Protect Me From Myself: Determining Competency To Waive The Right To Counsel During Civil-Commitment Proceedings In Washington State,
2011
Seattle University School of Law
Protect Me From Myself: Determining Competency To Waive The Right To Counsel During Civil-Commitment Proceedings In Washington State, Jacob J. Stender
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment argues that an unarticulated, heightened standard of competency to waive counsel, under which Washington currently operates, is the ideal standard to address the unique concerns that exist in civil- commitment proceedings. This Comment clarifies the existing law governing the determination of a party’s right to waive counsel, as well as the determination of the validity of such a waiver. This Comment also articulates a comprehensive inquiry standard for trial courts, both within and outside of Washington, to apply when determining the competency of a party and the validity of a waiver. The goal of this express determination standard …
Dead Wrong: Why Washington’S Deadly Weapon Criminal Sentencing Enhancement Needs “Enhancement”,
2011
Seattle University School of Law
Dead Wrong: Why Washington’S Deadly Weapon Criminal Sentencing Enhancement Needs “Enhancement”, James Harlan Corning
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment confronts the difficult question of how to reformulate the deadly weapon sentencing enhancement to better align it with the policy goals of deterring and punishing armed crime. Part II explores the constitutional and practical defects in each of the three formulations of the sentencing enhancement’s armed requirement by delving into the enhancement’s legislative history and the judicial struggle to interpret it. Part III analyzes the need for a more nuanced approach to the weapon enhancement by exploring key criticisms about the enhancement’s scope and application. Part IV argues that the Washington legislature must provide courts with more rigid …
Domestic Violence And The Budget Crisis: The Use Of A Risk Assessment Tool To Manage Cases In Prosecutors’ Offices,
2011
Seattle University School of Law
Domestic Violence And The Budget Crisis: The Use Of A Risk Assessment Tool To Manage Cases In Prosecutors’ Offices, Carrie M. Hobbs
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment addresses the growing concern that the incompatible forces of shrinking budgets and increased caseloads are leading to ineffective domestic violence case management, particularly in prosecutors’ offices. With so many cases and so few resources, prosecutors need tools to discern which cases should have priority. Recognizing that risk assessment tools have many drawbacks, this Comment advocates for development of a risk assessment tool that can help prosecutors determine which cases to pursue and assist them in making other pretrial determinations. Part II of this Comment provides a background on domestic violence research and isolates the issues that arise in …
Appeal No. 0829: Edythe Dimarco V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gonzoil, Inc.,
2011
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Appeal No. 0829: Edythe Dimarco V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gonzoil, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2010-43 (GonzOil Inc., Lazlo Well #1D)
Adverse Possession, Private-Zoning Waiver & Desuetude: Abandonment & Recapture Of Property And Liberty Interests,
2011
John Marshall Law School
Adverse Possession, Private-Zoning Waiver & Desuetude: Abandonment & Recapture Of Property And Liberty Interests, Scott Andrew Shepard
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Adverse-possession doctrine labors under a pair of disabilities: a hesitancy by theorists to embrace the abandonment-and-recapture principle that informs the doctrine, and a substantial unwillingness of governments to abandon an antiquated and outmoded maxim shielding them from the doctrine's important work. Removing these disabilities will allow a series of positive outcomes. First, it will demonstrate that all would-be adverse possessors, not just those acting "in good faith" or with possessory intent, should enjoy the fruits of the doctrine. Second, it will provide valuable additional means by which the public may monitor the performance of government employees, and additional discipline to …
To Incorporate Or Not To Incorporate - That Is The Question: How State V. Custard Clarified Corporate Governance In North Carolina,
2011
North Carolina Central University School of Law
To Incorporate Or Not To Incorporate - That Is The Question: How State V. Custard Clarified Corporate Governance In North Carolina, Lauren J. Allen
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Asian Carp, Chicago Canal Litigation, And The Great Lakes And Mississippi River Inter‐Basin Study,
2011
Great Lakes Environmental Law Center
Asian Carp, Chicago Canal Litigation, And The Great Lakes And Mississippi River Inter‐Basin Study, Katherine Storch, Nick Schroeck
Law Faculty Research Publications
Over the past century the Mississippi River and Great Lakes basins have been devastated economically and ecologically by the establishment of aquatic invasive species. In the Mississippi River basin, the most extensive damage has been attributed to the presence of large populations of Asian carp. These invasive species have developed large, self‐sustaining populations because of their ability to outcompete native fish for food and habitat, which in turn impacts the balance of the ecosystem. The term “Asian carp” collectively refers to multiple species, but for our purposes Big Head and Silver carps are of the greatest immediate concern because they …
Balancing Transparency, Privacy, Technology, And Efficiency: Implementing Broome County's Freedom Of Information Law In The 21st Century,
2011
Drew University
Balancing Transparency, Privacy, Technology, And Efficiency: Implementing Broome County's Freedom Of Information Law In The 21st Century, Jennifer K. Royer
MPA Capstone Projects 2006 - 2015
All State and municipal governments are required by the New York State Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) to release government documents to the public and the media when requested. Broome County has an active FOIL program which must adapt to continuing changes in technology. Several policy and public management options could help the county better utilize electronic methods while balancing competing pressures, making its FOIL program one of the most efficient and cost effective programs in the state.
This paper reviews literature regarding the competing pressures of: transparency in a democratic society, the legal guidelines governing the release or protection …
Preemption & The Regulatory Paradigm In The Roberts Court,
2011
University of Missouri School of Law
Preemption & The Regulatory Paradigm In The Roberts Court, Christina E. Wells, William E. Marcantel, Dave Winters
Faculty Publications
This short article first examines the Court's general preemption doctrine, including relevant criticisms. It then details the rise of the regulatory paradigm in the Supreme Court's cases, especially as it culminates in the Roberts Court's reliance on it. Finally, it examines potential implications of increasing reliance on that paradigm, including manipulation of preemption doctrine by judges, continued deference to agency officials' decisions to preempt, and adverse effects on individual tort plaintiffs.
The Positive Case For Centralization In Health Care Regulation: The Federalism Failures Of The Aca,
2011
Cleveland State University College of Law
The Positive Case For Centralization In Health Care Regulation: The Federalism Failures Of The Aca, Abigail R. Moncrieff, Eric Lee
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Although the ACA accomplishes significantly greater centralization of authority for healthcare regulation, it falls far short of the full centralization that seems functionally justified. There is no doubt that the states have played an important role in healthcare regulation throughout the nation's history, but that role is becoming increasingly irrelevant as healthcare regulation becomes increasingly technocratic—i.e., increasingly objectivist and data-driven. The ACA is a step in the right direction, but the U.S. should further centralize authority over healthcare.
Dice Or No Dice: The Casino Debate In Massachusetts,
2011
University of Massachusetts Boston
Dice Or No Dice: The Casino Debate In Massachusetts, College Of Management, University Of Massachusetts Boston
Financial Services Forum Publications
The debate on casinos has intensified over the last few years. Governor Deval Patrick tried to get approval for three casinos back in September 2008, which was rejected by the then Speaker Salvatore Dimasi. However, two years ago, the Governor stood in the way of casinos by vetoing the bill passed by the House and the Senate.
With the economy still recovering from the aftermath of the “Great Recession”, there are talks about job creation and consumer spending all over Massachusetts. Currently, the three most critical players in the government of Massachusetts - Governor Deval Patrick, House Speaker Robert DeLeo, …
Just A Little Bit Of History Repeating: The
California Model Of Marijuana
Legalization And How It Might Affect Racial
And Ethnic Minorities,
2011
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Just A Little Bit Of History Repeating: The California Model Of Marijuana Legalization And How It Might Affect Racial And Ethnic Minorities, Thomas J. Moran
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Assessing The State Of State Constitutionalism,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
Assessing The State Of State Constitutionalism, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
State constitutions are terribly important legal documents, but their interpretation is remarkably understudied (and, of course, highly undertheorized) in the academic literature. This review essay discusses Robert Williams’s welcome new book, The Law of American State Constitutions (Oxford University Press, 2009). After summarizing the content of Williams’s book, it discusses the normative significance of his work, focusing especially on his discussion of independent state constitutions and the positive theory of interpretation he advances. The essay concludes by highlighting some areas where the field of state constitutional law is in need of further advancement, including research that positions state constitutions within …
The Analyses Of State And Federal Medical Marijuana Laws And How They Apply To Employment,
2011
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
The Analyses Of State And Federal Medical Marijuana Laws And How They Apply To Employment, Lizaveta Sergeev
UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones
The purpose of this study is to analyze and discuss the current discrepancies in the legal system as it applies to medical marijuana in the employment sector. The laws regarding the legalization of medical marijuana are relatively new and have many constraints when applied to employment. On the federal level, medical marijuana remains illegal. Many states have passed some form of legislation legalizing medical marijuana. Unfortunately, only two states have laws that protect users from being discriminated in employment. This leaves employers and employees uncertain about what actions to take when dealing with medical marijuana in the employment sector.
Assessing The State Of The State Constitutionalism,
2011
Florida State University College of Law
Assessing The State Of The State Constitutionalism, Jim Rossi
Michigan Law Review
Robert Williams's The Law of American State Constitutions is an impressive career accomplishment for one of the leading academic lawyers writing on state constitutions. Given the need for a comprehensive, treatise-like treatment of state constitutions that transcends individual jurisdictions, Williams's book will almost certainly become the go-to treatise for the next generation of state constitutional law practitioners and scholars. The U.S. Constitution has a grip on how the American legal mind approaches issues in American constitutionalism, but an important recurring theme in Williams's work (as well as that of others) is how state constitutions present unique interpretive challenges. More than …
Cooperation, Commandeering, Or Crowding Out?: Federal Intervention And State Choices In Health Care Policy,
2011
William & Mary Law School
Cooperation, Commandeering, Or Crowding Out?: Federal Intervention And State Choices In Health Care Policy, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This Article's analysis proceeds in three parts. Part II of this article outlines the policy considerations in determining the proper federal and state balance in health care policy. There are strong arguments for state primacy in health care policy, but also substantial justifications for federal intervention. Part III discusses the concept of "cooperative federalism," under which the federal government encourages state governments to implement policies in accord with federal priorities, and identifies constitutional limitations on the federal government's ability to direct or even influence state policy choices. Even if the constitutional challenges to the individual mandate fails, federalism-based challenges to …
Courthouses Vs. Statehouses?,
2011
Stanford Law School
Courthouses Vs. Statehouses?, William S. Koski
Michigan Law Review
Just over twenty years ago, the Kentucky Supreme Court declared the commonwealth's primary and secondary public-education finance system-indeed, the entire system of primary and secondary public education in Kentucky-unconstitutional under the "common schools" clause of the education article in Kentucky's constitution. That case has been widely cited as having ushered in the "adequacy" movement in school-finance litigation and reform, in which those challenging state school-funding schemes argue that the state has failed to ensure that students are provided an adequate education guaranteed by their state constitutions. Since the Rose decision in Kentucky, some thirty-three school-finance lawsuits have reached final decisions …
Same Sex Marriage: Does The Constitution Or State Constitution Support Same-Sex Marriages?,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
Same Sex Marriage: Does The Constitution Or State Constitution Support Same-Sex Marriages?, Sonja Seehusen
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Discussion On The District Of Columbia's Procurement Law And The Spark That Led To Renewed Reform Efforts,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
A Discussion On The District Of Columbia's Procurement Law And The Spark That Led To Renewed Reform Efforts, Megan S. Vahey
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
This note explores the premise that the Council contract review process applies to all non-exempt agency contracts which meet the $1 million or multiyear thresholds. The first section explores the history of procurement law in the District of Columbia. The second section discusses procurement reform efforts. The third section provides an overview of the parks and recreation contracts controversy. Finally, the fourth section analyzes the procurement authority of exempt and non-exempt District agencies with respect to the legislative powers granted to the Council of the District of Columbia.
The District Of Columbia V. The 50 States: A 21st Century Lawsuit To Remedy An 18th Century Injustice,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
The District Of Columbia V. The 50 States: A 21st Century Lawsuit To Remedy An 18th Century Injustice, Timothy Cooper
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
