"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights, Nicole B. Godfrey
Seattle University Law Review
This Article argues for increased legal protections for prisoners who choose to engage in group protest to shed light on the conditions of their incarceration. A companion piece to a similar article that focused on prisoner free speech rights, this Article uses the acts of protest utilized by the Silent Sentinels to examine why prisoners’ rights to petition and association should be strengthened. By strengthening these rights, the Article argues that we will advance the values enshrined by the First Amendment’s Petition Clause while simultaneously advancing the rights of the incarcerated millions with little to no political power.
The Article …
Cve And Constitutionality In The Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens The Equal Protection Rights Of American Muslims In Minneapolis-St. Paul,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Cve And Constitutionality In The Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens The Equal Protection Rights Of American Muslims In Minneapolis-St. Paul, Sarah Chaney Reichenbach
American University Law Review
In 2011, President Barack Obama announced a national strategy for countering violent extremism (CVE) to attempt to prevent the “radicalization” of potential violent extremists. The Obama Administration intended the strategy to employ a community-based approach, bringing together the government, law enforcement, and local communities for CVE efforts. Despite claiming to target extremism in all forms, government-funded CVE programs in the United States have almost exclusively focused on Islamic extremism. One pilot program focused on the Twin Cities in Minnesota—Minneapolis and St. Paul—home to the largest Somali community in the United States, most of whom are Muslim. The Trump Administration has …
Executive Power And The Aca,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
Executive Power And The Aca, Nicholas Bagley
Book Chapters
As with any law of its complexity and ambition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) vests in the sitting president broad implementation discretion. The law is not a blank check: in many ways both large and small, the ACA shapes and constrains the exercise of executive power. But Congress has neither the institutional resources nor the attention span to micromanage the rollout of a massive health program. It has no choice but to delegate.
Naturally, both President Obama and President Trump have drawn on their authority to tailor the ACA to their policy preferences. Neither president, however, has been able to …
Has President Trump Committed A War Crime By Pardoning War Criminals?, 35 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 757 (2020),
2020
UIC John Marshall Law School
Has President Trump Committed A War Crime By Pardoning War Criminals?, 35 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 757 (2020), Stuart Ford
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
New Environmental Crimes Project Data Shows That Pollution Prosecutions Plummeted During The First Two Years Of The Trump Administration,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
New Environmental Crimes Project Data Shows That Pollution Prosecutions Plummeted During The First Two Years Of The Trump Administration, David M. Uhlmann
Other Publications
The latest data from the Environmental Crimes Project at the University of Michigan Law School shows a dramatic drop in pollution prosecutions during the first two years under President Donald J. Trump. The data, which now includes 14 years of cases from 2005–2018, shows a 70 percent decrease in Clean Water Act prosecutions under President Trump, as well as a more than 50 percent decrease in Clean Air Act prosecutions. The data again shows that most defendants charged with pollution crime commit misconduct involving one or more of the aggravating factors identified in my previous scholarship, so prosecutors continue to …
Investments And Security: Balancing International Commerce And National Security With Expanded Authority For The Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States,
2020
Catholic University of America (Student)
Investments And Security: Balancing International Commerce And National Security With Expanded Authority For The Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States, Christopher Jusuf
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
What happens when the interests of international trade conflict with those of national security? This article analyzes this question within the context of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an obscure but increasingly powerful executive panel that exercises the president's broad authority to unilaterally interfere with and stop international mergers and acquisitions. With the passage of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA), CFIUS is more powerful now than it has ever been, and should be a key consideration for any company seeking to do business with foreign investors. This is especially true as America …
Judge, Jury, And Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing To Challenge An Executive Order That Prohibits Icts Transactions With Foreign Adversaries,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Judge, Jury, And Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing To Challenge An Executive Order That Prohibits Icts Transactions With Foreign Adversaries, Ari K. Bental
American University Law Review
On May 15, 2019, President Donald Trump, invoking his constitutional executive and statutory emergency powers, signed Executive Order 13,873, which prohibits U.S. persons from conducting information and communications technology and services (ICTS) transactions with foreign adversaries. Though the executive branch has refrained from publicly identifying countries or entities as foreign adversaries under the Executive Order, observers agree that the Executive Order’s main targets are China and telecommunications companies, namely Huawei, that threaten American national security and competitiveness in the race to provide the lion’s share of critical infrastructure to support the world’s growing 5G network.
Executive Order 13,873 raises several …
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Black Women And Girls And The Twenty-Sixth Amendment: Constitutional Connections, Activist Intersections, And The First Wave Youth Suffrage Movement,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Black Women And Girls And The Twenty-Sixth Amendment: Constitutional Connections, Activist Intersections, And The First Wave Youth Suffrage Movement, Mae C. Quinn
Seattle University Law Review
On this 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment—and on the cusp of the fiftieth anniversary of the Twenty-sixth Amendment—this article seeks to expand the voting rights canon. It complicates our understanding of voting rights history in the United States, adding layers to the history of federal constitutional enfranchisement and encouraging a more intersectional telling of our suffrage story in the days ahead.
Thus, this work not only seeks to acknowledge the Twenty-sixth Amendment as important constitutional content, as was the goal of the article I wrote with my law student colleagues for a conference held at the University of Akron …
The Major Questions Doctrine: How The Supreme Court’S Efforts To Rein In The Effects Of Chevron Have Failed To Meet Expectations,
2020
Candidate for J.D., Roger Williams University School of Law, 2020
The Major Questions Doctrine: How The Supreme Court’S Efforts To Rein In The Effects Of Chevron Have Failed To Meet Expectations, Andrew Howayeck
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Doe V. Mattis Open The Door To Citizen-Detainee Transfer?,
2020
Candidate for J.D., Roger Williams University School of Law, 2020
Does Doe V. Mattis Open The Door To Citizen-Detainee Transfer?, Amy Greer Ph.D.
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure,
2020
Claremont McKenna College
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure, Thomas D'Anieri
CMC Senior Theses
I have set out on the hunch that politics in America “feels different,” that we are frustrated both with our institutions as well as with one another. First, I will seek to empirically verify this claim beyond mere “feelings.” If it can be shown that these kinds of discontent genuinely exist to the extent that I believe they do, I will then explain why people feel this way and why things are different this time from the economic, political, and social points of view. Next, I will examine two potential responses, what I will call the populist and the institutional …
Against Executive-Controlled Administrative Law Judges,
2020
Yale University
Against Executive-Controlled Administrative Law Judges, Stephanie N. Higginson
Harvey M. Applebaum ’59 Award
No abstract provided.
Law, Race, And The Epistemology Of Ignorance,
2020
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Law, Race, And The Epistemology Of Ignorance, George A. Martinez
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Philosophers and other theorists have developed the field of epistemology which is the study of human knowledge. Critical race theorists have begun to explore how epistemological theory and insights may illuminate the study of race, including the analysis of race and the law. Such use of epistemology is appropriate because theoretical work on knowledge can be used to advance one of the key goals of critical race theory which is to understand how a regime of white supremacy and its subordination of people of color have been created and maintained in America. In this regard, philosophers and other theorists have …
Restoring Stare Decisis In The Wake Of Janus V. Afscme, Council 31,
2020
New York Law School
Restoring Stare Decisis In The Wake Of Janus V. Afscme, Council 31, James Tilghman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?, Suzette Malveaux
Publications
This Foreword is to the 27th Annual Ira C. Rothgerber Jr. Conference, National Injunctions: What Does the Future Hold?, which was hosted by The Byron R. White Center for the Study of American Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado Law School, on Apr. 5, 2019.
The Failed Transparency Regime For Executive Agreements: An Empirical And Normative Analysis,
2020
Duke Law School
The Failed Transparency Regime For Executive Agreements: An Empirical And Normative Analysis, Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Faculty Scholarship
The Constitution specifies only one process for making international agreements. Article II states that the President “shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” The treaty process has long been on a path to obsolescence, however, with fewer and fewer treaties being made in each presidential administration. Nevertheless, the United States has not stopped making international agreements. Even as Article II treaties have come to a near halt, the United States has concluded hundreds of binding international agreements each year. These agreements, known as …
The Constitutionality Of The Self-Pardon And Its Compatibility With Lockean Prerogative,
2020
New York Law School
The Constitutionality Of The Self-Pardon And Its Compatibility With Lockean Prerogative, Michael Kelley
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hargis V. Bevin,
2020
New York Law School
