Litigation Commons^™

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Civil Rights Law—One Foot In, One Foot Out: Fourth Circuit Holds Tester’S Informational Injury Obtains Sufficient Standing—Laufer V. Naranda Hotels, Llc, 60 F.4th 156 (4th Cir. 2023), Abigail Walsh

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Prepared For What? Oregon Officials Granted Immunity After Failing To Prioritize Inmates In Covid-19 Vaccines—Maney V. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296 (9th Cir. 2024), Emily Riccio

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Green Dividends: A Case Study In Green Dividends And The Conditions For Private Ordering Solutions, Anne M. Tucker

Seattle University Law Review

This Essay introduces a novel private ordering solution to facilitate corporate investments in pro-social and environmental initiatives: Green dividends. Green dividends are an optional increase in shareholder dividends that are returned to the company to be reinvested in environmental initiatives or kept by a shareholder.

Green dividends pose an alternative to the current gridlocked debate that corporations can’t, won’t, shouldn’t, and shouldn’t even try to act in pro-social or environmental ways. Turning the common refrains on their head converts each narrative into an element for a successful private ordering solution: authority, accountability, shareholder buy-in, and government- backed enforcement. With Green …

Does Climate Disclosure Work To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Emerging Evidence Suggests Cautious Optimism, Cynthia A. Williams

Seattle University Law Review

Significant regulatory resources have been spent developing global, voluntary climate and sustainability disclosure standards, such as the TCFD, TNRD, and ISSB’s Sustainability and Climate Disclosure standards, or domestically required disclosures, such as in the EU and in the U.S. Thus, it is important to evaluate whether this disclosure, particularly voluntary, qualitative disclosure, will have the power to shift the allocation of capital, will have a significant effect on the management of climate risk within firms, and ultimately will reduce climate change risk and biodiversity loss.

In this Article, several interrelated questions will be discussed. First, what does the empirical evidence …

Redefining The Relevant Market: Abandonment Or Return To Brown Shoe, Daniel A. Hanley

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

Defining a relevant market is arguably the most important requirement in antitrust litigation. Between the 1890s and the 1940s, defining a relevant market was a simple and generalized process, typically undertaken by courts as a cursory matter. However, in the 1960s, defining relevant markets became a centerpiece of antitrust litigation. The modern method originates from the Supreme Court’s landmark 1962 decision in Brown Shoe v. United States. The method commonly known as the Brown Shoe test requires judges to construct relevant markets by carefully analyzing accessible and understandable qualitative data, such as internal corporate documents and consumer surveys. Since the …

Crip The Law: Representation As A Key Component Of Liberation Lawyering, Marissa Ditkowsky

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

No abstract provided.

Do Federal Circuit Courts Of Appeal Provide Adequate Assistance To Self-Represented Litigants? A Review Of The Circuits’ Websites Resources, Jona Goldschmidt

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

No abstract provided.

Climate Litigation And Third-Party Litigation Finance, Courtney Geiss

Indiana Law Journal

For the last 200 years, human activities have been the main driver of global climate change, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. Increased emissions from fossil fuels have contributed to rising temperatures, food scarcity, and natural disasters, including fires, flooding, and droughts. Although climate change has been an issue in the public eye for the last several decades, global emissions are projected to continue increasing. At this point, it is clear that current actions at the individual and state level are not enough to meaningfully reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this Note, I will discuss the idea of using third-party …

Table Of Contents, Jtaa Editors

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Securities Law—Beware The Shadows—District Court Broadens Federal Insider Trading Laws To Include “Shadow Trading”—Sec V. Panuwat, No. 21-Cv-06322-Who, 2024 Wl 4602708 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2024), Trevor Pilkington

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Let's Break Some Rules: Immodest Proposals For Evidence Reform, Len Niehoff

Articles

In 1975, when the American Bar Association launched LITIGATION, its editors dedicated the entirety of one of the journal's first issues to evidence. Authors included distinguished practitioners, respected judges, and academic giants like Margaret A. Berger, Irving Younger, and Jim McElhaney. Subjects varied, but the articles shared a common sensibility: The recently adopted Federal Rules of Evidence were a good thing.

Understanding Federal Rule Of Evidence 104(B) On Building Walls And Missing Bricks, Len Niehoff, Shannon Hickey

Articles

We use individual pieces of evidence to construct our cases, recognizing that no one of them, taken in isolation, suffices to get the job done. As Professor McCormick famously said of evidence, “a brick is not a wall.” Federal Rule of Evidence 104(b) explains the logical relationship between those various pieces of evidence and how they help us build our proofs. Or perhaps we should say that the rule tries to explain it, without much success.

In Re Firstenergy Corp. Securities Litigation: Where Macquarie Meets Affiliated Ute, Elizabeth Cosenza, Amanda M. Payne

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

The central question this Article seeks to address is whether there is any world in which the Affiliated Ute presumption can still apply to cases under Rule 10b-5(b) after the Supreme Court’s decision in Macquarie? Put differently, if only half-truths and affirmative misrepresentations remain actionable under Rule 10b-5(b), is the Basic presumption the only pathway left for securities plaintiffs? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit will likely be the first court to address this issue in In re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation. The case will test the availability of the Affiliated Ute presumption post-Macquarie in cases based …

How To Evaluate Non-Majority Control: What History And Statutes Tell Us, J. Travis Laster

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Under American law, a person who controls a corporation is a fiduciary. Since the nineteenth century, American law has treated a person who wields a majority of the voting power as having control. For almost as long, American law has recognized that holding a majority of the voting power is sufficient but not necessary for control. During the past two decades in Delaware, two schools of thought co-existed regarding non-majority control. One school took a formal approach that (i) shifted from examining control over the business affairs of the enterprise to control over the board, (ii) discounted sources of influence …

The Political Commitment Of The Supreme Court Of Texas To Protecting Controlling Equity Owners, Val Ricks

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

The Supreme Court of Texas has revealed a political commitment to protecting controlling equity owners—e.g., shareholders, LLC members, limited partners—from liability related to their equity ownership. The Court does not say this, of course. The commitment the Court intends to reveal is a legal one. The political commitment must be teased out of what the Court does. The purpose of this article is to tease. Its method is to examine how the Supreme Court of Texas, in cases involving controlling or significant equity owners, extends the reasoning of its opinions out beyond law, and sometimes in conflict with it. When …

Reviving Shareholder Voice By Redefining Pre-Suit Demand, Wendy Gerwick Couture

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

This Article diagnoses, and seeks to cure, an undertheorized dynamic relationship between two levers of shareholder influence in the modern public corporation: suit and voice. This Article demonstrates that, under current Delaware law, a shareholder must stifle its voice in order to retain the ability to pursue a viable derivative claim, thus inhibiting the shareholder’s monitoring and information-sharing roles. In particular, the onerous “demand made” litigation pathway disincentivizes pre-suit demand, and the expansive definition of pre-suit demand captures shareholder communications to the board seeking corrective action other than litigation. To avoid this collision between suit and voice, this Article proposes …

The Intended And Resulting Interpretations Of Article 9 Considering The Rise Of Textualism, Cat Gassiot

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

This Article is the first to examine the interpretive choices of judges for Article 9 of the UCC. Textualism has become one of the predominant methods of interpretation for courts across the state and federal systems in the United States. While there is a great deal of academic work on what this means for traditional statutes, there is limited discussion of the interpretive effects of textualism on the UCC, much less Article 9, which governs secured transactions. The continuity and uniformity of secured transactions jurisprudence is fundamental as it underlies bankruptcy proceedings, debt and credit financing, and commercial transactions more …

Confronting The Duty To Capitalize In Veil-Piercing, Douglas C. Michael

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In corporate law, the doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil” allows courts to hold shareholders personally liable for corporate obligations. The doctrine—which now also applies to entities other than corporations—has been widely criticized as imprecise and unworkable. I respond to that criticism in the area of veil-piercing law which remains most intractable—the case of the tort victim who remains unsatisfied after exhausting corporate assets. Although most commentators have eschewed talk of any duty owed by the business owner to vest the business with sufficient assets, I argue that courts and legislatures should recognize—confront—such a duty. I look to negligence law …

Unto The (Data) Breach, Charlotte A. Tschider

Faculty Publications & Other Works

Since the early 2000s, U.S. courts have begun hearing “data breach” liability cases, the inevitable result of a growing internet-connected technology infrastructure. The relatively recent development of case law signals a body of law in development, stunted by significant limiting factors that prevent the coalescence of legal principles. To date, no holistic empirical exploration of data breach cases has offered sufficient detail to explore these factors. This descriptive empirical study analyzes, in detail, 225 data breach cases from 2005–2022, reviewing these cases over an extended period to descriptively identify key trends and changes within a bona fide data breach case’s …