Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medical Jurisprudence Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2,912 Full-Text Articles 2,901 Authors 2,474,220 Downloads 135 Institutions

All Articles in Medical Jurisprudence

Faceted Search

2,912 full-text articles. Page 39 of 71.

In The "Best Interests" Of The Disabled: Legislating Morality And The Power To Initiate Support Orders For Disabled Adults In Ohio, Kalynne Proctor 2017 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

In The "Best Interests" Of The Disabled: Legislating Morality And The Power To Initiate Support Orders For Disabled Adults In Ohio, Kalynne Proctor

Cleveland State Law Review

Today’s reality is that many families have children who are faced with disabling conditions that prevent them from relinquishing their dependency on others. Often, the need for specialized treatment and care does not terminate once a severely disabled child reaches adulthood. While typically parents are relieved of their legal parental obligations to their adult-aged children, this is not the same case for parents with severely disabled children. In some respects, Ohio has recognized the financial difficulties divorced parents face when they are the sole caregivers of disabled adult children. Although Ohio law requires that the noncustodial parent in a divorce …


Pre-Embryo Custody Battles: How Predisposition Contracts Could Be The Winning Solution, Ashley Alenick 2017 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Pre-Embryo Custody Battles: How Predisposition Contracts Could Be The Winning Solution, Ashley Alenick

Cardozo Law Review

The note examines the legal disputes arising from the disposition of frozen preembryos during divorce, highlighting the lack of consensus among U.S. courts in resolving such cases. It evaluates three legal approaches—constitutional analysis, contemporaneous agreement, and predisposition contracts—and argues that enforcing predisposition contracts, akin to prenuptial agreements, offers the most structured solution. However, the note emphasizes the need for procedural and substantive fairness in these contracts to ensure they are voluntary, fully disclosed, and do not unjustly prevent genetic parenthood.


Two-Stepping Around A Minor's Constitutional Right To Abortion, Wendy-Adele Humphrey 2017 Texas Tech University School of Law

Two-Stepping Around A Minor's Constitutional Right To Abortion, Wendy-Adele Humphrey

Cardozo Law Review

A woman's constitutional right to abortion was first generally established in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, and a female minor has the same right to abortion. In the majority of states, however, pregnant young women are required to either notify their parents or to get their parents' consent before obtaining a safe, legal abortion. These parental involvement laws do not infringe on a minor's constitutional right to abortion if a proper 'judicial bypass" proceeding is available. But in Texas, the recently amended judicial bypass law imposes additional extensive-possibly unconstitutional-restrictions on a pregnant minor who seeks a …


Retributive Medication: A Discussion Of A Maine Law Allowing Involuntary, Forcible Medication Of A Pretrial Defendant For The Purpose Of Rendering The Defendant Competent To Stand Trial, Ashley T. Perry 2017 University of Maine School of Law

Retributive Medication: A Discussion Of A Maine Law Allowing Involuntary, Forcible Medication Of A Pretrial Defendant For The Purpose Of Rendering The Defendant Competent To Stand Trial, Ashley T. Perry

Maine Law Review

Innocent until proven guilty—it’s a phrase we have all heard, know, and accept. But there are circumstances where this simple concept is strained in its application, such as when a legally incompetent defendant is facing trial. After all, how can a defendant be proven guilty if he cannot stand trial? The Supreme Court of the United States has determined that forcibly medicating an incompetent defendant solely to render the defendant competent to stand trial is permissible under the Federal Constitution. However, the Federal Constitution provides only the floor-level of civil rights; states are free to set their own ceilings. The …


Compulsory Medical Treatment Of Adults, Peter J. Riga 2017 St. John's University School of Law

Compulsory Medical Treatment Of Adults, Peter J. Riga

The Catholic Lawyer

No abstract provided.


The Home-Field Disadvantage: Tort Liability And Immunity For Paid Physicians During Disasters Within The Pacific Northwest Emergency Management Arrangement Member States, Stephen Seely 2017 Seattle University School of Law

The Home-Field Disadvantage: Tort Liability And Immunity For Paid Physicians During Disasters Within The Pacific Northwest Emergency Management Arrangement Member States, Stephen Seely

Seattle University Law Review

This Note identifies how the Pacific Northwest Emergency Management Arrangement member states of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington apply tort liability and immunity to medical professionals during times of disaster. This Note also identifies an example statutory scheme that, if enacted, will provide equal protection to all physicians who provide care to disaster victims, regardless of their local or out-of-state status.


Rebranding Death, Angela Wentz Faulconer 2017 Brigham Young University Law School

Rebranding Death, Angela Wentz Faulconer

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


The Constitutionality Of Laws Banning Physician Assisted Suicide, Richard S. Myers 2017 Brigham Young University Law School

The Constitutionality Of Laws Banning Physician Assisted Suicide, Richard S. Myers

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


Legalization Of Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia: Foundational Issues And Implications, Sean Murphy 2017 Brigham Young University Law School

Legalization Of Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia: Foundational Issues And Implications, Sean Murphy

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


Religion In The Time Of Measles: Prescriptions For Minimizing The Public Health Threats Associated With Religious Exemptions From Mandatory Vaccinations, Victor Diego Gonzalez 2017 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Religion In The Time Of Measles: Prescriptions For Minimizing The Public Health Threats Associated With Religious Exemptions From Mandatory Vaccinations, Victor Diego Gonzalez

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note examines the legal and public health tensions surrounding childhood vaccination mandates, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and societal interests. It argues that while states have the authority to compel vaccinations under their police powers, the proliferation of nonmedical exemptions, particularly philosophical ones, undermines herd immunity and public health. The analysis advocates for stricter criteria for religious exemptions and educational measures to address vaccine hesitancy, while cautioning against eliminating religious exemptions entirely to avoid public backlash.


Informed Consent And Privacy Of Non-Identified Bio-Specimens And Estimated Data: Lessons From Iceland And The United States In An Era 1251 Of Computational Genomics, Donna M. Gitter 2017 Zicklin School of Business

Informed Consent And Privacy Of Non-Identified Bio-Specimens And Estimated Data: Lessons From Iceland And The United States In An Era 1251 Of Computational Genomics, Donna M. Gitter

Cardozo Law Review

This Article analyzes issues of informed consent and patient autonomy raised by advances in bioinformatics and computational genomics. The Article describes the increasing use in biomedical research of estimated data. Researchers are able to use genetic and genealogical data from research subjects, who did agree to participate in genetic testing, in order to make educated guesses about the genetic profiles of their relatives who did not volunteer to participate. This estimated data can then be combined with health records of the non-volunteers in order to conduct computational genetic research, often termed "in silico" biology, without their informed consent. The Article …


Conviction Integrity Units Revisited, Barry Scheck 2017 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Conviction Integrity Units Revisited, Barry Scheck

Articles

“Conviction Integrity Unit” has become a brand name that has good public relations value for an elected official. But what does it really mean? Is it just a fashion accessory, a flashy but empty appellation intended to convey the idea that the office is extremely serious about correcting wrongful convictions and holding its own members accountable for errors or acts of misconduct, but really is not? Is conviction integrity nothing more than a passing fad, a nebulous slogan without real meaning that is good for propaganda purposes, but will not bring about any serious change in the way business is …


The Trouble With The Curve: Manufacturer And Surgeon Liability For “Learning Curves” Associated With Unreliably-Screened Implantable Medical Devices, Frank Griffin 2017 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

The Trouble With The Curve: Manufacturer And Surgeon Liability For “Learning Curves” Associated With Unreliably-Screened Implantable Medical Devices, Frank Griffin

Arkansas Law Review

Implantable medical devices have a considerable effect on the health and finances of Americans. The rate of success of the implantation of the medical device depends upon device design and physician experience. New devices are often associated with an increased rate of complications during the first few years the device is on the market as doctors learn how to better implant the device and as device companies make modifications to the device. This phenomenon is known as the “learning curve”.

During the learning curve period, the complication rate for the new device is often higher than for the established device …


The Time Of Death - A Legal, Ethical And Medical Dilemma, John E. Pearson 2017 St. John's University School of Law

The Time Of Death - A Legal, Ethical And Medical Dilemma, John E. Pearson

The Catholic Lawyer

No abstract provided.


Trial And Error: Legislating Adr For Medical Malpractice Reform, Lydia Nussbaum 2017 University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Trial And Error: Legislating Adr For Medical Malpractice Reform, Lydia Nussbaum

Maryland Law Review

The U.S. healthcare system has a problem: hundreds of thousands of people die each year, and over a million are injured, by medical mistakes that could have been avoided. Furthermore, over ninety percent of these patients and their families never learn of the errors or receive redress. This problem persists, despite myriad reforms to the medical malpractice system, because of lawmakers’ dominant focus on reducing providers’ liability insurance costs. Reform objectives are beginning to change, however, and the vehicle for implementing these changes is alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”). Historically, legislatures deployed ADR to curb malpractice litigation and restrict patients’ access …


A Healthy Amount Of Privacy: Quantifying Privacy Concerns In Medicine, Ignacio N. Cofone 2017 Yale Law School

A Healthy Amount Of Privacy: Quantifying Privacy Concerns In Medicine, Ignacio N. Cofone

Cleveland State Law Review

With recent developments in e-health, concerns have been raised regarding the privacy of patients who are monitored with such treatments. I propose a simple method to incorporate these concerns into a standard health impact evaluation, based on quality-adjusted life years and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. This method provides a way to objectively value privacy concerns and balance them with health benefits. Hence, it can guide doctors and policymakers into incorporating privacy considerations and making better choices regarding e-health programs. This method can also be tested on existing economic evaluations to compare outcomes and gauge the extent to which privacy issues …


Short Fall Arguments In Court: A Probabilistic Analysis, Maria Cuellar 2017 Carnegie Mellon University

Short Fall Arguments In Court: A Probabilistic Analysis, Maria Cuellar

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

A discussion about how statistical arguments are used in court, specifically in cases of Abusive Head Trauma in which the defendant has claimed that an accidental short fall, and not shaking or child abuse, has caused the child’s injuries.


Bias, Subjectivity, And Wrongful Conviction, Katherine Judson 2017 University of Wisconsin Law School

Bias, Subjectivity, And Wrongful Conviction, Katherine Judson

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

A talk about bias, subjectivity and wrongful convictions.


Bioprospecting Legislation In The United States: What We Are Doing, What We Are Not Doing, And What Should We Do Next, Emily J. Stolfer 2017 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Bioprospecting Legislation In The United States: What We Are Doing, What We Are Not Doing, And What Should We Do Next, Emily J. Stolfer

Cleveland State Law Review

Bioprospecting is a growing worldwide effort to protect knowledge and the environment. With its potential economic benefit and technological advancements, bioprospecting will continue to grow as the world advances. Other nations have begun to protect the information available and continue to develop legislation. However, the United States has been hesitant to ratify international treaties or implement its own legislation. This Note examines both domestic and international efforts to protect both indigenous people and the environment. It analyzes the legislation the United States currently has in place but also examines where the United States is lacking. Regarding the United States’ failure …


Police Interrogations, False Confessions, And Alleged Child Abuse Cases, Richard Leo 2017 University of San Francisco

Police Interrogations, False Confessions, And Alleged Child Abuse Cases, Richard Leo

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

A discussion on false confession cases in the United States.


Digital Commons powered by bepress