Medical Jurisprudence Commons^™

When Everyone Is An Orphan: Against Adopting A Us-Styled Orphan Drug Policy In Canada, Matthew Herder

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Putting aside whether diseases that affect only small numbers of people ("rare diseases") should be prioritized over diseases that are otherwise orphaned, in this paper I argue that a new approach to rare, orphan diseases is needed. The current model, first signaled by the United States’ Orphan Drug Act and subsequently emulated by several other jurisdictions, relies on a set of open-ended criteria and market-based incentives in order to define and encourage drug therapies for rare, orphan diseases. Given a) the biopharmaceutical industries’ growing interest in orphan diseases, b) progress in the sphere of personalized medicines enabling more and more …

Clinicians May Not Administer Life-Sustaining Treatment Without Consent: Civil, Criminal, And Disciplinary Sanctions, Thaddeus Mason Pope

Faculty Scholarship

Both medical and legal commentators contend that there is little legal risk for administering life-sustaining treatment without consent. In this Article, I argue that this perception is inaccurate. First, it is based on an outdated data set, primarily damages cases from the 1990s. More recent plaintiffs have been comparatively more successful in establishing civil liability. Second, the published assessments focus on too-limited data set. Even if the reviewed cases were not outdated, a focus limited to civil liability would still be too narrow. Legal sanctions have also included licensure discipline and other administrative sanctions. In short, the legal risks of …

Forward Special Edition: “Innovations In Public Health Law: Exploring New Strategies”, Lawrence E. Singer

Faculty Publications & Other Works

No abstract provided.

Sheltering Psychiatric Patients From The Deshaney Storm: A Proposed Analysis For Determining Affirmative Duties To Voluntary Patients, Claire Marie Hagan

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Joshua’S Children: Constitutional Responsibility For Institutionalized Persons After Deshaney V. Winnebago County, Susan Stefan

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reforming The National Practitioner Data Bank To Promote Fair Med-Mal Outcomes, Gabriel H. Teninbaum

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

In 1990, the federal government created a clearinghouse to track, among other things, all medical malpractice payments made in the United States. Congress created this entity, the National Practitioner Data Bank, as a repository to hold information about individual doctors’ malpractice and disciplinary histories. Doctors’ NPDB files, while not visible to the public, are available to medical organizations and serve to aid them make better hiring decisions, as well as to prevent incompetent doctors from moving from state to state in the hope of escaping local regulators.

The NPDB’s existence, though, has become a significant barrier to malpractice claims settlement. …

Constitutional Uncertainty And The Design Of Social Insurance: Reflections On The Aca Case, Michael J. Graetz, Jerry L. Mashaw

Faculty Scholarship

The Health Care Case is best understood as a legal attack on the means but not the goals of the health care legislation. This emphasis on means rather than ends and on state over federal powers potentially poses significant risks for the complex institutional arrangements for social insurance that now exist and may imply harmful constraints on how Congress can restructure these programs to better meet the needs of the American people in the twenty-first-century economy. Not coincidentally, the new constitutional framework announced in the ACA decision favors those who want to dismantle rather than strengthen the nation’s social insurance …

The Missing Due Process Argument, Jamal Greene

Faculty Scholarship

The argument that eventually persuaded five members of the Supreme Court to conclude that the individual mandate exceeded Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce is one most observers originally considered frivolous. In that respect, it is similar to another potential argument against the mandate — that forcing someone to pay for insurance violates the liberty interests guaranteed by the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. The Commerce Clause argument was the centerpiece of the challenge to the mandate; the due process argument was not meaningfully advanced at all. This chapter suggests reasons why.

Somewhere To Go: Protecting Families Facing Mental Illness Through Healthcare Reform And The Medical-Legal Partnership Model, Amanda M. Walsh

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Coercion, Consent, Compassion, John D. King

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beinor V. Industrial Claims Appeals Office, Emma S. Blumer

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

A "Common" Proposal, Stacey A. Tovino

Faculty Articles

The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the "Common Rule") is codified in separate regulations by seventeen federal departments and agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS’s version of the Common Rule currently contains a basic policy for the protection of all human subjects, codified at Subpart A of the Common Rule, as well as special provisions governing human subjects research involving three sets of vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates (Subpart B); prisoners (Subpart C); and children (Subpart D). This Article proposes that HHS amend the Common Rule to add a …

Medical Adverse Events And Malpractice Litigation In Arizona: By-The-Numbers, Ashley M. Votruba, Michael J. Saks

Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications

A new medical malpractice "crisis" periodically erupts across the United States, invariably producing calls for legislative solutions. Typically, the public is told that rising malpractice insurance premiums are driving doctors out of their practices or out of our state, while increasing the cost of health care, and that those rising insurance rates are the product of too many unwarranted lawsuits resulting in exorbitant damage awards. The legislative fixes typically involve restricting the ability of plaintiffs to bring claims, to prosecute their claims successfully, or to recover full damages if they happen to prevail on their claims. The U.S. Congress sometimes …

What's Law Got To Do With It?: Why We Should Mediate, Rather Than Litigate, Cases Of Wrongful Life, Shawna Benston

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In light of the legal and societal disfavor toward wrongful life suits, this Note examines the cultural, (bio)ethical, legal, and philosophical background of the wrongful life tort. While the disability rights movement and the pro-life strains of the abortion debate hope to silence proponents of wrongful life suits, the evolution of a legal right to die underscores the importance of autonomy and privacy for the individual. Philosophical exploration of prospective children-including the nonidentity problem, claim-rights and corresponding duties, and the subjunctive-threshold notion of harmhelps explain the confusion and moral conundrum that pervade the very notion of "wrongful life" and that …

Preemption Under The Controlled Substances Act, Robert A. Mikos

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

States are conducting increasingly bold experiments with their marijuana laws, but questions linger over their authority to deviate from the federal Controlled Substances Act. The CSA bans marijuana outright, and commentators have assumed that Congress sought to preempt all state laws that might somehow conflict with the CSA. Under the preemption rule now in vogue, state marijuana reforms are preempted if they either require someone to violate the CSA or, more controversially, if they pose an obstacle to Congress’s objective of eradicating marijuana. Seeking to avoid such conflicts, government officials have scuttled a number of important state marijuana reforms. This …

Late Fathers' Later Children: Reconceiving The Limits Of Survivor's Benefits In Response To Death-Defying Reproductive Technology, Jeffrey W. Sheehan

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

When Congress instructed the Social Security Administration to begin paying a social insurance benefit to "widows and orphans" in the 1930s, it simplified the process of determining an applicant's relationship to an insured decedent in two significant ways: First, Congress ordered the agency to honor the intestate laws of each state when determining whether an applicant was actually the child of a decedent, and second, it ordered the agency to treat any child who could qualify as an intestate heir as if that child actually depended on the parent financially at the time of the parent's death. Three-quarters of a …

An Unlikely Feminist Icon?: Justice Harry A. Blackmun's Continuing Influence On Reproductive Rights Jurisprudence, Sarah Primrose

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article examines Justice Harry Blackmun's pivotal role in the landmark *Roe v. Wade* decision, which legalized abortion in the United States and significantly advanced women's reproductive rights. Despite his initial reluctance to take on the case, Blackmun's opinion established a woman's right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment, balancing this right against state interests. The decision has had profound and enduring implications for women's autonomy and equality, though it has also faced persistent challenges and critiques, including concerns about its constitutional basis and the arbitrariness of the trimester framework. The article highlights Blackmun's personal background and jurisprudential approach, emphasizing …

The Goldilocks Principle And Informed Consent In Joint-Spouse Representation, Madison Kaplan

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note explores the complexities of joint legal representation of spouses, emphasizing the need for balanced and clear informed consent. It highlights the challenges posed by conflicting legal guidelines and the necessity of detailed Joint Representation Agreements (JRAs) to navigate confidentiality and communication duties effectively.

Criminalization In Shades Of Color: Prosecuting Pregnant Drugaddicted Women, Carla-Michelle Adams

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that criminalizing pregnant women for drug use is both unconstitutional and ineffective. It contends that such prosecutions infringe upon fundamental rights, disproportionately affect minority women, and fail to address the root causes of addiction. The author advocates for a public health approach, emphasizing treatment over punishment to protect both the mother and the fetus.

Introduction: Under The Knife: Health Law, Health Care Reform, And Beyond, Stacey A. Tovino

Other Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.