Tax Law Commons^™

Testamentary Freedom: A Constitutional Perspective, Richard J. Goralewicz

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Civilization Depends On Us: The Virtues Of Estate Planning And Estate Planners, Turney P. Berry

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Limitations On The Enforcement Of Foreign Forced Heirship Laws, Raquel Begleiter, Austin Bramwell, Molly Schiff

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Limits On State Power To Tax Trust Income, Carlyn S. Mccaffrey, John C. Mccaffrey

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Why Do We Ask The Court To Do Something That It Can't? Constitutional And Practical Issues With Judicial Appointment Of Successor Trustees, R. Ethan Ward, Stephen C. Crofford

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Issues In The Trusts And Estates Field

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Anna Nicole's Constitutional Estates Law Legacy, Dave Fagundes

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

After Sveen V. Melin, Is There A Contracts Clause Argument Against Laws Retroactively Terminating Child Support Obligations After The Death Of The Obligor Parent?, Diane Kemker

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Once More: Digital Services Taxes Should Be Creditable, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In a previous column, I argued that digital services taxes should be creditable as in-lieu-of taxes under section 903. A new analysis by Jane Gravelle sheds further light on this topic but does not change the outcome.

Gravelle makes three arguments against the creditability of DSTs. First, she argues that the whole concept underlying both pillar 1 and DSTs (allocating value to market jurisdictions) is wrong, and therefore they cannot be justified. Second, she argues that DSTs are passed on in full to consumers and that this precludes creditability. Finally, she argues that DSTs are discriminatory excise taxes on U.S. …

The Usefulness Of Pillar 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Many commentators have declared that pillar 1 of the base erosion and profit-shifting project 2.0 is dead. By its explicit terms, the multilateral tax convention (MLC) implementing pillar 1 cannot go into effect this year without ratification by the United States, and the chances of the United States ratifying it before or after the election are low given massive opposition in Congress. If the MLC does not go into effect by December 31, 2024, over 30 countries will likely impose digital services taxes on January 1, 2025, making the whole pillar 1 project (which was aimed at preventing the spread …

University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review, University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Limitation On Benefits Or Principal Purpose Test? Part 2, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Part 1 of this column discussed the choice between the limitation on benefits and principal purpose test (PPT) and the history of the LOB in U.S. tax treaty policy.

How effective is the LOB article in U.S. tax treaties, now that it no longer includes the PPT from the original U.S. LOB?

Limitation On Benefits Or Principal Purpose Test? Part 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

An interesting recent column by Tax Notes’ Lee Sheppard criticizes the principal purpose test (PPT) that was adopted as a minimum standard in the OECD’s base erosion and profit-shifting project 1.0 and has since been incorporated into many tax treaties through the multilateral instrument. Sheppard explains:

Readers will recall that BEPS 1.0 had a set of minimum standards for participating countries, one of which was a treaty amendment to cement the purpose of the treaty to prevent both double taxation and double nontaxation. Participants could choose between a seemingly simple, subjective principal purpose test (PPT) and a complicated but objective …

Crypto Losses, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine

Articles

The crypto industry has been hit hard with various market forces and scams, leaving investors with trillion-dollar losses in recent years. The appropriate tax treatment of such losses has yet to be fully examined, as there is scant guidance and a dearth of academic literature on the subject. This Article attempts to fill this gap by applying general tax principles to crypto losses and making several recommendations to improve the clarity and consistency of tax results. It explores various theories of crypto loss “realization” (including theft, abandonment, and worthlessness), highlighting where additional guidance is needed. And it considers appropriate legislative …

Has Cost Sharing Outlived Its Usefulness?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In her thoughtful column on cost sharing, Mindy Herzfeld explains the history of costsharing arrangements (CSAs) going all the way back to 1966, and then asks several questions, including: “Should the existing CSA regs be scrapped in favor of another regime, or simply eliminated as a choice for taxpayers?”

Pillar 2 And Specific Benefits For Multinationals, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In a recent column, Tax Notes’ Martin Sullivan asked whether a country that wishes to neutralize the effect of pillar 2 on its investment incentives can get around the OECD prohibition on a multinational enterprise receiving what amounts to a refund of the pillar 2 tax it pays to that country. He writes that:

It would make a mockery of the pillar 2 taxation system if an investment hub imposed a 15 percent minimum tax on a company — thereby shielding profit in that hub from other jurisdictions’ pillar 2 tax — and then, through a separate mechanism, unconditionally returned …

Preventing Inversions, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Inversions (transactions in which a U.S. parent corporation becomes a subsidiary of a foreign corporation, but the headquarters remain in the United States) were a major focus of tax policy before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.1 There have been no inversions since the TCJA, but that is more a result of the current rate structure. If the corporate tax rate is increased, inversions may come back, and the time to act to prevent that is now.

The Court Of Justice Kicks Around The Dichotomy Between Data Protection And Competition Law Case Comment Of The Preliminary Ruling In Case C-252/21 Meta Platforms V. Bundeskartellamt, Alba Ribera Martínez

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

Data protection and competition law have been at a crossroads in terms of their integration. Antitrust authorities as well as data protection supervisory authorities have grappled with the question of whether both fields of law should be combined into the same analysis. The German competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt, was the first to fuse them in its landmark case against Facebook’s data processing terms and conditions. The exploitative theory of harm put forward by the German NCA is the first of its kind to integrate data protection considerations into the antitrust analysis, namely by drawing a line between an infringement with …

Should Large Corporate Mergers Be Subsidized?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

On March 21 Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, DR. I., and J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, introduced the Stop Subsidizing Giant Mergers Act. They explained that large mergers have been increasing in recent years and that since 2007, up to 40 percent by value of all mergers have been structured as tax free. They argue that the tax breaks to mergers are a “wasteful subsidy.”