience rights. This study, conducted in accordance with best methodological practices from the social sciences for policy surveillance and legal mapping, is the first to provide concrete data …


Ai Entities As Ai Agents: Artificial Intelligence Liability And The Ai Respondeat Superior Analogy, Anat Lior 2020 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Ai Entities As Ai Agents: Artificial Intelligence Liability And The Ai Respondeat Superior Analogy, Anat Lior

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


Torts: Just Walk Away: How An Overbroad Foreseeability Of Harm Standard Could Kill “Curbside Consultations” — Warren V. Dinter, 926 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 2019), Erika Miller 2020 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Torts: Just Walk Away: How An Overbroad Foreseeability Of Harm Standard Could Kill “Curbside Consultations” — Warren V. Dinter, 926 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 2019), Erika Miller

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


Retrievable Images On Social Media Platforms: A Call For A New Privacy Tort, Zahra Takhshid 2020 Harvard Law School

Retrievable Images On Social Media Platforms: A Call For A New Privacy Tort, Zahra Takhshid

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Chilling Effect Claims In ‘Zeran V. Aol’, Jonathon W. Penney 2020 Osgoode Hall Law School of York University

The Chilling Effect Claims In ‘Zeran V. Aol’, Jonathon W. Penney

Articles & Book Chapters

No abstract provided.


Product Liability, Franklin P. Brannen Jr., Marcus Strong, Sean P. Robinson 2020 Mercer University School of Law

Product Liability, Franklin P. Brannen Jr., Marcus Strong, Sean P. Robinson

Mercer Law Review

This Article surveys developments in Georgia product liability law between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2019.1 It covers noteworthy cases decided during this period by the Georgia Supreme Court, Georgia Court of Appeals, and the United States district courts located in Georgia.

  • Product Liability Claims
  • Elements
  • Defenses
  • Spoilation
  • Expert Testimony—The Daubert Standard


Torts, Jarome E. Gautreaux 2020 Mercer University School of Law

Torts, Jarome E. Gautreaux

Mercer Law Review

This Article addresses recent cases decided during the two-year survey period in the area of torts. It includes cases in most of the areas of tort law, including medical malpractice, and addresses defenses such as immunity.

  • Immunity
  • Ante Litem Notices
  • Food Poisoning
  • Premises Liability
  • Medical Negligence
  • Wrongful Death


How Can We End #Cancelculture—Tort Liability Or Thumper’S Rule?, Nanci K. Carr 2020 California State University - Northridge

How Can We End #Cancelculture—Tort Liability Or Thumper’S Rule?, Nanci K. Carr

Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology

In the Disney film Bambi, when the young rabbit Thumper says that Bambi “is kinda wobbly” and “doesn’t walk too good,” Thumper’s mother tells him “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.” The Des Moines Register seems to have forgotten Thumper’s Rule when it uncovered Carson King’s teenage tweets and canceled the relationship he had built with Busch Light while raising $3 million for the Stead Family Children’s Hospital. #CancelCulture is a social media phenomenon, where some people use their voices to cancel the platform enjoyed by others. It is the 2019 equivalent of the …


Science Or Status Quo? Disregard For A Defendant's Mental Illness In Tort Suits, Gabrielle Lindquist 2020 University of Washington School of Law

Science Or Status Quo? Disregard For A Defendant's Mental Illness In Tort Suits, Gabrielle Lindquist

Washington Law Review Online

Mental illness is almost never considered when courts determine whether a defendant is liable for a tort. Nearly every United States jurisdiction—Washington state included—declines to offer a modified “reasonable person” standard for negligent tort defendants with mental illnesses or any form of mental illness-based affirmative defense for intentional tort defendants. There is much debate about whether tort law should evolve to accommodate defendants with mental illnesses. This Comment seeks to dive deeper into why that debate persists.

Although there are numerous justifications for this current state of tort law, the most common rationalizations given are twofold. First, that the primary …


Hands Off The Wheel: The Role Of Law In The Coming Extinction Of Human-Driven Cars, Tracy Hresko Pearl 2020 University of Oklahoma College of Law

Hands Off The Wheel: The Role Of Law In The Coming Extinction Of Human-Driven Cars, Tracy Hresko Pearl

Faculty Articles

Law and technology scholars have been writing about the coming release of fully autonomous vehicles for quite some time, and yet there is a significant gap in that literature. The United States has experienced a technology-driven upheaval in transportation once already, and it did so almost exactly 100 years ago when society transitioned (surprisingly rapidly) from horses to automobiles. No legal scholar has, as of yet, explored that transition at any length and asked what it can teach us about the role law and lawmaking should play in the coming transition between human-driven and fully autonomous vehicles. This is a …


Rhode Island Industrial-Recreational Building Authority V. Capco Endurance, Llc, 203 A.3d 494 (R.I. 2019), Kerri A. Schulz 2020 Candidate for Juris Doctor, Roger Williams University School of Law

Rhode Island Industrial-Recreational Building Authority V. Capco Endurance, Llc, 203 A.3d 494 (R.I. 2019), Kerri A. Schulz

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rescuing Our Democracy By Rethinking New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, David A. Logan 2020 Roger Williams University School of Law

Rescuing Our Democracy By Rethinking New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, David A. Logan

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Is Barrios The Death Knell Of Bosh Claims? The Sovereign Immunity Battle Between The Oklahoma Supreme Court And Legislature Over Constitutional Torts, Hayley Stillwell 2020 University of Oklahoma College of Law

Is Barrios The Death Knell Of Bosh Claims? The Sovereign Immunity Battle Between The Oklahoma Supreme Court And Legislature Over Constitutional Torts, Hayley Stillwell

Faculty Articles

The State of Oklahoma has explicitly adopted sovereign immunity for a broad array of tort claims, including constitutional torts—legal wrongs by government actors in violation of duties imposed by the Oklahoma Constitution. In the years before and after this explicit invocation of sovereign immunity for constitutional torts, however, the question in Oklahoma was whether the Oklahoma Legislature had the authority to do this. Even though the Oklahoma Legislature enacted a statute that invoked sovereign immunity as to certain torts, utilizing a seemingly all-encompassing definition of “tort,” the Oklahoma Supreme Court nevertheless found that private rights of action—commonly referred to as …


These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends: When Livestreaming Turns Deadly, Who Takes Responsibility?, Joseph Palumbo 2020 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends: When Livestreaming Turns Deadly, Who Takes Responsibility?, Joseph Palumbo

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Specific Consumer Expectations Test For Product Defects, W. Kip Viscusi, Clayton J. Masterman 2020 Vanderbilt University Law School

The Specific Consumer Expectations Test For Product Defects, W. Kip Viscusi, Clayton J. Masterman

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The consumer expectations test in products liability law holds firms liable for producing goods that are more dangerous than the reasonable consumer would anticipate. But judicial experience in the majority of states that have utilized the consumer expectations test demonstrates that it is ambiguous and impossible to apply predictably. The test is ill-suited for regulating complex products or markets with heterogeneous consumers; moreover, the test requires courts to expend significant resources to identify consumers' ex ante beliefs about product risks, even when consumers lacked tangible beliefs about products at the time of purchase. The other major test that courts apply …


Civil Statutes Of Limitation For Child Sexual Abuse And Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking, Emma Hetherington, Melina D. Lewis, Brian Atkinson, Brittany Blanchard, Kevin Tyler Dysart, Chase Lyndale, Devin Mashman, Charles Lawson Turner 2020 University of Georgia School of Law

Civil Statutes Of Limitation For Child Sexual Abuse And Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking, Emma Hetherington, Melina D. Lewis, Brian Atkinson, Brittany Blanchard, Kevin Tyler Dysart, Chase Lyndale, Devin Mashman, Charles Lawson Turner

Scholarly Works

The Wilbanks Child Endangerment and Sexual Exploitation (CEASE) Clinic is a teaching and research clinic at the University of Georgia School of Law. The clinic represents survivors of childhood sexual abuse and exploitation in civil and juvenile dependency proceedings. Since opening its doors in 2016, CEASE has assisted over 100 survivors in the state of Georgia through legal representation, legal advice, and/or referrals. Law and masters of social work students work in the clinic and participate in a seminar covering best practices in representing survivors, relevant laws and policies, and practical legal and social work skills. Law students represent survivors …


Judicial Adjuncts In Multidistrict Litigation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Margaret S. Williams 2020 University of Georgia School of Law

Judicial Adjuncts In Multidistrict Litigation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Margaret S. Williams

Scholarly Works

Peeking under the tent of our nation's largest and often most impactful cases reveals that judges often act like ringmasters: They delegate their authority to a wide array of magistrate judges, special masters, and settlement administrators. Some, like the American Bar Association, see this as a plus that promotes efficiency and cost savings. Critics, however, contend that delegating judicial power especially to private citizens, removes adjudication from public scrutiny, injects thorny ethical questions about ex parte communications, and risks cronyism and high costs. By constructing an original dataset of ninety-two multidistrict products liability proceedings centralized over fourteen years, we introduce …


Jesner V. Arab Bank, Plc: Limiting The Liability Of Foreign Corporations By Curbing The Breadth Of The Alien Tort Statute, Sudipta Das 2020 University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Jesner V. Arab Bank, Plc: Limiting The Liability Of Foreign Corporations By Curbing The Breadth Of The Alien Tort Statute, Sudipta Das

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.


Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, And Copyright Infringement, Zach Naqvi 2020 Marquette University Law School

Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, And Copyright Infringement, Zach Naqvi

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review

None.


Digital Commons powered by bepress