Securities Law Commons^™

Beyond Issuers: The Future Of Private Securities Litigation, Joshua Mitts

Faculty Scholarship

Private securities litigation has traditionally been viewed as a subfield of corporate governance, reducing agency costs by disciplining wayward management. In this brief Symposium essay, I argue that the future of private securities litigation lies beyond issuers. I discuss how a fraud claim under Rule 10b-5 can be understood as a kind of economic tort, and set out, in broad strokes, an economic analysis of claims against non-issuer defendants. I then consider emerging trends in the case law against non-issuers in social media and market manipulation cases. I conclude by identifying some challenges and opportunities for securities litigation in a …

Social (In)Securities: Should Mass Communication Via Social Media Give Rise To Seller Liability Under Section 12(A) Of The Securities Act? A Proposal To Reconcile The Emerging Circuit Split After Pino, Anika Austin

Brooklyn Law Review

The internet and social media have not only changed the way we shop, communicate, and seek information, but has also profoundly transformed the financial industry, reshaping how we seek and receive financial advice. Moving away from traditional advisor-client interactions, younger, digital-savvy generations favor seamless online experiences in every aspect of their lives. The rise of user-friendly trading applications and pandemic-driven online engagement has further accelerated this trend, introducing both opportunities and risks for users and those offering financial advice. The use of social media in promoting investments raises concerns about market manipulation, inadequate investor protections, and the application of outdated …

Insider Trading On Undisclosed Corporate Information: Diamond V. Oreamuno, John M. Whalen

Maine Law Review

The New York Court of Appeals recently ruled that a corporation may hold its officers and directors, who use material inside information, accountable for gains realized by them from transactions in the company's stock. The purpose of this note is to analyze Diamond v. Oreamuno in light of the existing federal law and to propose its application in the federal system.

The Private Offering: Rule 146 And Offeree Sophistication, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The fundamental premise of the Securities Act of 1933 is that protection of the investor is achieved by requiring the dissemination of information essential to an informed investment decision. Carved from this general requirement are exemptions from registration dealing with certain types of securities and transactions. This lack of clarity has created a situation in which the SEC continues to list the characteristics of a private offering while the judiciary seizes upon particular factors as determinative tests. In response to the need for "greater certainty in the application of the Section 4(2) exemption, the SEC has recently proposed Rule 146 …

Variable Life Insurance And The Federal Securities Laws, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The Securities and Exchange Commission has recently ruled that variable life insurance contracts are "securities" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, therefore, subject to the registration and disclosure requirements of those acts. Perhaps more significantly, the SEC also found the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 applicable to companies issuing variable life insurance, but decided to exempt insurance companies from the requirements of these statutes in deference to developing state regulation. This comment explores the legal issues raised by the SEC decision.

Variable Life Insurance And The Federal Securities Laws, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The Securities and Exchange Commission has recently ruled that variable life insurance contracts are "securities" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, therefore, subject to the registration and disclosure requirements of those acts. Perhaps more significantly, the SEC also found the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 applicable to companies issuing variable life insurance, but decided to exempt insurance companies from the requirements of these statutes in deference to developing state regulation. This comment explores the legal issues raised by the SEC decision.

The Private Offering: Rule 146 And Offeree Sophistication, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The fundamental premise of the Securities Act of 1933 is that protection of the investor is achieved by requiring the dissemination of information essential to an informed investment decision. Carved from this general requirement are exemptions from registration dealing with certain types of securities and transactions. This lack of clarity has created a situation in which the SEC continues to list the characteristics of a private offering while the judiciary seizes upon particular factors as determinative tests. In response to the need for "greater certainty in the application of the Section 4(2) exemption, the SEC has recently proposed Rule 146 …

Lanza V. Drexel & Company: Rule 10b-5 And The Outside Director, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

In Lanza v. Drexel & Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, over two vigorous dissents, held that a corporate director was not liable for negligence when he neither participated in stock transfer negotiations nor had knowledge of material misrepresentations and omissions made in those negotiations. The court rejected the proposition that rule 10b-5 imposed liability on nonparticipating directors for the negligent failure to communicate material adverse information to prospective purchasers. The analysis used in Lanza raises still further questions about the implications of rule 10b-5 and its relationship to section 11 of the 1933 Securities …

Forbes V. Wells Beach Casino And The Contemporaneous Ownership Rule, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

Prior to the enactment of Title 13-A of the Maine Business Corporation Act in January 1972, it was unsettled in Maine law whether a stockholder suing in a derivative action had to allege ownership of stock at the time of the wrongful transaction. In Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc., initiated before Title 13-A became effective, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court handed down its initial pronouncement on the stockholder standing issue. The decision makes clear that even in those jurisdictions where contemporaneous ownership is required, the rule is not absolute. The Maine court found that there are instances in which …

Corenco V. Schiavone: The Cash Tender Offeror As Corporate Raider, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The concern of both the federal and state courts in the litigation between Schiavone and Corenco was to provide adequate protection to the existing shareholders of the target company during the battle for corporate control. Viewed together, these cases illustrate the limits of federal protection and the possibility of further protection through state law. This Note analyzes the rationales of both decisions and considers whether further regulation is warranted.

No Lawyer, No Jail: A Critical Case Study Of Pragmatism And The Flaws Of “Purposeful” Decision Making In Argersinger V. Hamlin, Alisa Smith, Sarah K. Stice

Seattle University Law Review

By releasing conference notes and internal communications, Supreme Court Justices provide insight into the otherwise private decisionmaking process, shedding light on how case outcomes and legal reasoning are framed and negotiated. The watershed case of Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) extended the constitutional right to counsel to some, but not all, misdemeanor defendants. The case was argued twice, and the Court relied on empirical and authoritative sources to answer complex and practical questions about requiring counsel. This case study employs critical discourse analysis to uncover what influenced the Justices’ decisions and how they framed, shaped, and constructed social realities to foreground …

Modern Day Colonialism Through HawaiʻI’S Quiet Title And Partition Laws, Cheyann Fujii

Seattle University Law Review

This Note will attempt to highlight important aspects of Hawaiian history to provide readers with a clear picture on how Native Hawaiians are still impacted by colonialism, specifically when plaintiffs bring a quiet title or partition action against Native Hawaiian owners of kuleana lands. Before colonization, the concept of private land ownership did not exist in Hawai‘i, and Native Hawaiians adopted a feudal system by dividing land into geographical areas. Missionaries and businessmen brought Western ideas to Hawai‘i and influenced legislation such as the Great Māhele and the Kuleana Land Act of 1850, which solidified the concept of private property. …

Data Advantage And Merger Review: Can Entrenchment Theory Reform Antitrust Enforcement?, Shin-Ru Cheng

Seattle University Law Review

A merger involving giant digital companies is likely to dampen competition, as it allows those companies to combine and control data access, enabling them to entrench their dominant positions in relevant markets and extend those positions into related markets. While competition law in many jurisdictions aims to prohibit mergers that may substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly, arguably the review of digital mergers is failing because antitrust agencies lack an effective approach to identify data-generated anticompetitive harms. This Article demonstrates that entrenchment theory, recently reintroduced in the 2023 U.S. Merger Guidelines, would help reform the process of antitrust enforcement. …

Defining Deference: Impacts Of Abandoning Chevron On Emerging Technology Governance And Administrative Law, R. Aubrey Davis Iii

Seattle University Law Review

Emerging technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), often lead to unforeseen legal outcomes. Notable abuses in areas such as facial recognition, employment bias, and housing discrimination are well known. However, legislative responses to these issues either have been largely reactive or there has been no legislative response at all. In lieu of legislation, agencies have sought to fill the gap. For example, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently proposed a rule mandating voter notification for all AI-generated political phone calls citing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 as authority. However, the TCPA was originally passed to curtail telemarketing, not …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Caution: Potholes In E-Scooter Data Collection, Dakota Rakestraw

Seattle University Law Review

Lime scooters keep ending up in major waterways in Washington state metro areas, a testament to the ubiquity of e-scooters in the metropolitan landscape. How they get there is unclear. Why they get there is even murkier. Perhaps the answer lies in the implications of modern geolocation data collection through e-scooters and gaps in current data collection regulation curbing individual liberties.

Since September 2020, electric scooters have run Seattle’s streets and have dramatically overtaken ridesharing bike trips. For example, from September 2020 to September 2021, there were about 1.4 million scooter and bike trips with September 2021 seeing 300,000 scooter …

Machinists Preemption In The New Administrative Law, Andrew J. Ziaja

Seattle University Law Review

This Article assesses Machinists preemption—a labor-specific form of implied field preemption—while freshly considering implications both for and of new developments in administrative law. The radical transformation of administrative law in the Supreme Court, particularly its newfound emphasis on clear-statement rules, provides opportunities to reconsider the Machinists rationale. Aligning with scholars who have called to question the doctrine’s “ossifying” influence on labor and employment policy, it argues that the modern-day version of Machinists preemption clashes with the Supreme Court’s newly constrained view of delegated power and its differing conceptions of the major questions doctrine.

On the other hand, Machinists preemption might …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

The Race To Erase: Destruction Of Government Documents Undermines Freedom-Of-Information Laws, Frank D. Lomonte

Seattle University Law Review

In August 2019, reporters with Chattanooga’s daily newspaper, the Times Free Press, filed what seemed to be a routine request for access to emails and other public records held by their local county government. The seemingly unremarkable request set the newspaper’s staff on a months-long journey of unpleasant surprises. The first was a demand to pay the county $717 in advance before being allowed to inspect the documents. The second was that—during prolonged haggling over the fee assessment— the county attorney’s office simply destroyed almost all of the disputed records. Third, and most glaringly, the journalists discovered that Tennessee law …

When You’Re Arrested For A Felony In Seattle, You’Ll Meet Me., Austin Field

Seattle University Law Review

In this Essay, Austin Field, a practicing public defender, uses a first-person perspective to describe what it is like to meet a criminal defendant for the first time. He explains the process from start to finish, detailing everything from the way he introduces himself to how bail works.

"I’ll ask you for your name. Most of the time, you tell me. I check your name against my list. On any given day I’m supposed to interview between five and fifteen people. I have a lot of questions for you. We only have about ten minutes."