Medical Board Of California,
2019
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Angela O'Hara, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board,
2019
University of San Diego
Veterinary Medical Board, Christine Lambert, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Public Utilities Commission,
2019
University of San Diego
Public Utilities Commission, Michael J. Melton, Marcus Friedman, Strider Kachelein, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Judicial Partisanship In A Partisan Era: A Reply To Professor Robertson,
2019
University of Maine School of Law
Judicial Partisanship In A Partisan Era: A Reply To Professor Robertson, Dmitry Bam
Faculty Publications
Professor Cassandra Burke Robertson’s outstanding article, Judicial Impartiality in A Partisan Era, is timely given the increasing politicization of the judiciary. The political debate and controversy around the Judge Garland nomination and the Justice Kavanaugh confirmation to the United States Supreme Court, only served to reaffirm that the judiciary is not immune from the growing political polarization in America. And it is not just senate judicial confirmation battles that have become highly bitter and partisan. Scholars writing about the substantive work of the Court have argued that it is more akin to a political body than a judicial one, and …
Techniques For Regulating Military Force,
2019
University of Michigan Law School
Techniques For Regulating Military Force, Monica Hakimi
Book Chapters
This chapter draws on the five chapters that follow—each of which describes the war powers in a single country—to identify and analyze some of the techniques for regulating this area of foreign affairs and then to reflect on the value of comparative research on it. Three basic techniques are: (1) to establish substantive standards on when the government may or may not use force, (2) to divide among different branches of government the authority to deploy the country’s armed forces, and (3) to subject such decisions to oversight or review. There is considerable variation, both across countries and over time …
Board Of Pharmacy,
2019
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, Stephanie Mendivil, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy,
2019
University of San Diego
California Board Of Accountancy, Thomas Burke, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Robot Criminals,
2019
National University of Singapore
Robot Criminals, Ying Hu
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
When a robot harms humans, are there any grounds for holding it criminally liable for its misconduct? Yes, provided that the robot is capable of making, acting on, and communicating the reasons behind its moral decisions. If such a robot fails to observe the minimum moral standards that society requires of it, labeling it as a criminal can effectively fulfill criminal law’s function of censuring wrongful conduct and alleviating the emotional harm that may be inflicted on human victims.
Imposing criminal liability on robots does not absolve robot manufacturers, trainers, or owners of their individual criminal liability. The former is …
Committee Of Bar Examiners,
2019
University of San Diego
Committee Of Bar Examiners, Halie Turigliatti, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Singapore Convention And The Metamorphosis Of Contractual Litigation,
2019
UNCITRAL
The Singapore Convention And The Metamorphosis Of Contractual Litigation, Jean-Christophe Boulet
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This article addresses the grounds provided for in Article 5 of the Singapore Convention for the refusal of enforcement of a settlement agreement or for the refusal of a settlement agreement as evidence that the dispute has been resolved. It is divided into three sections. The first section briefly places these grounds in the context of the Singapore Convention as a whole as well as the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The second section is devoted to a more detailed examination of the various grounds listed in Article 5 of the Convention, …
Department Of Insurance,
2019
University of San Diego
Department Of Insurance, Marie Mcdonald Hulen, Brittany Hodgson, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Dental Board Of California,
2019
University of San Diego
Dental Board Of California, Katie Abajian, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Business Oversight,
2019
University of San Diego
Department Of Business Oversight, James D. Colleran, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Everybody Out Of The Pool: Recognizing A First Amendment Claim For The Retaliatory Closure Of (Real Or Virtual) Public Forums,
2019
University of Florida
Everybody Out Of The Pool: Recognizing A First Amendment Claim For The Retaliatory Closure Of (Real Or Virtual) Public Forums, Frank D. Lomonte
University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
They Still Just Don’T Get It: The Lessons Of The #Metoo Movement Through The Lens Of Supreme Court Nominations,
2019
University of Richmond - School of Law
They Still Just Don’T Get It: The Lessons Of The #Metoo Movement Through The Lens Of Supreme Court Nominations, Maryann Grover
Law Student Publications
Many have hailed the #MeToo Movement as a turning point in the way this country discusses sexual assault and sexual harassment, but when looking at the #MeToo Movement through the lens of Supreme Court nominations, it is unclear whether the impact of the Movement will be as farreaching as some imagine. The hearing of Anita Hill, which came before the #MeToo Movement, and the hearing of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, which came after the #MeToo Movement, perhaps demonstrate that the #MeToo Movement has reached its limit culturally and now institutional change must be the focus in order for the goals …
Qualified Immunity And Constitutional Structure,
2019
Duke University School of Law
Qualified Immunity And Constitutional Structure, Katherine Mims Crocker
Michigan Law Review
A range of scholars has subjected qualified immunity to a wave of criticism— and for good reasons. But the Supreme Court continues to apply the doctrine in ever more aggressive ways. By advancing two claims, this Article seeks to make some sense of this conflict and to suggest some thoughts toward a resolution.
First, while the Court has offered and scholars have rejected several rationales for the doctrine, layering in an account grounded in structural constitutional concerns provides a historically richer and analytically thicker understanding of the current qualified-immunity regime. For suits against federal officials, qualified immunity acts as a …
Proceedings Of Expert Forum On First Nations Social Assistance Reform, September 3, 2019,
2019
Assistant Professor and Chancellor’s Chair in Aboriginal Law and Policy at the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University
Proceedings Of Expert Forum On First Nations Social Assistance Reform, September 3, 2019, Naiomi Metallic, Fred Wien
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Social assistance, whether directed to the mainstream population or to First Nations, is not – according to Forum participants -- a sexy topic. Specifically, with respect to First Nation persons living on reserve in Canada, it has been largely a neglected field except for those directly responsible for administering it. Despite its substantive importance, it has not received a lot of attention from the academic research community, for example, nor is it usually near the top of the list of priorities for political leaders and governments.
Why is this the case? Perhaps it has to do with the history of …
Call For Inputs: Climate Change And Human Rights: A Safe Climate,
2019
Schulich School of Law and Marine & Environmental Law Institute, Dalhousie University
Call For Inputs: Climate Change And Human Rights: A Safe Climate, Sara L. Seck, Lisa Benjamin
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
There is now global agreement that human rights norms apply to the full spectrum of environmental issues, including climate change. The previous Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, Mr. John Knox, developed Framework Principles on Human Rights and the Environment that set forth three sets of duties that engage both States and businesses: procedural obligations; substantive obligations; and obligations relating to those in vulnerable situations.
The current Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, Mr. David Boyd, is working to provide additional clarity regarding the substantive obligations relating to a range of elements that are essential to …
State Standing For Nationwide Injunctions Against The Federal Government,
2019
Emory University School of Law
State Standing For Nationwide Injunctions Against The Federal Government, Jonathan R. Nash
Faculty Articles
Recent years have seen a substantial increase of cases in which states seek, and indeed obtain, nationwide injunctions against the federal government. These cases implicate two complicated questions: first, when a state has standing to sue the federal government, and second, when a nationwide injunction is a proper form of relief. For their part, scholars have mostly addressed these questions separately. In this Essay, I analyze the two questions together. Along the way, I identify drawbacks and benefits of nationwide injunctions, as well as settings where nationwide injunctions may be desirable and undesirable. I present arguments that, although I do …
A Skeptical View Of Information Fiduciaries,
2019
Columbia Law School
A Skeptical View Of Information Fiduciaries, Lina M. Khan, David E. Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
The concept of “information fiduciaries” has surged to the forefront of debates on online-platform regulation. Developed by Professor Jack Balkin, the concept is meant to rebalance the relationship between ordinary individuals and the digital companies that accumulate, analyze, and sell their personal data for profit. Just as the law imposes special duties of care, confidentiality, and loyalty on doctors, lawyers, and accountants vis-à-vis their patients and clients, Balkin argues, so too should it impose special duties on corporations such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter vis-à-vis their end users. Over the past several years, this argument has garnered remarkably broad support …
