The Theoretical Constitutional Shape (And Shaping) Of American National Security Law,
2011
Valparaiso University School of Law
The Theoretical Constitutional Shape (And Shaping) Of American National Security Law, Robert F. Blomquist
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Unfortunate Advantage Of The Holyland People,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
The Unfortunate Advantage Of The Holyland People, Tomer Benito
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Strict Scruting—The Court's Deferrential Position On Material Support To Terrorism In Holder V. Humanitarian Law Project,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
No Strict Scruting—The Court's Deferrential Position On Material Support To Terrorism In Holder V. Humanitarian Law Project, Katherine R. Zerwas
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Richard Murphy
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Three Lessons The United Kingdom Can Teach The United States About Domestic Counterterrorism,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Three Lessons The United Kingdom Can Teach The United States About Domestic Counterterrorism, Steve Hewitt
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Uneasy Lies The Hand That Clicks The Mouse: Presidential Power And Wikileaks,
2011
Florida A&M University College of Law
Uneasy Lies The Hand That Clicks The Mouse: Presidential Power And Wikileaks, Andrew Pekoe
Florida A & M University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stuxnet As Cyberwarfare: Applying The Law Of War To The Virtual Battlefield, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2011),
2011
UIC School of Law
Stuxnet As Cyberwarfare: Applying The Law Of War To The Virtual Battlefield, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2011), John Richardson
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Preface To The Paperback Edition Of United States, International Law, And The Struggle Against Terrorism,
2011
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Preface To The Paperback Edition Of United States, International Law, And The Struggle Against Terrorism, Thomas Michael Mcdonnell
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
It is remarkable that in less than two years so many significant developments have taken place that concern the United States and the struggle against transnational terrorism. Perhaps the three most significant are as follows: (1) the Obama administration’s failure to reject wholesale the Bush-Cheney administration’s counterterrorism policies and practices; (2) the popular revolts sweeping the Arab world, often referred to as the “Arab spring”; and (3) the US Navy Seals killing Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
The Sec Staff's "Cybersecurity Disclosure" Guidance: Will It Help Investors Or Cyber-Thieves More?,
2011
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
The Sec Staff's "Cybersecurity Disclosure" Guidance: Will It Help Investors Or Cyber-Thieves More?, Sarah Jane Hughes, Roland L. Trope
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
A Unified Theory Of Detention, With Application To Preventive Detention For Suspected Terrorists,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
A Unified Theory Of Detention, With Application To Preventive Detention For Suspected Terrorists, Alec Walen
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Extraordinary Mrs. Shipley: How The United States Controlled International Travel Before The Age Of Terrorism,
2011
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
The Extraordinary Mrs. Shipley: How The United States Controlled International Travel Before The Age Of Terrorism, Jeffrey D. Kahn
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Terrorist watchlists used to restrict travel into and out of the United States owe their conceptual origins to Mrs. Ruth B. Shipley, the Chief of the State Department’s Passport Division from 1928 to 1955. Mrs. Shipley was one of the most powerful people in the federal government for almost thirty years, but she is virtually unknown today. She had the unreviewable discretion to determine who could leave the United States, for how long, and under what conditions.
This article examines how Mrs. Shipley exercised her power through a detailed study of original documents obtained from the National Archives. It then …
Measure Twice, Shoot Once: Higher Care For Cia-Targeted Killing,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Measure Twice, Shoot Once: Higher Care For Cia-Targeted Killing, Afsheen John Radsan, Richard Murphy
Faculty Scholarship
For almost a decade, the United States has deployed unmanned aerial vehicles, or "drones," to kill targeted members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes in Pakistan have, in particular, stirred strong debates over the legality of such actions. Some commentators insist that these strikes are legal under international humanitarian law (IHL) or as a matter of self-defense. Others insist that the United States' targeted killing amounts to murder.
It is critical for the law to determine how to control killer drones and the future of warfare. As technology evolves, drones will develop sharper senses …
Patent Office As Biosecurity Gatekeeper: Fostering Responsible Science And Building Public Trust In Diy Science, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 423 (2011),
2011
UIC School of Law
Patent Office As Biosecurity Gatekeeper: Fostering Responsible Science And Building Public Trust In Diy Science, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 423 (2011), Brian J. Gorman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
When the fields of intellectual property law and biotechnology intersect, most analysis is driven byeconomic and ethical issues. This article examines these factors, but in relation to the emerging security threat posed by biohackers, or do-it-yourself (“DIY”) scientists, who operate free from oversight and industry norms at the fringes of the biotechnology community. Public health risks are poised to grow as these citizen-scientists race for lucrative discoveries in the new frontier of syntheticbiology. This article proposes that the existing paradigm adjust accordingly to leverage regulatory compliance from the most ambitious biohackers looking to benefit from patent protection. The U.S. government …
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Michael W. Lewis
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Eric Jensen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert D. Sloane
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
