Table Of Contents,
2017
University of Richmond
2016 Symposium Keynote Address,
2017
Attorney General, Virginia
2016 Symposium Keynote Address, Mark Herring
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Resurgence Of Heroin: Benefiting From The Current Political Climate,
2017
University of Richmond
The Resurgence Of Heroin: Benefiting From The Current Political Climate, Timothy S. Coyne
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Longitudinal And Experimental Study Of The
Impact Of Knowledge On The Bases Of
Institutional Trust,
2017
University of Nebraska
A Longitudinal And Experimental Study Of The Impact Of Knowledge On The Bases Of Institutional Trust, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Christopher D. Kimbrough, Ellie Shockley, Tess M.S. Neal, Mitchel Herian, Joseph A. Hamm, Brian H. Bornstein, Alan Tomkins
Lisa PytlikZillig Publications
This study examined a knowledge-centered theory of institutional trust development. In the context of trust in water regulatory institutions, the moderating impact of knowledge was tested to determine if there were longitudinal changes in the bases of institutional trust as a function of increases in knowledge about a target institution. We hypothesized that as people learn about an institution with which they were previously unfamiliar, they begin to form more nuanced perceptions, distinguishing the new institution from other institutions and relying less upon their generalized trust to estimate their trust in that institution. Prior to having specific, differential information about …
Bureaucracy As Violence,
2017
Wayne State University
Bureaucracy As Violence, Jonathan Weinberg
Michigan Law Review
Review of The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy by David Graeber.
Obligations Versus Rights: Substantive Difference Between Wto And International Investment Law,
2017
University of Western Ontario
Obligations Versus Rights: Substantive Difference Between Wto And International Investment Law, Chios Carmody
Law Publications
WTO law remains relatively uncontentious whereas international investment law elicits much more debate. This article posits that the differences in reception are attributable to deeper substantive differences about what is protected under each regime. In WTO law what is protected is the sum total of all commitments and concessions under the WTO Agreement, something that can be thought of as a “public” good. When a country injures that good, the remedy is for the country to cease the injury, a requirement that naturally places emphasis on obligation. In international investment law, by contrast, what is protected is individualized to a …
Tort Law Inside Out,
2017
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Tort Law Inside Out, Cristina Carmody Tilley
Faculty Publications
For more than a century, scholars have been looking at tort law from the outside in. Theorists committed to external goals like efficient allocation of resources or moral justice have treated tort as a mere vehicle for the achievement of their policy preferences, rather than as a body of law with a discernible internal purpose. It is time to revisit tort on its own terms.
This Article takes its cue from the New Doctrinalists, who urge that extralegal normative insights from fields such as economics or philosophy aid adjudication only when they are directly tethered to legal concepts; that is, …
Penn Central Take Two,
2017
Vanderbilt Law School
Penn Central Take Two, Christopher Serkin
Notre Dame Law Review
Penn Central v. New York City is the most important regulatory takings case of all time. There, the Supreme Court upheld the historic preservation of Grand Central Terminal in part because the City offset the burden of the landmarking with a valuable new property interest—a transferable development right (TDR)—that could be sold to neighboring property. Extraordinarily, 1.2 million square feet of those very same TDRs, still unused for over forty years, are the subject of newly resolved takings litigation. According to the complaint, the TDRs that saved Grand Central were themselves taken by the government, which allegedly wiped out their …
Poverty Is The New Crime,
2017
DePaul University
Poverty Is The New Crime, Michelle Jenkins
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Social Justice And Legal Writing Collaborations: Promoting Student Engagement And Faculty Fulfillment,
2017
Florida Coastal School of Law
Social Justice And Legal Writing Collaborations: Promoting Student Engagement And Faculty Fulfillment, Kirsten Clement, Stephanie Roberts Hartung
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Cycle Of Misconduct:How Chicago Has Repeatedly Failed To Police Its Police,
2017
DePaul University
Cycle Of Misconduct:How Chicago Has Repeatedly Failed To Police Its Police, Elizabeth J. Andonova
DePaul Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents,
2017
DePaul University
Table Of Contents,
2017
University of Richmond
Letter From The Editor,
2017
Editor-in-Chief
Letter From The Editor, Bryce Buchmann
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
"You Have No God": An Analysis Of The Prosecution Of Genocidal Rape In International Criminal Law,
2017
University of Richmond
"You Have No God": An Analysis Of The Prosecution Of Genocidal Rape In International Criminal Law, Cassie Powell
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
A New Legal Framework For Children Seeking Special Immigrant Juvenile Status,
2017
University of Richmond
A New Legal Framework For Children Seeking Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, Dalia Castillo-Granados, Yasmin Yavar
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Cities Held Hostage: Public Stadiums And Pro Sports Franchises,
2017
University of Richmond
American Cities Held Hostage: Public Stadiums And Pro Sports Franchises, David Schein, James Phillips, Caroline Rider
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action Invidiousness,
2017
University of Richmond
Affirmative Action Invidiousness, Mark Strasser
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capitalism And Unfreedom: Louis D. Brandeis And A Liberty Of The Left,
2017
CUNY Graduate Center
Capitalism And Unfreedom: Louis D. Brandeis And A Liberty Of The Left, Eric L. Apar
Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects
The American Right features a well-developed—and well-heeled—infrastructure for promoting a conception of freedom as inextricable from capitalism. The American Left, by contrast, has seemed content to cede the territory, abandoning the ground of freedom for the terrain of “equality,” “justice,” “fairness,” and “prosperity.” This paper is an effort to address this asymmetry in the public discourse over the meaning of freedom. Its principal objective is to capture the vision of freedom embodied in the political and economic thought of Louis D. Brandeis, one of the American Left’s ablest expositors of freedom.
In addition, the paper has three subsidiary objectives. The …
Applying Motivational Interviewing To Parenting Act Mediation: The Promise Of The Process.,
2017
University of Nebraska College of Law
Applying Motivational Interviewing To Parenting Act Mediation: The Promise Of The Process., Kristen M. Blankley, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Kathryn Speck
Lisa PytlikZillig Publications
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a research-based method of helping people engage in behavior change. MI tools and strategies have been used successfully to help people tackle drug and alcohol addiction, weight loss, and other unhealthy behaviors. MI methods aim to uncover and support a person's desire to change while simultaneously respecting an individual's autonomy. Historically, Ml has been employed in support settings, such as counselors working with clients. In Nebraska, probation officers now employ MI practices to help encourage positive changes while still maintaining accountability if people choose not to follow the terms of their probation.
Mediation is all about …
