Torts Commons^™

Le Secret Professionnel, Bahige Tabbarah

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

La Sanction Et La Réparation Des Atteintes Au Corps Humain En Droit Libanais, Sélim Jahel

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

Deepfakes As Tools For Domestic Violence: Toward A Comprehensive Federal Response To Nonconsensual Deepfake Intimate Imagery, Laura Reitze

Washington and Lee Law Review Online

The rise of deepfake technology poses a novel and uniquely insidious manner of perpetrating domestic violence. Nonconsensual intimate imagery (NCII) abuse and “sextortion” are nothing new. But the increasing accessibility of deepfake technology makes it easier for abusers to carry out these forms of violence, sometimes simply with access to publicly available images of a person. As the technology rapidly evolves, the law has struggled to keep up.

This Note explores how existing law inadequately addresses emerging deepfake technology as it relates to domestic violence. Noting the origins of deepfakes in NCII, it begins with an exploration of the connection …

Clickwrap Accountability, Alicia Solow-Niederman

Fordham Law Review

Picture a public‑facing generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot on a government website that can answer questions about benefits eligibility. Systems like these expose a sociotechnical-legal divide: They route around the standard due process framework because there has been no formal government determination, yet they induce reliance from users, above and beyond past rounds of automated legal guidance. Moreover, if there is an error, current doctrine on government errors and equitable estoppel makes relief unlikely.

This Essay focuses on government deployment of public‑facing generative AI chatbots and critically assesses the front‑end power dynamics that determine who is filtered out of government …

Les Problèmes Posés Par Le Choix Et Le Cumul De La Responsabilité Contractuelle Et De La Responsabilité Délictuelle, Elie Chamoun

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

في المسؤولية السابقة للتعاقد الناشئة من قطع المحادثات, فايز الحاج شاهين

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

L’Avènement De L’Enfant Adultérin En Droit Successoral : Disparition Du Vice D’Adultérinité ?, Nada Nassar Chaoul

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

L'Informatique Juridique Appliquée À La Responsabilité Du Fait Des Choses, Roula Masri

Proche-Orient, Études juridiques

No abstract provided.

Defending The Quasi-Employee Doctrine In Singapore In The Aftermath Of Bird V Dp, Yu Han Lam, Suan Yeong Amelita Sim

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

The rule that an organisation may be held vicariously liable for a tort committed by a tortfeasor who is not its traditional employee, but whose relationship is nonetheless "akin to employment" (commonly known as the "quasi-employee doctrine"), has been accepted only in obiter dicta in Singapore. In Bird v DP, the High Court of Australia rejected the quasi-employee doctrine. Bird may therefore provide impetus for the Singapore courts to do the same. This article argues, however, that the quasi-employee doctrine should be retained for four reasons. First, it enables unincorporated associations to be appropriately held vicariously liable. Second, the Singaporecourts …

Masthead

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Getting Money Out Of Politics By Putting Money Into Politics: A Few Modest Proposals To Reform Seattle’S Democracy Voucher Program, Decker O’Donnell

Seattle University Law Review

Seattle’s Democracy Voucher Program offers an unconventional response to the growing influence of money in American elections: rather than restricting political spending, it seeks to amplify the participation of ordinary voters by providing publicly funded vouchers that residents may assign to participating candidates. This Article examines the program’s development, operation, and constitutional foundation within the modern campaign-finance framework established by Buckley v. Valeo and subsequent Supreme Court decisions. It argues that democracy vouchers provide a constitutionally viable means of broadening participation in campaign financing while mitigating the influence of wealthy donors. The Article identifies two weaknesses in the current system: …

Legal Malpractice In Washington: Use Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct, Angelo Tadrous

Seattle University Law Review

Legal malpractice claims are difficult to prove. They are difficult to prove because many jurisdictions require that a plaintiff prove that, but for the lawyer’s misconduct, the client would have fared better. Thus, in a malpractice suit, a plaintiff must try a case within a case. Despite this difficulty, many jurisdictions prohibit the use of the Rules of Professional Conduct when litigating a malpractice case. Washington State is one of these jurisdictions. The Washington Supreme Court held in Hizey v. Carpenter that the Rules of Professional Conduct may not be referred to during trial. This Note argues that this prohibition …

Converting Buildings Is Hard: Why Seattle’S Municipal Government Should Streamline Commercial-To-Residential Conversions, Tyler M. King

Seattle University Law Review

The conversion of commercial buildings into housing is a promising solution to the growing housing crisis in many urban areas. However, despite its potential benefits, the process of repurposing commercial spaces is often stymied by complex zoning codes, high conversion costs, and bureaucratic hurdles. This Article argues that the local and state governments in Seattle should adopt more streamlined policies and offer greater incentives to developers to facilitate these conversions. By reforming zoning regulations and providing targeted financial support, municipalities can reduce the barriers to conversion and unlock the potential of underutilized commercial properties. This article examines the legal and …

Who Decides The Dead? Interpreting Washington’S Disposition Of Remains Statute, Wyatt Young

Seattle University Law Review

Washington’s disposition-of-remains statute, RCW 68.50.160, is designed to honor a decedent’s expressed wishes regarding the control and disposition of their body after death. Yet recent litigation reveals a critical gap between the statute’s intent-centered design and its practical enforceability. In Larotonda v. Blackburn, a trial court acknowledged that irreparable harm would occur if a decedent’s burial wishes were ignored but nonetheless denied relief on the grounds that the individual designated to carry out those wishes lacked standing. The result was a legal paradox: a statute that recognizes decedent autonomy in theory but withholds any meaningful mechanism for its enforcement …

Postcolonial Private Law, Debadatta Bose

Brooklyn Law Review

This Article provides the missing normative foundation by linking dynamic due process and rigorous rational basis to deliberative democracy. Rigorous rational basis, in essence, requires that majorities offer what deliberative democracy calls publicly accessible reasons—those capable of engaging fellow citizens across lines of difference—for restrictions on liberties. Courts, from this perspective, legitimately referee inevitable democratic conflicts in our pluralistic society. A Court that helps restore reasoned and productive politics cannot come soon enough.

Paediatricians' Liability To Patients' Parents For Negligent Genetic Testing, Anthony Sangiuliano

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has recently held that a paediatrician might owe a duty of care to a patient’s parents when performing genetic testing on the patient and communicating test results to the parents. The parents may be able to claim damages against the paediatrician for breach of this duty if, in reliance on a miscommunication about the test results, they conceive a subsequent child who is later born with a disability. I call the tort alleged by the parents in these circumstances a subspecies of “paediatric triangular torts.” In this article, I demonstrate the conceptual feasibility of …

Civil Liability Of A Parent Company For The Unlawful Acts Of Its Subsidiary: An Analysis Of The Piercing The Corporate Veil Doctrine In Indonesian Court Decisions, Giovan Ryan Kevin Barus, Togi M.P. Pangaribuan

Lex Patrimonium

This research examines the civil liability of a parent company for unlawful acts committed by its subsidiary within a corporate group structure in Indonesia, with particular emphasis on the application of the single economic entity and piercing the corporate veil doctrines. This research adopts a doctrinal legal research method with a descriptive-analytical approach, relying on statutory analysis, legal doctrines, and case studies, namely Supreme Court Decision Number 89 PK/Pdt/2010 and Serang District Court Decision Number 30/Pdt.G/2022/PN Srg. The findings demonstrate that although the principles of separate legal personality and limited liability remain fundamental under Indonesian company law, courts may, in …

Standar Ganti Rugi Materil Dalam Kasus Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pada Hewan Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Kasus Blackout Pln Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 09/Pdt.G.S/2019/Pn Jkt Slt, Nathania Debora Siagian, Rosa Agustina

Lex Patrimonium

This study examines the standard of material compensation for pet deaths due to unlawful acts in Indonesian law, using a case study of District Court Decision No. 09/PDT.G.S/2019/PN JKT Sel, which rejected a claim for the death of four koi fish due to a power outage by PLN. Through doctrinal legal research with case and comparative law approaches, this study finds that Indonesian law still categorizes animals as movable objects, limiting compensation to provable economic loss, without considering emotional value. The court ruled that the power outage was not an unlawful act due to lack of fault, thus limiting PLN’s …

Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penanggung Akibat Pembatalan Sepihak Perjanjian Asuransi Jiwa: Studi Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan, Chelsea Putri Kezia Aruan, Togi Marolop Pradana Pangaribuan

Lex Patrimonium

Life insurance contracts are reciprocal agreements based on the principle of utmost good faith, binding insurers and insured parties to perform their contractual obligations. In practice, insurers often unilaterally cancel life insurance policies, particularly at the claim stage, causing legal uncertainty and financial loss to policyholders or beneficiaries. This study aims to examine whether unilateral cancellation of life insurance contracts by insurers constitutes an unlawful act under Indonesian civil law and to analyze judicial considerations in resolving such disputes. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and …