Michigan,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Michigan, M. Vafa Barissi, Delainey Banks
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Maryland,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Maryland, Tia L. Churchfield
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Louisiana,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Louisiana, Jim Tartaglia
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Kentucky,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Kentucky, Kathleen R. Begley
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Kansas,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Kansas, Steven Rhodes, Sarah Trainer
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Illinois,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Illinois, Delainey Banks, Madison Pemberton
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Colorado,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Colorado, David R. Little, Diana S. Prulhiere
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Arkansas,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Arkansas, Andreah Riedel
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Alaska,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Alaska, Steven A. Rhodes, Zachary H. Barrett, Kizito Aidam
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Editor's Introduction & Front Pages,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Editor's Introduction & Front Pages, Alexandra Jury
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
The Economic Rhetoric Of Carbon Pricing,
2025
Brooklyn Law School
The Economic Rhetoric Of Carbon Pricing, Jeff Todd
Brooklyn Law Review
Economists overwhelmingly prefer the carbon pricing instruments of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade programs as the most cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gases and combat climate change. By contrast, US lawmakers have largely eschewed carbon pricing, and legal scholars have mixed views about implementing it. In order for legal scholars to better understand economic studies on carbon pricing and incorporate those studies into their own climate change scholarship, this Article turns to the rhetoric of economics. Economists view problems like climate change through the metaphor of the market, so they embrace carbon pricing because it is a market-based approach that corrects …
Infrastructure, Equity And Climate Change: The Promise Of The Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act (Iija),
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Infrastructure, Equity And Climate Change: The Promise Of The Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act (Iija), Dante R. Gurule
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Fixing The Last Frontier: How Law And Policy Governing Commercial Fishing Have Failed Alaska’S Environment And Economy,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Fixing The Last Frontier: How Law And Policy Governing Commercial Fishing Have Failed Alaska’S Environment And Economy, Andrew Ilemsky
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Overview Of Oil And Gas Activities In The Amazonian Territories,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Overview Of Oil And Gas Activities In The Amazonian Territories, Leonardo Costa Da Fonseca, Marcio Pina Marques
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
Editor's Introduction & Front Pages,
2025
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Editor's Introduction & Front Pages, Alexandra Jury
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal
No abstract provided.
The Climate-Arbitration Nexus: How Legitimate Expectations Shape Investor Claims In A Decarbonizing World,
2025
American University Washington College of Law
The Climate-Arbitration Nexus: How Legitimate Expectations Shape Investor Claims In A Decarbonizing World, M. Uzeyir Karabiyik
American University International Law Review
The global push for climate change mitigation, particularly through renewable energy promotion and fossil fuel phase-out, has sparked a surge in investor-state arbitrations. At the heart of these arbitrations lies the concept of “legitimate expectations,” which is considered by arbitral tribunals as a cornerstone of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. This Article conducts a comprehensive analysis of diverse approaches adopted by arbitral tribunals in interpreting legitimate expectations in the context of climate action. It then delves into specific interpretations of this concept within two categories: disputes related to states’ renewable energy promotion policies and those that stem from …
Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy, Gerald F. Davis
Seattle University Law Review
Our understanding of the American economy often relies on stylized facts derived from mandatory disclosures by listed corporations. Data vendors like Standard & Poor’s vacuum up 10Ks and proxy statements into databases, and scholars distill these into tentative maps. This may have been adequate for a postwar economy centered on asset-heavy manufacturers, but it is increasingly out of step with an information-based economy. Companies listed on the stock market are fewer in number and less representative than they were, light in tangible assets and people, and heavy on IP. Basic facts such as what industry they are in are increasingly …
Beyond Agency Authority: Regulating Sulfur Hexafluoride Under An Enhanced Title Ii Framework Of The Clean Air Act,
2025
Fordham Law School
Beyond Agency Authority: Regulating Sulfur Hexafluoride Under An Enhanced Title Ii Framework Of The Clean Air Act, Matthew Gawley
Fordham Environmental Law Review
This paper explores the critical need for robust Congressional action to regulate sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential more than 20,000 times greater than carbon dioxide. Recent Supreme Court decisions––in West Virginia v. EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo––to restrict EPA authority and end the Chevron doctrine have curtailed federal environmental agencies’ regulatory authority, shifting the responsibility for addressing major environmental challenges back to Congress. Despite being addressed under Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), current SF6 regulations prove grossly inadequate. The utilities industry––the largest …
Article Iii Standing For Cercla Private Cost Recovery Actions: How The Test's Strained Logic Belies Its Authority,
2025
Fordham Law School
Article Iii Standing For Cercla Private Cost Recovery Actions: How The Test's Strained Logic Belies Its Authority, Jonathan M. Palacios
Fordham Environmental Law Review
This Note examines how Article III standing doctrine applies to
private plaintiffs’ cost recovery actions under § 107(a)(4)(B) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act. A review of judicial decisions reveals inconsistencies
in the analysis of injury in fact and traceability, and suggests that
current Article III standing doctrine is misaligned with its purported
objectives. In response, this Note proposes a structured framework
for assessing injury in fact and a refined approach to analyzing
traceability that distinguishes between different forms of causal
uncertainty. These doctrinal adjustments should better align case
outcomes with Article III standing doctrine’s constitutional and …
Table Of Contents,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
