United States V. Windsor: The Marital Deduction That Changed Marriage,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
United States V. Windsor: The Marital Deduction That Changed Marriage, Lee-Ford Tritt
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Front Matter,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
The U.S. Supreme Court And The Law Of Trusts And Estates: A Law Reformer's Perspective,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
The U.S. Supreme Court And The Law Of Trusts And Estates: A Law Reformer's Perspective, Thomas P. Gallanis
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Helvering V. Horst: Gifts Of Income From Property,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Helvering V. Horst: Gifts Of Income From Property, Jerome M. Hesch, David J. Herzig
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Shaughnessy: Slippery Remainder Interests And The Intersection Of Gift And Estate Taxes,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Smith V. Shaughnessy: Slippery Remainder Interests And The Intersection Of Gift And Estate Taxes, Ann-Marie Rhodes, Erica E. Lord
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commissioner V. Estate Of Noel: The Double Life Of Life Insurance,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Commissioner V. Estate Of Noel: The Double Life Of Life Insurance, John Mcgown Jr., Jason Melville
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
United States V. Estate Of Grace: Seeking A More Objective Test For The Application Of The Reciprocal Trust Doctrine,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
United States V. Estate Of Grace: Seeking A More Objective Test For The Application Of The Reciprocal Trust Doctrine, Dennis I. Belcher, Kristen Frances Hager
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commissioner V. Estate Of Hubert: How The I.R.S. Stole Hubert's Blessing,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Commissioner V. Estate Of Hubert: How The I.R.S. Stole Hubert's Blessing, Kristen E. Caverly
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Four Horsemen And Estate Taxation,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
The Four Horsemen And Estate Taxation, Jasper L. Cummings Jr.
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Helvering V. Clifford: The Supreme Court Spoils The Broth,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Helvering V. Clifford: The Supreme Court Spoils The Broth, Mark L. Ascher
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Oklahoma Tax Commission V. United States: Death Taxes On Restricted Indian Personalty,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Oklahoma Tax Commission V. United States: Death Taxes On Restricted Indian Personalty, Thomas E. Simmons
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Foreword -- The Supreme Court's Estate Planning Jurisprudence,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Foreword -- The Supreme Court's Estate Planning Jurisprudence, Bridget J. Crawford
ACTEC Law Journal
This short essay introduces a special issue of the ACTEC Law Journal devoted to the estate planning jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. The issue includes two invited essays on the role of the court in developing the law in this area, as well as commentaries on seventeen of the most important estate planning-related cases decided by the Supreme Court between 1925 and 2013.
Irwin V. Gavit: Income Is (Sometimes) In The Eye Of The Beholder,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Irwin V. Gavit: Income Is (Sometimes) In The Eye Of The Beholder, William P. Lapiana
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taft V. Bowers: The Foundation For Non-Recognition Provisions In The Income Tax,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Taft V. Bowers: The Foundation For Non-Recognition Provisions In The Income Tax, James R. Repetti
ACTEC Law Journal
Taft v. Bowers is a Supreme Court decision that is rarely studied in law schools or discussed by scholars. Yet, it is a case of vast significance. In the Taft decision, the Supreme Court confirmed that Congress may create non-recognition exceptions to the income tax that merely defer the recognition of income, rather than permanently exclude it. If the Taft case had been decided differently, it is likely that the number of non-recognition provisions in the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") would be significantly reduced.
Robinette V. Helvering: Valuation Of Gifts To Split-Interest Trusts,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Robinette V. Helvering: Valuation Of Gifts To Split-Interest Trusts, Stephanie E. Heilborn, Cindy Zhou
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Dickman V. Commissioner: Loans As Property Transfers,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Dickman V. Commissioner: Loans As Property Transfers, Carlyn S. Mccaffrey, John C. Mccaffrey
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. V. Smith: Form Over Substance?,
2016
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. V. Smith: Form Over Substance?, Deborah V. Dunn, Domingo P. Such Iii
ACTEC Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Professor Elaine Gagliardi On The Magical Power Of Appointment: Allows Trustor To Achieve Targeted Tax Consequences And Flexibility Of Control,
2016
Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
Professor Elaine Gagliardi On The Magical Power Of Appointment: Allows Trustor To Achieve Targeted Tax Consequences And Flexibility Of Control, Elaine H. Gagliardi
Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings
As children, and sometimes as adults, we wish for magical powers to order the world in the way we want. Estate planners can make that wish come true for some clients and beneficiaries with judicious use of powers of appointment. Powers of appointment are uniquely suited to achieving targeted planning goals and increasing trust flexibility. Planning techniques, old and new, including the oft used Crummey trust1 and the more recently developed array of acronym trusts designed to achieve specific tax consequences, such as the intentionally defective grantor trust (IDGT)2 and the Delaware incomplete non-grantor trust (DING)3 to name a few, …
The Contemporary Tax Journal Volume 5, No. 2 – Winter 2016,
2016
San Jose State University
The Contemporary Tax Journal Volume 5, No. 2 – Winter 2016
The Contemporary Tax Journal
No abstract provided.
Analysis Of The Federal Estate Tax,
2016
San Jose State University
Analysis Of The Federal Estate Tax, Rachita Kothari
The Contemporary Tax Journal
No abstract provided.
