Masterpiece Cakeshop And The Future Of Religious Freedom,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
Masterpiece Cakeshop And The Future Of Religious Freedom, Mark L. Movsesian
Faculty Publications
Last term, the Supreme Court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop, one of several recent cases in which religious believers have sought to avoid the application of public accommodations laws that ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The Court’s decision was a narrow one that turned on unique facts and did relatively little to resolve the conflict between anti-discrimination laws and religious freedom. Yet Masterpiece Cakeshop is significant, because it reflects broad cultural and political trends that drive that conflict and shape its resolution: a deepening religious polarization between the Nones and the Traditionally Religious; an expanding conception of equality that …
The Locke Exception: What Trinity Lutheran Means For The Future Of State Blaine Amendments,
2019
Pepperdine University
The Locke Exception: What Trinity Lutheran Means For The Future Of State Blaine Amendments, Christopher Tyler Prosser
Pepperdine Law Review
At its core, this Article is about whether states have the discretion to discriminate against religious organizations by excluding them from generally available secular government aid programs. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Locke v. Davey, the federal courts have developed conflicting interpretations of whether the Court’s holding in Locke permits states to exclude religious organizations from generally available secular aid programs. However, the Court’s 2017 decision in Trinity Lutheran v. Comer has cast doubt on the ability of states to exclude religious organizations from such programs and seemingly restricts the Court’s prior decision in Locke …
Thinking Slow About Abercrombie & Fitch: Straightening Out The Judicial Confusion In The Lower Courts,
2019
Pepperdine University
Thinking Slow About Abercrombie & Fitch: Straightening Out The Judicial Confusion In The Lower Courts, Bruce N. Cameron, Blaine L. Hutchison
Pepperdine Law Review
In Abercrombie & Fitch, the U.S. Supreme Court fundamentally changed the way that Title VII religious accommodation cases are litigated and evaluated. This paper analyzes Abercrombie, explains how the Court eliminated religious accommodation as a freestanding cause of action, and suggests an altered proof framework for plaintiffs seeking an accommodation. The paper also explores the conflict between employee privacy rights and classic proof requirements for religious sincerity. The lower courts have largely failed to apprehend the change mandated by Abercrombie, with the result that their opinions are in disarray. The paper includes a chart organizing the diverse lower court opinions.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 169b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 169b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 174b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 174b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 176b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 176b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 171b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 171b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 178b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 178b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 181b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 181b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 179b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 179b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: Jane Doe Ii-B,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: Jane Doe Ii-B, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: Moira Kehoe Alger (Janed Hh-B),
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: Moira Kehoe Alger (Janed Hh-B), Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 167b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 167b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 155b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 155b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 134b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 134b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 157b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 157b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 95b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 95b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 145b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 145b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 161b,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: John Doe 161b, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Claim Form: Jane Doe P-B,
2019
University of New Mexico
Proof Of Claim Form: Jane Doe P-B, Hall & Monagle, Llc
Proofs of Claims
No abstract provided.
