Korea's Truth And Reconciliation Commission: An Overview And Assessment,
2013
Sungkonghoe University
Korea's Truth And Reconciliation Commission: An Overview And Assessment, Kim Dong-Choon
Buffalo Human Rights Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implementing Truth And Reconciliation: Comparative Lessons For The Republic Of Korea,
2013
University at Buffalo School of Law
Implementing Truth And Reconciliation: Comparative Lessons For The Republic Of Korea, Tara J. Melish
Buffalo Human Rights Law Review
This Article substantively introduces a special symposium issue on "Implementing Truth and Reconciliation: Comparative Lessons for Korea." Inspired by the Dec. 2010 release of the official report and recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (TRCK), the special issue gathers comparative national and cross-national lessons from four nations -- South Korea, South Africa, Cambodia, and Peru -- on the factors that contribute to or hinder the effective implementation of truth commission recommendations and other efforts aimed at achieving national, community, and individual-level reconciliation. Such lessons are offered in the hope of assisting victim groups and other advocacy …
International Law And The Future Of Peace,
2013
University of Georgia School of Law
International Law And The Future Of Peace, Diane Marie Amann
Presentations and Speeches
These remarks, delivered at the April 4, 2013, luncheon of the American Society of International Law Women in International Law Interest Group, reflects on contributions of Jane Addams and other members of the early 20th C. peace movement as a means to explore law and practice related to the contemporary use of force and armed conflict.
Stare What: The Fourth Circuit's Questionable Holding In U.S. V. Hamilton,
2013
North Carolina Central University School of Law
Stare What: The Fourth Circuit's Questionable Holding In U.S. V. Hamilton, Alice K. Womack
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Political Question Doctrine In Private Military Company Liability Cases: Defining Claims To Ensure Accountability,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Political Question Doctrine In Private Military Company Liability Cases: Defining Claims To Ensure Accountability, Joelle D. Keypour
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note argues that the political question doctrine should be narrowly applied to private military companies (PMCs) to ensure accountability while preserving the separation of powers. It critiques the inconsistent application of the Baker v. Carr six-factor test in PMC cases, which often shields these entities from liability. The proposed solution is a dual classification system for claims—distinguishing between commercial-related and combat-related activities—to provide clarity and prevent abuse of the doctrine. This approach aims to balance judicial oversight with respect for executive authority in sensitive military matters.
A Time For Presidential Power? War Time And The Constrained Executive,
2013
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
A Time For Presidential Power? War Time And The Constrained Executive, David Levine
Michigan Law Review
Between 2002 and 2008 I served as an intelligence officer in the U.S. Air Force. Though I had been deployed overseas several times, my primary place of duty was in the United States. When I landed at Baghdad International Airport in June 2006, however, several things immediately changed for me as a result of military regulations. I had to carry my sidearm and dog tags at all times. I could not eat anywhere other than a U.S. military installation. I could not drink alcohol. My pay was a bit higher. Personally, I was more vigilant, more aware of my surroundings. …
Lessons Learned From Pakistan: A Dissertation On The Bush-Obama Drone Doctrine,
2013
SIT Study Abroad
Lessons Learned From Pakistan: A Dissertation On The Bush-Obama Drone Doctrine, Michael A. Pipa
Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection
The first use of the modern day attack drone by the United States was in Afghanistan in mid 2002, and for the past 11 years attack drones have been used by the United States in as many countries as Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. When considering the alternatives to using drones, such as sending marines on the ground to complete a mission or flying a piloted jet over enemy territory to gather intelligence, as well as the military power that the use of these vehicles projects, the attack drone has become the weapon of choice in the war on terror for …
Lessons From Improvements In Military And Overseas Voting,
2013
The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law
Lessons From Improvements In Military And Overseas Voting, Steven F. Huefner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Jus In Bello In Crisis?,
2013
Cornell Law School
Is Jus In Bello In Crisis?, Jens David Ohlin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
It is a truism that new technologies are remaking the tactical and legal landscape of armed conflict. While such statements are undoubtedly true, it is important to separate genuine trends from scholarly exaggeration. The following essay, an introduction to the Drone Wars symposium of the Journal, catalogues today’s most pressing disputes regarding international humanitarian law (IHL) and their consequences for criminal responsibility. These include: (i) the triggering and classification of armed conflicts with non-state actors; (ii) the relative scope of IHL and international human rights law in asymmetrical conflicts; (iii) the targeting of suspected terrorists under concept- or status-based classifications …
The Legality Of Armed Drone Strikes Against U.S. Citizens Within The United States,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
The Legality Of Armed Drone Strikes Against U.S. Citizens Within The United States, Marshall Thompson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?,
2013
Pepperdine University
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?, Gilbert L. Purcell, Janet Rappaport
Pepperdine Law Review
The Supreme Court in Rostker v. Goldberg upheld a Congressional decision which excluded women from registration for service in the Armed Forces of the United States. Although the case was brought based upon equal protection grounds, the majority took a separation of powers stance and based its decision upon the fact that the Court has traditionally granted deference to the decisions of Congress in the area of military affairs. The minority opinions disagreed with the majority's analysis and claimed that the central issue in Rostker was not military in nature, but was that Congress' plan to register males only, promoted …
The Constitution And National Security,
2013
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
The Constitution And National Security, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Review Of Eyal Benvenisti, The International Law Of Occupation (2d Ed., Oxford University Press 2012),
2013
Wayne State University
Review Of Eyal Benvenisti, The International Law Of Occupation (2d Ed., Oxford University Press 2012), Gregory H. Fox
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Utility Of Nuclear Weapons,
2013
US Army War College
Rethinking The Utility Of Nuclear Weapons, Ward Wilson
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
Drone Wars: Risks And Warnings,
2013
US Army War College
Drone Wars: Risks And Warnings, Alan W. Dowd
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
Drones: What Are They Good For?,
2013
US Army War College
Drones: What Are They Good For?, Jacquiline L. Hazelton
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
From The Editor,
2013
SSI
From The Editor, Antulio J. Echevarria Ii
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
Parameters Spring 2013,
2013
US Army War College
Parameters Spring 2013, Usawc Parameters
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
Drones Over Yemen: Weighing Military Benefits And Political Costs,
2013
US Army War College
Drones Over Yemen: Weighing Military Benefits And Political Costs, W. Andrew Terrill
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
Drones: Legitimacy And Anti-Americanism,
2013
US Army War College
Drones: Legitimacy And Anti-Americanism, Greg Kennedy
The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters
No abstract provided.
