The Right Of Return: The Isis Bride,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
The Right Of Return: The Isis Bride, Casey Hare-Osifchin
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
Equal Prosecution For All: Violent Extremism At The Intersection Of Hate Crime And Terrorism,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
Equal Prosecution For All: Violent Extremism At The Intersection Of Hate Crime And Terrorism, Gabrielle Leeman
American University National Security Law Brief
After a white supremacist used his vehicle as a weapon to purposefully attack anti-racism protestors in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, federal officials called the incident domestic terrorism. The incident, in fact, met the definition of domestic terrorism. But the perpetrator was not prosecuted under any of the available terrorism statutes. The defendant was instead charged with, and later pled guilty to, committing hate crimes. It is imperative that we recognize all forms of terrorism as terrorism and use the legal system fairly to prosecute all terrorist attacks as terrorism. But the current terrorism statutory framework hinders the ability to prosecute …
The Capitol Riot, Racism And The Future Of American Democracy,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
The Capitol Riot, Racism And The Future Of American Democracy, Ryan T. Williams
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
Private Military Contractors: The Armed Forces Absent From The War Powers Resolution,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
Private Military Contractors: The Armed Forces Absent From The War Powers Resolution, Mckinney Voss Wheeler
American University National Security Law Brief
Private military contractors (PMCs) are increasingly ubiquitous in international conflicts, providing security, transport services, and even fighting alongside commissioned troops in battle. Yet for the United States, the ambiguity surrounding PMCs’ role in war presents a serious threat to the constitutional balance of war powers. The Founding Fathers deliberately divided those powers between the executive and legislative branches, aware of the dangers of concentrating them too heavily; and Congress further clarified protocol with the War Powers Resolution in 1973. But the War Powers Resolution, which requires the President to notify Congress when engaging "U.S. Armed Forces" in battle, omits any …
The Artemis Accords: Employing Space Diplomacy To De-Escalate A National Security Threat And Promote Space Commercialization,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
The Artemis Accords: Employing Space Diplomacy To De-Escalate A National Security Threat And Promote Space Commercialization, Elya A. Taichman
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
The Case For Presumptions Of Evil: How The E.O. 13873 'Trump' Card Could Secure American Networks From Third-Party Code Threats,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
The Case For Presumptions Of Evil: How The E.O. 13873 'Trump' Card Could Secure American Networks From Third-Party Code Threats, Caroline Elyse Burks
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
When Thoughts And Prayers Are Not Enough: Why Age-Based Restrictions On Purchasing Firearms Pass Constitutional Muster,
2021
American University Washington College of Law
When Thoughts And Prayers Are Not Enough: Why Age-Based Restrictions On Purchasing Firearms Pass Constitutional Muster, Madeline P. Fuller
American University Law Review
After the tragic shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that took the lives of seventeen students and staff members and injured countless others, the community debated how this event could have been prevented. There were security failures on the part of the school and police—unlocked doors, passive deputies and a security guard, and a broken PA system—all of which may have lessened the casualties had they been operating properly. However, these security measures might not have been tested and found lacking if another preventative measure had already taken place: prohibiting the young shooter from legally purchasing a weapon.
Florida …
National Security Decision-Making In The Age Of Technology: Delivering Outcomes On Time And On Target,
2021
American University, Washington College of Law
National Security Decision-Making In The Age Of Technology: Delivering Outcomes On Time And On Target, Gary Corn
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Guidance On Presidential Records By The National Archives And Records Administration,
2021
United States National Archives
Guidance On Presidential Records By The National Archives And Records Administration, David S. Ferriero
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
How the Presidential Records Act Affects the President, Vice President, and White House Staff During the Administration
Overview
The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents created on or received after January 20, 1981. The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public.
The PRA established a new statutory structure under which Presidents must manage their records. The Presidential Records Act:
Defines and states public ownership of the records;
Places the responsibility for the custody and …
Satellite Communications Law: The Nexus Of Space And Telecom Law,
2021
Lazarski University and University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Satellite Communications Law: The Nexus Of Space And Telecom Law, Frans Von Der Dunk
Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program: Faculty Publications
Given the complexity of satellite communications as a global business sector involving many private as well as public operators, many national and international regulators and a constantly evolving suite of services offered to an ever-increasing number of users and consumers, it should not come as a surprise that the legal environment—the sets of rules, rights, and obligations applicable to anyone operating in the field—is highly complex as well. This is already true even if merely focusing at the international level, where the myriad domestic regimes play varying roles—largely neglected in this particular article—in implementing, interpreting, refining, enforcing, or even changing …
Congressional Oversight Of Us Intelligence Activities,
2021
Georgetown University Law Center
Congressional Oversight Of Us Intelligence Activities, Mary B. Derosa
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This chapter examines the challenges, how they affect congressional oversight of intelligence, and Congress’s efforts to ensure accountability for United States (US) intelligence activities. The United States Government has engaged in intelligence collection and covert action since its earliest days. Congressional oversight of intelligence activities, however, has a relatively short history. It was not until the late 1940s, with the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), that the US House of Representatives and Senate created entities – subcommittees of their Armed Services committees – with responsibility for intelligence oversight. The Church Committee revelations and other concerns that surfaced during …
Sailor-Scholar: Remembering Rear Admiral Horace B. Robertson Jr., Jagc, U.S. Navy (Ret.),
2021
U.S. Naval War College
Sailor-Scholar: Remembering Rear Admiral Horace B. Robertson Jr., Jagc, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
International Law Studies
This volume is dedicated to the memory of
Rear Admiral Horace B. Robertson Jr.,
JAGC, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
November 13, 1923 – November 19, 2020
The Evolution And Jurisprudence Of The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court And Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Of Review,
2021
Georgetown University Law Center
The Evolution And Jurisprudence Of The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court And Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Of Review, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The past eight years have witnessed an explosion in the number of publicly-available opinions and orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. From only six opinions in the public domain 1978–2012, by early 2021, eighty-eight opinions had been released. The sharp departure is even more pronounced in relation to orders: from only one order declassified during 1978–2012, since 2013, 288 have been formally released. These documents highlight how the courts’s roles have evolved since 2004 and reveal four key areas that dominate the courts’ jurisprudence: its position as a specialized, Article III …
Trademarks As Surveillance Transparency,
2021
Georgetown University Law Center
Trademarks As Surveillance Transparency, Amanda Levendowski
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
We know very little about the technologies that watch us. From cell site simulators to predictive policing algorithms, the lack of transparency around surveillance technologies makes it difficult for the public to engage in meaningful oversight. Legal scholars have critiqued various corporate and law enforcement justifications for surveillance opacity, including contract and intellectual property law. But the public needs a free, public, and easily accessible source of information about corporate technologies that might be used to watch us. To date, the literature has overlooked a free, extensive, and easily accessible source of information about surveillance technologies hidden in plain sight: …
Questioning The Sacrosanct: How To Reduce Discrimination And Inefficiency In Veterans Preference Law,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Questioning The Sacrosanct: How To Reduce Discrimination And Inefficiency In Veterans Preference Law, Craig Westergard
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Red Scare Or Red Herring: How The “China Initiative” Strategy For Non-Traditional Collectors Is Stifling Innovation In The United States,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Red Scare Or Red Herring: How The “China Initiative” Strategy For Non-Traditional Collectors Is Stifling Innovation In The United States, Bianca Tillman
Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law
In 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice launched the “China Initiative” in response to the growing economic and national security threat posed by China. The China Initiative is a sweeping federal plan designed, in part, to protect the United States’ status as a leader in global innovation and scientific discourse. The U.S. is justified in its concern over China’s unfair practices to achieve military, technological, and economic prominence. While U.S. and Chinese intelligence agencies have spied on each other for decades, China has increased both the scope and the sophistication of its efforts to steal secrets from the U.S. in …
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law,
2020
Brooklyn Law School
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law, William Thomas Worster
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The international community lacks a form of territorial-based, international legal personality distinct from statehood, and yet, non-state, territorial entities of varying degrees of autonomy or independence need to function within the international community in some form. Some of these entities cannot be recognized as states because their creation violates jus cogens norms, though others are not recognized based on an assessment that they may not fully qualify as a state or that there are political reasons to refuse recognition. However, existing states still need to engage with these territorial quasi-states through the only paradigm the international community has—statehood. For example, …
Common Article 1 And The Duty To "Ensure Respect",
2020
University of Reading
Common Article 1 And The Duty To "Ensure Respect", Michael N. Schmitt, Sean Watts
International Law Studies
Common Article 1 to the four 1949 Geneva Conventions requires Parties to those instruments to “respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.” The provision is a corollary to the general international legal obligation of States to honor their treaty commitments, expressed classically in the maxim pacta sunt servanda.
Yet, academics and private organizations now use Common Article 1 as a vehicle to reimagine States’ enforcement obligations under the Geneva Conventions. Reinterpreting the article beyond its original meaning, they claim the article includes an “external” obligation—a duty on the part of all States to use …
Information Crossroads: Intersection Of Military And Civilian Interpretations Of Cyber Attack And Defense,
2020
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Information Crossroads: Intersection Of Military And Civilian Interpretations Of Cyber Attack And Defense, Carlos Plazas
The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On "Projecting Stability: A Deployable Nato Police Command",
2020
US Army War College
On "Projecting Stability: A Deployable Nato Police Command", Raymond E. Bell
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
