Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy, Gerald F. Davis
Seattle University Law Review
Our understanding of the American economy often relies on stylized facts derived from mandatory disclosures by listed corporations. Data vendors like Standard & Poor’s vacuum up 10Ks and proxy statements into databases, and scholars distill these into tentative maps. This may have been adequate for a postwar economy centered on asset-heavy manufacturers, but it is increasingly out of step with an information-based economy. Companies listed on the stock market are fewer in number and less representative than they were, light in tangible assets and people, and heavy on IP. Basic facts such as what industry they are in are increasingly …
Federal Legislation And College Sports: Which Way Forward?,
2025
Fordham Law School
Federal Legislation And College Sports: Which Way Forward?, Alfred Yen, Dionne Koller
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Boden Lecture: Taxation Of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence,
2025
Marquette University Law School
Boden Lecture: Taxation Of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence, Reuven Avi-Yonah, Lucas Brasil Salama, Herbert Snitz, W. Robert Thomas
Marquette Law Review
This Article proposes that tax can be a useful supplement to other measures to regulate Autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AAI) and limit its potential harmful effects. This proposal differs from command-and-control regulation of AAI along the lines of European Union legislation that may unduly limit the development of AAI. It also differs from existing proposals to tax AAI to generate revenue to help workers displaced by AAI programs, or to tax the data used by AAI. The proposal is based on granting AAI programs like ChatGPT separate legal personhood, like corporate personhood, while incentivizing or requiring their corporate owner to place …
Table Of Contents,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Seattle University Law Review
As corporations are increasingly pressed to reveal information about their exposure to climate-related risks, they are often asked to undertake and disclose the outcome of “scenario analysis.” In this exercise, corporations, including financial institutions, examine how their business would fare under different pathways the future may take. One oft-used scenario, for example, is the International Energy Agency’s “Net-Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Energy Sector.” This Essay presents a history of the use of scenarios as a corporate planning tool, particularly in the oil industry, arguing that it is key for understanding our present moment and the role of …
Shareholder Expression In A Time Of Heightened Political Tension,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Shareholder Expression In A Time Of Heightened Political Tension, Aaron A. Dhir
Seattle University Law Review
In this article, I provide context for my forthcoming research project on shareholder proposals and racial equity audits. Since the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, progressive shareholder actors have increasingly used the proposal mechanism to advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice-related goals. These proposals have frequently gone beyond requesting the usual corporate fare of diversity trainings, intersectionality workshops, affinity groups, etc. Instead, a more ambitious type of proposal asks corporate America to conduct racial equity audits, defined as “an independent, objective and holistic analysis of a company’s policies, practices, products, services and efforts to combat systemic racism …
Corporate Governance Speech,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan
Seattle University Law Review
The State has always regulated the intra-firm communications that make corporate governance possible, most commonly by mandating disclosures of information by a corporation to its shareholders. Some such laws are labeled “securities regulation,” but securities regulation is a broad category that extends to speech by actors who are outside the corporate enterprise as well. Also, the conventional securities regulation category does not capture all such laws; other examples, including informationforcing mandates, can be found in state corporate law. This Article uses the term “corporate governance speech” to describe the communications among shareholders, directors, and officers through which corporate governance is …
Dark Accounting Matter,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Seattle University Law Review
Physicists calculate that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is composed of “dark matter” that “does not absorb, reflect, or emit electromagnetic radiation and is therefore difficult to detect.” The S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-book value of 4.2, suggesting that book value accounts for less than 20% of the S&P 500’s market value. The remaining 80% appears nowhere in these firms’ balance sheets—it is invisible to contemporary accounting techniques and constitutes “dark accounting matter.”
Some “dark accounting matter” is composed of factors commonly described as components of “ESG.” Human capital, for example, is an intangible asset …
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
Seattle University Law Review
The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.
Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
Seattle University Law Review
A variety of businesses now cite 303 Creative when seeking First Amendment protection for their refusal to serve certain customers based on those customers’ protected class status. How this litigation will play out remains to be seen. But future courts need not, and should not, repeat the 303 Creative Court’s misunderstanding of how the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions actually works.
Part I of this Essay explains the Court’s longstanding understanding of the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions, and then describes the Court’s failure to engage with this precedent in 303 Creative. Part II then identifies the 303 Creative decision’s …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones
Seattle University Law Review
For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.
This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Green Dividends: A Case Study In Green Dividends And The Conditions For Private Ordering Solutions,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Green Dividends: A Case Study In Green Dividends And The Conditions For Private Ordering Solutions, Anne M. Tucker
Seattle University Law Review
This Essay introduces a novel private ordering solution to facilitate corporate investments in pro-social and environmental initiatives: Green dividends. Green dividends are an optional increase in shareholder dividends that are returned to the company to be reinvested in environmental initiatives or kept by a shareholder.
Green dividends pose an alternative to the current gridlocked debate that corporations can’t, won’t, shouldn’t, and shouldn’t even try to act in pro-social or environmental ways. Turning the common refrains on their head converts each narrative into an element for a successful private ordering solution: authority, accountability, shareholder buy-in, and government- backed enforcement. With Green …
Does Climate Disclosure Work To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Emerging Evidence Suggests Cautious Optimism,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Does Climate Disclosure Work To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Emerging Evidence Suggests Cautious Optimism, Cynthia A. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Significant regulatory resources have been spent developing global, voluntary climate and sustainability disclosure standards, such as the TCFD, TNRD, and ISSB’s Sustainability and Climate Disclosure standards, or domestically required disclosures, such as in the EU and in the U.S. Thus, it is important to evaluate whether this disclosure, particularly voluntary, qualitative disclosure, will have the power to shift the allocation of capital, will have a significant effect on the management of climate risk within firms, and ultimately will reduce climate change risk and biodiversity loss.
In this Article, several interrelated questions will be discussed. First, what does the empirical evidence …
In (Tax) Hindsight: When Should The Tax System Ease Taxpayer Regrets?,
2025
University of Florida Levin College of Law
In (Tax) Hindsight: When Should The Tax System Ease Taxpayer Regrets?, Charlene Luke
UF Law Faculty Publications
A brief review of, Emily Cauble, Taxpayers’ Tax Election Regrets, 77 The Tax Law. 77 (2023), that focuses on § 754 elections.
Taxing People, Not Residents,
2025
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Taxing People, Not Residents, Yariv Brauner
UF Law Faculty Publications
Essentially all states tax their residents’ worldwide income. This norm is difficult to justify beyond vague notions of state provided benefits enjoyed by residents. Recent increased mobility (particularly tax-motivated mobility of wealthy individuals) and the growing importance of remote work and digital nomadism present a serious challenge to this linking of residence and taxing rights. This article examines whether exclusive source taxation of individuals could replace the existing rules which are based on a compromise between residence and source taxation. The article concludes that exclusive source taxation of individuals is both feasible and desirable, mainly due to its fairness and …
The Service’S Overgenerous Tax Treatment Of Crowdfunding,
2025
Florida State University College of Law
The Service’S Overgenerous Tax Treatment Of Crowdfunding, Jeffrey H. Kahn
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
The Internal Revenue Service released a fact sheet that defines crowdfunding as a method to raise money on websites by soliciting contributions from a large number of people. This article considers how crowdfunding is treated for tax purposes and argues that, contrary to the fact sheet's determination, all donations collected by commercial websites should be income to the recipient.
