Medical Jurisprudence Commons^™

Digital Health Passes In The Age Of Covid-19: Are “Vaccine Passports” Lawful And Ethical?, Lawrence O. Gostin, I. Glenn Cohen, Jana Shaw

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

As COVID-19 vaccination rates in high-income countries increase, governments are proposing or implementing digital health passes (DHPs) (vaccine “passports” or “certificates”). Israel uses a “green pass” smartphone application permitting vaccinated individuals’ access to public venues (eg, gyms, hotels, entertainment). The European Union plans a “Digital Green Certificate” enabling free travel within the bloc (see eTable in the Supplement). New York is piloting an IBM “Excelsior Pass,” confirming vaccination or negative SARS-CoV-2 test status through confidential data transfers to fast-track business reopenings. This paper examines the benefits of DHPs, scientific challenges, and whether they are lawful and ethical.

Abortion Delayed Is Abortion Denied: Why The Hyde Amendment's Rescission Of Federal Funding For Medically Necessary Abortions Harms Low-Income Women, Aliza Shatzman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that the Hyde Amendment, which restricts federal funding for abortions except in cases of life endangerment, rape, or incest, violates the constitutional rights established by Roe v. Wade. It contends that the amendment disproportionately harms low-income women by denying them access to medically necessary abortions, thereby undermining their health and autonomy. The author asserts that the Hyde Amendment conflicts with the "reliance interest" doctrine outlined in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where women have come to depend on the availability of abortion services.

Feres: The “Double-Edged Sword”, Kaitlan Price

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court barred service members from suing the Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act if the injuries occurred “incident to military service.” In establishing this doctrine, the Court discussed the necessity of protecting the military from lawsuits to ensure effective decision-making by military leaders.

Scholars have harshly criticized Feres in the modern era, arguing Feres must be overturned to provide service members with a greater opportunity for recovery. Specifically, many scholars admonish Feres because the Supreme Court failed to provide a clear definition of “incident to military service.” Lacking a clear definition …

When Justice Should Precede Generosity: The Case Against Charitable Immunity In Arkansas, Courtney Jane Baltz

Arkansas Law Notes

This Comment discusses various aspects of the modern hospital and examines charitable immunity’s incompatibility with modern law.

First, Part II explains the historical justifications for immunity and presents the doctrine’s landscape in the United States. Part III examines the role precedent plays in continuing to adhere to the rule of immunity. Part IV takes an in-depth approach of the big business of hospitals by evaluating various financial aspects of charitable hospitals. Part V explores the reality of charitable immunity falling out of touch with concepts of modern law. Part VI takes a more specific look at the application of the …

Provisions On The Concealment Of Esthetic Imperfections, Through Therapeutic Or Cosmetic Interventions, From The Fiancé: Islamic Jurisdictive Study From A Medical Perspective, Asma Salmeen Al-Aryani, Nihal Abdullah Ahmed

UAEU Law Journal

The aim of this research is to explain the provisions of jurisprudence of hiding some unapparent defects or imperfections by the fiancée from her future husband through either therapeutic or cosmetic procedures.

The treatment may be a cure of a congenital disease that may affect the marriage, offspring or both, or it may not affect any of them. Treatment may also be the cure of an imbalance that affects the human and caused by himself or others. This imbalance may have impact on marital life, offspring, both of them or it may not have an effect on either of them. …

Applying The Health Justice Framework To Address Health And Health Care Inequities Experienced By People With Disabilities During And After Covid-19, Robyn M. Powell

Washington Law Review

The COVID-19 pandemic has been especially devastating for people with disabilities, as well as other socially marginalized communities. Indeed, an emerging body of scholarship has revealed that people with disabilities are experiencing striking disparities. In particular, scholars have shined a light on state and hospital triage policies that allow hospitals to ration critical health care and resources, such as ventilators, for people with disabilities if resources become limited and they cannot treat all patients during the pandemic. These injustices deserve extensive consideration from policymakers, legal professionals, and scholars.

Elucidating how the inequities that people with disabilities experience during the COVID-19 …

Perspective Of Islamic Law (Sharia) Towards The Liability Of Medical Malpractice, Mohammed Abdul Rahim Al Olama

UAEU Law Journal

In this brief study, I have addressed the view of Islamic Law (Sharia) towards liability in medical malpractice. I have cited the views of early scholars from the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence as well as contemporary ones and quoted decisions issued by the jurisprudential academies in reference to this important subject. Moreover, the study sheds light on the position of Sharia especially with the introduction of multidisciplinary modern medicine treatments and the increased likelihood of consequent medical malpractice.

It is noteworthy that the doctor's commitment to the rules and principles of the medical profession without negligence absolves him/her of …

Utilitarian Triage In Disasters, Alyssa Nielsen

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right To Conscience Vs. The Right To Die: Physician-Assisted Suicide, Catholic Hospitals, And The Rising Threat To Institutional Free Exercise In Healthcare, Zachary R. Carstens

Pepperdine Law Review

An imminent conflict is developing between religious healthcare institutions opposed to physician-assisted death (PAD) and their healthcare employees who wish to offer PAD to their patients. When these interests clash, institutional conscience claims must prevail over doctors’ desires and patients’ demands. This article catalogues the incomplete patchwork of conscience protections guaranteed to American healthcare workers and institutions, as well as the swiftly accelerating wave of PAD legalization sweeping the states. The article documents the tactical vocabulary—deployed with nearly identical language in every state PAD statute—that conspicuously anticipates con-science objections from the massive, and staunchly anti-PAD, Catholic healthcare system. Notably, in …

California V. Texas: The Role Of Congressional Procedure In Severability Doctrine, Mary Leto Pareja

Faculty Scholarship

The United States Supreme Court is once again considering a case that challenges the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). In this round of litigation, plaintiffs argue that because Congress lowered the individual mandate tax penalty to zero in the 2017 Tax Act that makes the individual mandate itself unconstitutional and that, furthermore, the individual mandate cannot be severed from the rest of the ACA. The District Court agreed with the plaintiffs and struck down the entire ACA, and the Supreme Court granted cert to hear this momentous question. A decision is expected by summer of 2021.

The ACA …

The Legal Provisions Of The Dna In Light Of Seeking To Ensure Effectiveness In The Determination Of Descent, Bassim Chihab

UAEU Law Journal

The discovery of DNA was a turning point in the legal evidence system, With the pursuit of individuals and States to access the facts and to the inability of traditional evidence to meet the need, Both the legislation and the judiciary have moved towards DNA, as an amazing scientific discovery that provides precise answers to vague questions.

As is the case, developed countries have been credited with discovering and prioritizing DNA, In the Arab countries, and specifically in matters of personal status, there is a keen concern not to harm the family rights system, because they are constants, but on …

Kidney, Money, And The Shī‘Ah Implementation Of The Rule Of Necessity, Zahra Takhshid

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

In the U.S., over 43,000 people die every year waiting for a kidney. In Iran, however, monetary incentives have eliminated such a waitlist. Iran is the only country in the world with an unrelated living kidney donor program that has allowed for monetary incentives in the form of an altruistic gift, which has become known as “the Iranian Model.” Nevertheless, the legal details of the system remain vague and scholars both in and outside of Iran continue to debate the nature of the system. Does the Iranian system consider kidneys a commodity? Can you legally buy a kidney in Iran? …

Envisioning The Ftc As A Facilitator Of Blockchain Technology Adoption In The Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Industry, Noah Spector

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Seemingly overnight, the kingpins of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) industry shifted their focus from exploring their customers’ DNA to commodifying it. Companies like Ancestry or 23andMe that were once exclusively known as mere sources of “infotainment” now regularly sell consenting customers’ genetic data to pharmaceutical researchers or use it to develop drugs of their own. To gain these customers’ consent, both firms employ a series of long, complex clickwrap contracts that largely fail to apprise their readers of the potential risks of sharing their genetic data. Nor do these agreements provide any form of compensation to those consumers whose …

Off-Label Use In The Twenty-First Century: Most Myths And Misconceptions Mitigated, 54 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2021), James Beck

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Reliability Of Statements Made For Medical Diagnosis Or Treatment: A Medical – Legal Analysis Of A Hearsay Exception, 54 Uic L. Rev. 679 (2021), Marc Ginsberg

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Social Justice As A Necessary Guide To Public Health Disaster Response, Stephen S. Hanson

Journal of Health Care Law and Policy

No abstract provided.

"As Long As I'M Me": From Personhood To Personal Identity In Dementia And Decision-Making, James Toomey

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

As people, especially older people, begin to develop dementia, we confront ethical questions about when and how to intervene in their increasingly compromised decision-making. The prevailing approach in philosophically-inclined bioethics to tackling this challenge has been to develop theories of “decision-making capacity” based on the same characteristics that entitle the decisions of moral persons to respect in general. This Article argues that this way of thinking about the problem has missed the point. Because the disposition of property is an identity-dependent right, what matters in dementia and decision-making is an individual’s personal identity with their prior self, not their moral …

Health Ai For Good Rather Than Evil? The Need For A New Regulatory Framework For Ai-Based Medical Devices, Sara Gerke

Faculty Scholarly Works

Artificial intelligence (AI), especially its subset machine learning, has tremendous potential to improve health care. However, health AI also raises new regulatory challenges. In this Article, I argue that there is a need for a new regulatory framework for AI-based medical devices in the U.S. that ensures that such devices are reasonably safe and effective when placed on the market and will remain so throughout their life cycle. I advocate for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and congressional actions. I focus on how the FDA could - with additional statutory authority - regulate AI-based medical devices. I show that …

Big Pharma, Big Problems: Covid-19 Heightens Patent-Antitrust Tension Caused By Reverse Payments, Hannah M. Lasting

Seattle University Law Review

In the wake of COVID-19, pharmaceutical companies rushed to produce vaccinations and continue to work on developing treatments, while the tension caused by reverse payments intensifies between patent and antitrust law. Lawmakers must address this tension, and the current pandemic should serve as a catalyst to prompt reform at the legislative level. By amending the Hatch-Waxman Act, lawmakers can ease the increasing strain between patent and antitrust policy concerns. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court attempted to resolve this tension in its landmark decision, F.T.C. v. Actavis, but the tension remains as lower courts struggle to produce a uniform standard …

Factors Affecting Access To Administrative Health Data For Research In Canada: A Study Protocol, Cynthia Kendell, Adrian Levy, Geoff Porter, Elaine Gibson, Robin Urquhart

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

In Canada, most provinces have established administrative health data repositories to facilitate access to these data for research. Anecdotally, researchers have described delays and substantial inter-provincial variations in the timeliness of data access approvals and receipt of data. Currently, the reasons for these delays and variations in timeliness are not well understood. This paper provides a study protocol for (1) identifying the factors affecting access to administrative health data for research within select Canadian provinces, and (2) comparing factors across provinces to assess whether and how they contribute to inter-provincial variations in access to administrative health data for research.