Confounding Identities: The Paradox Of Lgbt Children Under Asylum Law,
2011
Brooklyn Law School
Confounding Identities: The Paradox Of Lgbt Children Under Asylum Law, Susan Hazeldean
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Moral Mandate Or Personal Preference? Possible Avenues For Accommodation Of Civil Servants Morally Opposed To Facilitating Same-Sex Marriage,
2011
Brigham Young University Law School
Moral Mandate Or Personal Preference? Possible Avenues For Accommodation Of Civil Servants Morally Opposed To Facilitating Same-Sex Marriage, Matthew Chandler
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sex, Privacy And Public Health In A Casual Encounters Culture,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
Sex, Privacy And Public Health In A Casual Encounters Culture, Mary D. Fan
Articles
The regulation of sex and disease is a cultural and political flashpoint and recurring challenge that law's antiquated arsenal has been hard- pressed to effectively address. Compelling data demonstrate the need for attention—for example, one in four women aged fourteen to nineteen is infected with at least one sexually transmitted disease ("STD"); managing STDs costs an estimated $15.9 billion annually; and syphilis, once near eradication, is on the rise again, as are the rates of HIV diagnosis among people aged fifteen to twenty-four. Public health officials on the front lines have called for paradigm changes to tackle the enormous challenge. …
Winning The Battle Or Losing The War: The Implications Of Boseman V. Jarrell On The Same-Sex Adoption Debate In North Carolina,
2011
North Carolina Central University School of Law
Winning The Battle Or Losing The War: The Implications Of Boseman V. Jarrell On The Same-Sex Adoption Debate In North Carolina, Jacinta Jones
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
From 'Barbarity' To Regularity: A Case Study Of 'Unnecesarean' Malpractice Claims,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
From 'Barbarity' To Regularity: A Case Study Of 'Unnecesarean' Malpractice Claims, Jamie Abrams
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This paper is a case study from “barbarity” to “regularity” examining comparatively the first ever “unnecesarean” lawsuit arising out of an 1858 cesarean section malpractice case next to a modern forced cesarean section malpractice suit. It positions the modern “unnecessarean” epidemic, in which 30% of births today are by cesarean section, in a historical medical malpractice context. This case study primarily examines a controversial 1858 lawsuit arising out of the first documented cesarean section performed by the revered Dr. Elias Cooper in California. The surgery left Mary Hodges’s bladder, womb, and intestines permanently fused together and left her permanently disfigured. …
Student Victims Or Student Criminals? The Bookends Of Sexting In A Cyber World,
2011
University of New Hampshire
Student Victims Or Student Criminals? The Bookends Of Sexting In A Cyber World, Todd A. Demitchell, Martha Parker-Magagna
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that criminalizing sexting as child pornography unfairly victimizes adolescents, contradicting the purpose of laws intended to protect minors. It advocates for a balanced approach that addresses the harm caused by sexting without imposing felony charges, which can have lifelong consequences. The analysis emphasizes that zero-tolerance policies and strict legal responses are ineffective and unjust, as they fail to consider the context of adolescent behavior and the unintended consequences of criminalization.
Between Victim And Agent: A Third-Way Feminist Account Of Trafficking For Sex Work,
2011
University of Toledo College of Law
Between Victim And Agent: A Third-Way Feminist Account Of Trafficking For Sex Work, Shelley Cavalieri
Indiana Law Journal
Feminist legal theorists have devoted enormous attention to conceptualizing the issues of sex work and trafficking for sexual purposes. While these theories vary, they typically fall into one of two camps. The abolitionist perspective, having grown out of dominance feminist theory, perceives sex work as inherently exploitative. In contrast, a second group of theorists adopts a liberal notion of individual choice and draws on the poststructuralist rejection of gender essentialism to envision a theoretical model of sex-worker rights. The legal and public policies that grow from these two models are similarly polarized. Radical feminist abolitionists are often strange bedfellows with …
Mandatory Hpv Vaccination And Political Debate,
2011
Georgetown University Law Center
Mandatory Hpv Vaccination And Political Debate, Lawrence O. Gostin
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Vaccinations are among the most cost-effective and widely used public health interventions, but have provoked popular resistance, with compulsion framed as an unwarranted state interference. When the FDA approved a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2006, conservative religious groups strongly opposed a mandate, arguing it would condone pre-marital sex, undermine parental rights, and violate bodily integrity. Yet, Governor Rick Perry signed an executive order in 2007 making Texas the first state to enact a mandate — later revoked by the legislature.
Mandatory HPV vaccination reached the heights of presidential politics in a recent Republican debate. Calling the vaccine a "very …
A Tale Of Two Cases: Baehr V. Miike, Perry V. Schwarzenegger, And The Future Of Same-Sex Marriage Litigation,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
A Tale Of Two Cases: Baehr V. Miike, Perry V. Schwarzenegger, And The Future Of Same-Sex Marriage Litigation, Samuel Yaggy
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the strategic approaches used in same-sex marriage litigation, contrasting the methods employed in Perry v. Schwarzenegger with those in Baehr v. Miike. It argues that Perry's focus on challenging the factual underpinnings of government rationales for same-sex marriage restrictions provides a stronger legal foundation compared to Baehr's emphasis on the relationship between statutes and their purposes. By grounding its case in extensive factual analysis, Perry sets a strategic precedent for future litigation, making it more difficult for appellate courts to overturn the ruling.
Restoring Restitution: The Role Of Proximate Causation In Child Pornography Possession Cases Where Restitution Is Sought,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Restoring Restitution: The Role Of Proximate Causation In Child Pornography Possession Cases Where Restitution Is Sought, Dennis F. Dibari
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Death To Gays!" Uganda's 'One Step Forward, One Step Back' Approach To Human Rights,
2011
University at Buffalo School of Law
"Death To Gays!" Uganda's 'One Step Forward, One Step Back' Approach To Human Rights, Tiffany M. Lebrón
Buffalo Human Rights Law Review
No abstract provided.
Band-Aid Solutions: New York’S Piecemeal Attempt To Address Legal Issues Created By Doma In Conjunction With Advances In Surrogacy,
2011
Pace University School of Law
Band-Aid Solutions: New York’S Piecemeal Attempt To Address Legal Issues Created By Doma In Conjunction With Advances In Surrogacy, James Healy
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Holding Schools Accountable For Their Sex-Ed Curricula,
2011
Liberty University
Holding Schools Accountable For Their Sex-Ed Curricula, Rena M. Lindevaldsen
Faculty Publications and Presentations
This article examines the legal and policy implications that arise when a school district decides to instruct students on issues concerning same-sex attractions. As more states afford legal recognition to same-sex relationships and adopt non-discrimination codes that include sexual orientation, schools are faced with the decision of what, when, and how to teach children about same-sex attractions. Providing instruction on this divisive issue is fraught with conflict as views and beliefs on the topic are deeply-held, diverse, and often politically charged. In disputes concerning other sensitive topics, courts long have afforded schools broad discretion to implement curriculum without interference from …
Modernizing Marriage,
2011
Michigan State University College of Law
Modernizing Marriage, Adam Candeub, Mae Kuykendall
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article proposes to modernize the archaic procedures states use to authorize marriages so as to provide legal flexibility, promote efficiency, and enhance individual choice. Almost universally, states require couples' presence within their borders, however briefly, for a ceremony. After considering the historical and policy rationales for this requirement and finding them either obsolete or incoherent, we propose that states offer marriages to those outside their borders. Such distance marriages could occur via video-conference, using the internet or even telephone, with readily available safeguards to prevent fraud. This simple reform would allow certain couples who cannot marry under local law …
Can You Really Be A Good Role Model To Your Child If You Can't Braid Her Hair? The Unconstitutionality Of Factoring Gender And Sexuality Into Custody Determinations,
2011
CUNY School of Law
Can You Really Be A Good Role Model To Your Child If You Can't Braid Her Hair? The Unconstitutionality Of Factoring Gender And Sexuality Into Custody Determinations, Christina M. Tenuta
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
The High Price Of Misguided Legislation: Nevada's Need For Practical Sex Offender Laws,
2011
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
The High Price Of Misguided Legislation: Nevada's Need For Practical Sex Offender Laws, Stephanie Buntin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Joint Bank Accounts In New York: Confusion, Discrimination, And The Need For Change,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Joint Bank Accounts In New York: Confusion, Discrimination, And The Need For Change, Carolyn Satenberg
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note argues that New York's legal presumption of joint tenancy in joint bank accounts disproportionately burdens same-sex couples, leading to unfair gift and estate tax implications. It advocates for reforming New York's approach to align with the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), which better reflects depositor intent and reduces discrimination. The current system, compounded by federal policies like the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), exacerbates financial and emotional hardships for same-sex couples in tax and probate matters.
Referenda And The District Of Columbia's Human Rights Act: Voting On Same-Sex Marriage In The Nation's Capital,
2011
George Mason University
Referenda And The District Of Columbia's Human Rights Act: Voting On Same-Sex Marriage In The Nation's Capital, Jacob Stewart
Legislation and Policy Brief
Beginning with Massachusetts in 2003, the courts and legislatures of many states have had to decide whether same-sex marriage is or should be a fundamental right under their respective constitutions. Although only five states and the District of Columbia legally perform same-sex marriages, a few other jurisdictions are in the process of proposing laws moving in that direction. However, the vast majority of states are holding fast to the traditional heterosexual definition of marriage. Thirty-eight states have adopted some sort of Defense of Marriage Act, constitutional amendment, or similar measure that defines marriage as the union between one man and …
Who Am I And Who Do You Want Me To Be? Effectively Defining A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, And Transgender Social Group In Asylum Applications,
2011
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Who Am I And Who Do You Want Me To Be? Effectively Defining A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, And Transgender Social Group In Asylum Applications, Keith Southam
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Asylum law provides an area within immigration law that is unexpectedly friendly to lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgender persons. Persons who suffer persecution on account of "membership in a particular social group" are eligible to live and work in the United States. This encompasses lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgender persons who suffer persecution. However, United States law does not clearly define applicable standards in this area. As a result, different adjudicators in the asylum process focus on different methodological approaches and sometimes inject bias into the process. In addition, because the terms "lesbian," "gay," "bisexual," and "transgender" are …
The Iaaf Hyperandrogenism Regulations And Discrimination,
2011
Touro Law Center
The Iaaf Hyperandrogenism Regulations And Discrimination, Shawn Crincoli
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
