Panel Iii: General Discussion,
2015
University of Georgia School of Law
Panel Iii: General Discussion, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The United States, The Oas, And The Dilemma Of The Undesirable Regime,
2015
University of Alabama
The United States, The Oas, And The Dilemma Of The Undesirable Regime, James P. Rowles
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Role Of The United Nations In Internal Conflict,
2015
United Nations Office of the Legal Counsel
Role Of The United Nations In Internal Conflict, Paul C. Szasz
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Enforcement: The Difference Between The Laws Of War And The Geneva Conventions,
2015
International Communications Agency
Enforcement: The Difference Between The Laws Of War And The Geneva Conventions, Richard L. Fruchterman Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Problems With The Application Of Norms Governing Interstate Armed Conflict To Non-International Armed Conflict,
2015
Washington College of Law
Problems With The Application Of Norms Governing Interstate Armed Conflict To Non-International Armed Conflict, Waldemar A. Solf
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Coping With Non-International Armed Conflicts: The Borderline Between National And International Law,
2015
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Coping With Non-International Armed Conflicts: The Borderline Between National And International Law, Bart De Schutter, Christine Van De Wyngaert
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Humanitarian Law And Internal Armed Conflicts,
2015
British Army
Humanitarian Law And Internal Armed Conflicts, G.I.A.D. Draper
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Panel Ii: Humanitarian Law: The Lincoln-Lieber Initiative,
2015
University of South Carolina
Introduction To Panel Ii: Humanitarian Law: The Lincoln-Lieber Initiative, George D. Haimbaugh Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Panel I--General Discussion,
2015
University of Georgia School of Law
Panel I--General Discussion, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Gradations Of Intervention In Internal Conflicts,
2015
University of Georgia School of Law
Gradations Of Intervention In Internal Conflicts, Louis B. Sohn
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Humanitarian Intervention: Help To Your Friends And State Practice,
2015
Rutgers Law School
Humanitarian Intervention: Help To Your Friends And State Practice, Roger S. Clark
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Practical Considerations For The Development Of Legal Standards For Intervention,
2015
Department of State
Practical Considerations For The Development Of Legal Standards For Intervention, Michael J. Matheson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Intervention In Internal Conflict: The Case Of Nicaragua,
2015
University of Georgia
Intervention In Internal Conflict: The Case Of Nicaragua, Lawrence A. Pezzullo
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Legal Standards For Intervention In Internal Conflicts,
2015
University of Virginia
Legal Standards For Intervention In Internal Conflicts, John N. Moore
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Introduction,
2015
George Washington University
Introduction, Bernard A. Ramundo
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Law Of War Developments Issue Introduction,
2015
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Law Of War Developments Issue Introduction, David Glazier
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Boundless War: Challenging The Notion Of A Global Armed Conflict Against Al-Qaeda And Its Affiliates,
2015
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
The Boundless War: Challenging The Notion Of A Global Armed Conflict Against Al-Qaeda And Its Affiliates, Andrew Beshai
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
The U.S. military response to the 9/11 attacks has expanded into a “global war” without a definite geographic scope. Both the Bush and Obama administrations have executed attacks in several countries including Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen under the “global war” paradigm. This Article challenges the concept of a global armed conflict, instead favoring the “epicenter-of-hostilities” framework for determining the legality of military action against Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and other terrorist groups. This approach, rooted in established international law, measures the existence of specific criteria in each nation where hostile forces are present to determine if an armed conflict in …
The Constitutionality Of Indefinite Detainment Of United States Citizens As Terrorist Suspects,
2015
Brigham Young University
The Constitutionality Of Indefinite Detainment Of United States Citizens As Terrorist Suspects, Spencer Kelly, Tiffany Erickson, Eric Backman
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review
No abstract provided.
Big Fish, Small Ponds: International Crimes In National Courts,
2015
Wake Forest University
Big Fish, Small Ponds: International Crimes In National Courts, Elizabeth B. Ludwin King
Indiana Law Journal
The principle of complementarity in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court anticipates that perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity will be tried in domestic courts unless there is no state with jurisdiction willing or able to do so. This Article examines the situation where a state might be willing to engage in meaningful local justice but temporarily lacks the capability to do so due to the effects of the conflict. It argues that where the state submits a detailed proposal to the International Criminal Court (ICC) outlining the steps necessary to gain or regain the …
Autonomous Weapons And Accountability: Seeking Solutions In The Law Of War,
2015
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Autonomous Weapons And Accountability: Seeking Solutions In The Law Of War, Kelly Cass
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Autonomous weapons are increasingly used by militaries around the world. Unlike conventional unmanned weapons such as drones, autonomous weapons involve a machine deciding whether to deploy lethal force. Yet, because a machine cannot have the requisite mental state to commit a war crime, the legal scrutiny falls onto the decision to deploy an autonomous weapon. This Article focuses on the dual questions arising from that decision: how to regulate autonomous weapon use and who should be held criminally liable for an autonomous weapon’s actions. Regarding the first issue, this Article concludes that regulations expressly limiting autonomous weapon use to non-human …
