State Bar Of California,
2018
University of San Diego
State Bar Of California, Edith Jimenez, Andrew J. Van Arsdale, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Medical Board Of California,
2018
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Kayla Watson, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy,
2018
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, Mariam J. Saleh, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing,
2018
University of San Diego
Board Of Registered Nursing, Ashkan Hayatdavoudi, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board,
2018
University of San Diego
Veterinary Medical Board, Bryan Yerger, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy,
2018
University of San Diego
California Board Of Accountancy, Anna V. Randall, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education,
2018
University of San Diego
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Daniel Ballinger, R. C. Fellmeth, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Insurance,
2018
University of San Diego
Department Of Insurance, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Punitive Preemption And The First Amendment,
2018
University of San Diego
Punitive Preemption And The First Amendment, Rachel Proctor May
San Diego Law Review
In recent years, state legislators have begun passing a new breed of “punitive” preemption laws–those that impose fines, civil and criminal sanctions, and other sanctions on local governments and their officials as a consequence of passing laws or enacting policies that are inconsistent with state laws. This represents a significant change from traditional preemption, under which a local government could enact laws based on its view of preempting state statutes and applicable state constitutional provisions and, if necessary, defend its interpretation in court. When punitive preemption prevents a local lawmaking process from taking place, the state forecloses a unique form …
The Legal Foundations Of White Supremacy,
2018
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The Legal Foundations Of White Supremacy, Erika Wilson
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Hidden In Plain View: Juries And The Implicit Credibility Given To Police Testimony,
2018
University of North Carolina School of Law
Hidden In Plain View: Juries And The Implicit Credibility Given To Police Testimony, Jonathan M. Warren
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Discriminatory Nationality Laws Must Be Eliminated In Order To Eradicate Statelessness,
2018
DePaul University
Discriminatory Nationality Laws Must Be Eliminated In Order To Eradicate Statelessness, Neda Shaheen
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Ageism, Human Rights, And The European Court Of Human Rights: A Critical Analysis Of The Carvalho V. Portugal Case (2017),
2018
University of Haifa
Ageism, Human Rights, And The European Court Of Human Rights: A Critical Analysis Of The Carvalho V. Portugal Case (2017), Eugenio Mantovani, Dr. Benny Spanier, Prof. Israel (Issi) Doron
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
“I Made A Huge Mistake With My Life” – The Harms Of Prostitution As Mis-Reflected In Israeli Law,
2018
University of Haifa
“I Made A Huge Mistake With My Life” – The Harms Of Prostitution As Mis-Reflected In Israeli Law, Gal Amir, Shulamit Almog
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Safety From Flawed Forensic Sciences Evidence,
2018
Academic Center of Law & Business, Israel
Safety From Flawed Forensic Sciences Evidence, Boaz Sangero
Georgia State University Law Review
This article addresses the way to safety in the context of forensic sciences evidence. After presenting the current lack of safety, which I term “unsafety,” I raise some possible safety measures to contend with this. My suggestions are grounded on two bases: first, the specific analysis of each type of evidence in line with the most recent research on the subject; and second, modern safety theory and its application to the criminal justice system. It is important to stress that my proposals represent only some of the conceivable safety measures. Developing a comprehensive safety theory for the criminal justice system …
Georgia State Law Review Symposium Keynote Address: Uncovering Forensic Flaws - An Outside Perspective,
2018
The Washington Post
Georgia State Law Review Symposium Keynote Address: Uncovering Forensic Flaws - An Outside Perspective, Spencer S. Hsu
Georgia State University Law Review
This transcript is a reproduction of the Keynote Address by Spencer Hsu at the 2017–2018 Georgia State University Law Review Symposium — From the Crime Scene to the Court room: The Future of Forensic Science Reform — on April 6, 2018.
Spencer Hsu is an investigative reporter at the Washington Post, a two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist, and a national Emmy Award nominee.
The Uk Forensic Science Regulator: A Model For Forensic Science Regulation?,
2018
Northumbria Law School
The Uk Forensic Science Regulator: A Model For Forensic Science Regulation?, Carole Mccartney, Emmanuel N. Amoako
Georgia State University Law Review
The use of an array of scientific techniques and technologies is now considered customary within criminal justice, with technological developments and scientific advancements regularly added to the crime investigator’s arsenal. However, the scientific basis, reliability, and fallibility of the application of such “forensic science” (and the resulting scientific evidence) continues to come under intense scrutiny. In response to apparently irremediable problems with the quality of scientific evidence in the United Kingdom (UK), the government created the role of “Forensic Science Regulator” in 2007.
The introduction of a regulator was intended to establish quality standards for all forensic science providers in …
Effects Of Senate Bill 4 On Wage-Theft: Why All Workers Are At Risk In Low-Income Occupations,
2018
St. Mary's University School of Law
Effects Of Senate Bill 4 On Wage-Theft: Why All Workers Are At Risk In Low-Income Occupations, Daniella Salas-Chacon
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming
An Honest But Fearless Fighter: The Adversarial Ideal Of Public Defenders In 1930s And ’40s Los Angeles,
2018
Vanderbilt University Law School
An Honest But Fearless Fighter: The Adversarial Ideal Of Public Defenders In 1930s And ’40s Los Angeles, Sara Mayeux
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Vercoe's self-description as a courtroom "fighter" illuminates public defenders' professional identity in the United States in the decades after the criminal courts had developed into a modem bureaucracy, but before the Warren Court constitutionalized criminal procedure. Historians have characterized lawyering for the poor as outside the mainstream of adversar- ial legal culture, describing a "two-tiered legal system" in which lawyers celebrated courtroom combat on behalf of paying clients but relegated the indigent to a lesser form of advocacy that valorized "compromise." Comporting with this characterization, legal scholars have portrayed early public defenders as "assembly-line" workers who conducted little factual investigation …
Sanctuary Cities And The Trump Administration: The Practical Limits Of Federal Power,
2018
The George Washington University Law School
Sanctuary Cities And The Trump Administration: The Practical Limits Of Federal Power, Joshua W. Dansby
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
On January 25, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order with the supposed purpose of enhancing public safety of the interior of the United States. Part of the Administration’s plan includes threatening “sanctuary jurisdictions,” also known as “sanctuary cities,” with the loss of federal funds for failing to comply with federal law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1373.
There are several problems with this plan: (1) there is no solid definition for what makes a city a “sanctuary;” (2) if we accept the Administration’s allusion that a sanctuary jurisdiction is one that “willfully” refuses to comply with 8 U.S.C. …
