Natural Resources Law Commons^™

Corporate Agricultural Investment And The Right To Food: Addressing Disparate Protections And Promoting Rights-Consistent Outcomes, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Anna Bulman

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Over the past decade, the world has witnessed heightened corporate interest in large-scale land-based agricultural investment. While such investments can potentially have positive effects for local communities, they also can have wide-ranging negative impacts on human rights, including through forced displacement and the loss of livelihoods. This Article examines the impact of large-scale corporate agricultural investment on the right to food, as well as on human rights more generally. It considers the protections offered by the investment and human rights legal regimes to both corporations and individuals, including recent international developments relating to transnational corporate accountability and efforts to integrate …

Sustainable Development Goals: How Can The Mining Sector Contribute?, Lisa E. Sachs

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

In September 2015, the heads of 193 United Nations (UN) Member States adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be achieved by 2030. The agenda provides a successor framework to the Millennium Development Goals, which were adopted in 2000, with a view to ending poverty in all forms and dimensions, protecting the planet, and ensuring prosperity for all.

A Silver Lining? Impact Of Commodity Price Fall On Good Governance In Sierra Leone, Herbert M'Cleod, Nicolas Maennling, Lisa E. Sachs

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

From 2002 to 2013, resource-rich countries in Africa enjoyed the benefits of a commodity boom, using increased revenues to embark on major infrastructure projects in roads, rail, ports, and housing. But when commodity prices fell starting in 2011 (see figure below), public sector revenues took a major hit with private sector companies scaling back operations, delaying investment decisions and suspending unprofitable operations. Especially as the number and size of investments in the sector contracted, Governments felt increased pressure to collect, manage and spend those revenues more efficiently. As a result, the fall in commodity prices and mounting economic pressure actually …

Land Deals And The Law: Grievances, Human Rights, And Investor Protections, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Lise Johnson, Sam Szoke-Burke

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Land-based investments can create significant grievances for local individuals or communities, and host governments seeking to address those grievances must navigate a complicated landscape of legal obligations and pragmatic considerations. This briefing note, funded by UK aid from the Department for International Development, focuses on practical solutions for governments confronting grievances that arise from large-scale investments in agricultural or forestry projects. It accompanies a more in depth report on similar issues, entitled "Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human rights, and Investor Protections."

The briefing note considers such solutions in the context of governments’ legal obligations, particularly those imposed by international investment …

Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights, And Investor Protections, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Lise Johnson, Sam Szoke-Burke

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Land-based investments can create significant grievances for local individuals or communities, and host governments seeking to address those grievances must navigate a complicated landscape of legal obligations and pragmatic considerations. This report, funded by UK aid from the Department for International Development, focuses on practical solutions for governments confronting grievances that arise from large-scale investments in agricultural or forestry projects.

The report considers such solutions in the context of governments’ legal obligations, particularly those imposed by international investment law, international human rights law, and investor-state contracts. Understanding the implications of this diverse range of legal obligations is particularly important in …

Guide To Land Contracts: Agricultural Projects, International Senior Lawyers Project, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Sam Szoke-Burke

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Agricultural investment contracts can be complex, with complicated provisions that are difficult to understand. This Guide provides explanations for a range of common provisions, and includes a Glossary of legal and technical terms. It assists non-lawyers in better understanding agricultural investment contracts, such as those available on the Open Land Contracts repository.

The Guide was prepared by International Senior Lawyers Project staff and volunteers in collaboration with the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment.

Periodic Review In Natural Resource Contracts, Jacky Mandelbaum, Salli Anne Swartz, John Hauert

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

Periodic contract review mechanisms, which are provisions in contracts that formally require parties to meet at particular intervals to review the terms of the contract, are mechanisms that may facilitate the process of negotiating contractual changes to accommodate changing circumstances over the term of extractive industries contracts. Through the review of existing extractive industries agreements, this article considers how such review mechanisms have been incorporated into existing contracts and the use of such mechanisms as a tool for maintaining good relationships between the parties. In addition, the article suggests a new approach to the drafting of these mechanisms by negotiating …

Thawing Out: The Role Of The Arctic Council Service In A Melting Arctic, Taylor J. Enos

Pell Scholars and Senior Theses

With the changing natural and political climate of the Arctic, conflicts over resource extraction and navigation will become inevitable. Empowering an intergovernmental institution like the Arctic Council Service may be the only solution. This paper analyzes the importance and history of the Arctic as a political environment, which is prone to abuse in the very near future at the hands of Russia and the United States.

Appeal No. 0886: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0873: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0881: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0880: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0879: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0885: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0887: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0883: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0882: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0875: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0874: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)

Appeal No. 0878: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)