Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
The Race To Erase: Destruction Of Government Documents Undermines Freedom-Of-Information Laws,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
The Race To Erase: Destruction Of Government Documents Undermines Freedom-Of-Information Laws, Frank D. Lomonte
Seattle University Law Review
In August 2019, reporters with Chattanooga’s daily newspaper, the Times Free Press, filed what seemed to be a routine request for access to emails and other public records held by their local county government. The seemingly unremarkable request set the newspaper’s staff on a months-long journey of unpleasant surprises. The first was a demand to pay the county $717 in advance before being allowed to inspect the documents. The second was that—during prolonged haggling over the fee assessment— the county attorney’s office simply destroyed almost all of the disputed records. Third, and most glaringly, the journalists discovered that Tennessee law …
When You’Re Arrested For A Felony In Seattle, You’Ll Meet Me.,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
When You’Re Arrested For A Felony In Seattle, You’Ll Meet Me., Austin Field
Seattle University Law Review
In this Essay, Austin Field, a practicing public defender, uses a first-person perspective to describe what it is like to meet a criminal defendant for the first time. He explains the process from start to finish, detailing everything from the way he introduces himself to how bail works.
"I’ll ask you for your name. Most of the time, you tell me. I check your name against my list. On any given day I’m supposed to interview between five and fifteen people. I have a lot of questions for you. We only have about ten minutes."
The Public Square In A Private-Property Obsessed Country: What New York City’S Pops Regulations Get Right And Why Other Cities Should (Mostly) Copy Them,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
The Public Square In A Private-Property Obsessed Country: What New York City’S Pops Regulations Get Right And Why Other Cities Should (Mostly) Copy Them, Carson Mcgregor
Seattle University Law Review
When New York City (NYC) was first becoming the metropolitan monolith it is today, it had a problem: the city streets were chock full of skyscrapers, and sunlight, air, and usable open space were at a premium. In response, the City promulgated its first Privately Owned Public Spaces (POPS) regulations, which allowed developers to build skyward in exchange for providing public space on the street level. Unfortunately, in July of 2023, the New York Times (NYT) discovered that New Yorkers received only a fraction of what they were promised. Building owners received billions of dollars’ worth of added floor space, …
Intellectual Property Or Modern Folklore? The Problem With Open Gaming Licenses In Tabletop Gaming,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Intellectual Property Or Modern Folklore? The Problem With Open Gaming Licenses In Tabletop Gaming, Rosie Midget
Seattle University Law Review
This Note addresses how courts and legislatures should address “Open Gaming Licenses” commonly attached to tabletop roleplaying games (TTRPGs), which game publishers use to promote a false image of accessibility—misleading consumers and building goodwill from the misunderstanding. Part I discusses what TTRPGs are, including the defining features of the hobby and culture surrounding it, as well as the unique interplay between publishers and players. Part II explores the question of which elements in a TTRPG system may be subject to copyright protection. Part III examines these elements in practice using Wizards of the Coast’s Dungeons and Dragons TTRPG as a …
A Primer On The Proximate Cause Requirement Of Plcaa’S Predicate Firearm Exception: Holding Firearm Manufacturers Liable For Third-Party Criminal Misuse Of Their Products,
2025
University of Georgia School of Law
A Primer On The Proximate Cause Requirement Of Plcaa’S Predicate Firearm Exception: Holding Firearm Manufacturers Liable For Third-Party Criminal Misuse Of Their Products, Hillel Y. Levin, Timothy D. Lytton
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second Amendment Principles,
2025
Harvard Law School
Second Amendment Principles, Jamie G. Mcwilliam
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In United States v. Rahimi, the Supreme Court explained that firearm regulations “must comport with the principles underlying the Second Amendment.” This Article examines what those principles are, how to derive them, and how to apply them in concrete cases. It begins with the Second Amendment’s core principle of defense of self and community, which traces its lineage back to classical thinkers like Aquinas and Grotius. The tradition of firearm regulation that surrounded the adoption of the Second Amendment depended on this fundamental principle. But it also developed subsidiary principles that implement the defense principle in specific ways. This …
Building Layered Defenses To Reduce Illegal Gun Violence,
2025
Barry University
Building Layered Defenses To Reduce Illegal Gun Violence, Samuel Kan
Faculty Scholarship
This article examines a multifaceted approach to reducing illegal gun violence in the United States through the implementation of layered defense strategies. While acknowledging the constitutional protections afforded by the Second Amendment, the author argues that targeted legislative and community-based interventions can effectively reduce gun violence without infringing on lawful gun ownership rights. The analysis explores several key defensive measures, including extreme risk laws (risk protection orders), which allow for temporary firearm removal from individuals posing credible threats to themselves or others—a practice recently upheld by the Supreme Court in United States v. Rahimi. The article further examines the constitutional …
Paths Forward From The Age Of Gun Violence: An Introduction,
2025
Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Paths Forward From The Age Of Gun Violence: An Introduction, William Clark
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Panic! At The Ballroom: The 1804 New Orleans Ballroom Weapons Ban In A Post-Bruen Context,
2025
Everytown for Gun Safety
Panic! At The Ballroom: The 1804 New Orleans Ballroom Weapons Ban In A Post-Bruen Context, Kellen Heniford, Kari Still
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
But For A Free Press: A Response To Press Freedom Skeptics,
2025
Cleveland State University College of Law
But For A Free Press: A Response To Press Freedom Skeptics, Kevin F. O'Neill, Patrick J. Charles
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article is divided into three Parts. Part I will outline the history-in-law case forwhy the historical record sufficiently supports recognizing distinct constitutional press freedoms. Part II then provides a history-in-law response to some of the most common arguments made by press freedom skeptics as to why distinct constitutional press freedoms should not be recognized by the courts. Lastly, Part III makes the case for why the recognition of distinct constitutional press freedoms should become a jurisprudential reality and provides a roadmap to accomplish this.
The Founders’ Common Law And Bruen’S Text, History, And Tradition Test: From History ‘Lite’ To History Right,
2025
Fordham University
The Founders’ Common Law And Bruen’S Text, History, And Tradition Test: From History ‘Lite’ To History Right, Saul Cornell
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of Lawful Self-Defense: State Criminal Law And The Scope Of The Second Amendment,
2025
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
The Meaning Of Lawful Self-Defense: State Criminal Law And The Scope Of The Second Amendment, Shira Feldman, Tess Fardon
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Keeping With Heller,
2025
Tulane University School of Law
In Keeping With Heller, Kevin Schascheck
Buffalo Law Review
Evaluating the constitutionality of modern firearm regulations under the Second Amendment requires recourse to historical evidence under Bruen v. New York State Rifle and Pistol Association. Generally, the government bears the burden to demonstrate that modern firearm regulations are consistent with the nation’s historical traditions. But the Supreme Court’s earlier opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller stated that certain categories of firearm restrictions are longstanding and thus presumptively lawful. And yet, litigants are inviting courts to reject this presumption, arguing that presumptively lawful regulations should be subject to the same historical test as presumptively unlawful regulations.
Courts should reject …
Gun Regulation After Loper Bright: The Statutory Interpretation/Policymaking Continuum,
2025
Brooklyn Law School
Gun Regulation After Loper Bright: The Statutory Interpretation/Policymaking Continuum, William D. Araiza
Buffalo Law Review
The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, rejecting “Chevron deference” to administrative agency interpretations of their organic statutes, has caused great uncertainty about the fate of federal regulation. This Essay considers that question in the context of federal gun regulation. Using examples of regulatory actions taken by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, it illustrates the wide range of functions reflected in agency actions—in particular, how those actions can span the spectrum from pure statutory interpretation to pure policymaking, with hybrid way stations between those two extremes.
The variety of functions agencies perform suggests …
Bruen In A Changing Judiciary,
2025
Duke Law School
Bruen In A Changing Judiciary, Joseph Blocher
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Judges, Guns, And Maga,
2025
Duke Law
Judges, Guns, And Maga, Brannon P. Denning
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Historical Firearm Licensing And Permitting Laws,
2025
Penn State Dickinson Law
Historical Firearm Licensing And Permitting Laws, Robert J. Spitzer
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
The Waiting Is The Hardest Part: The Constitutionality Of Firearm Waiting Periods,
2025
Penn State Dickinson Law
The Waiting Is The Hardest Part: The Constitutionality Of Firearm Waiting Periods, F. Lee Francis
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This Article examines the constitutionality of firearm waiting period laws through the lens of the Supreme Court’s evolving Second Amendment jurisprudence. Although such laws are frequently defended as prudent public safety measures, their validity turns not on legislative purpose but on constitutional principle, particularly as framed in District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen.
Under those decisions, the scope of the Second Amendment is determined not by judicial balancing of contemporary interests, but by reference to the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. The Article surveys that tradition and finds no …
When Rights Require Permission: The Discriminatory History Of Licensing Laws For Firearm Possession,
2025
Penn State Dickinson Law
When Rights Require Permission: The Discriminatory History Of Licensing Laws For Firearm Possession, Bob Barr, Joseph G.S. Greenlee
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
