Litigation Commons^™

Law School News: Middle Schoolers Explore The Rule Of Law At Second Annual Mandell-Boisclair Justice Camp 07-17-2025, Jordan J. Phelan

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

The Children’S Lawsuits: Building A Global Movement In Law And Society, Mary Christina Wood

Washington and Lee Law Review

This essay describes the Atmospheric Trust Litigation (ATL) campaign, spearheaded by Our Children’s Trust, consisting of climate cases brought by youth premised on the public trust principle and, later, on express constitutional rights. The essay characterizes the cases as (1) accomplishing a “rights turn” in environmental law by invoking constitutional claims rather than statutory claims that previously marked almost all environmental litigation; (2) establishing a unified global framework of climate responsibility by depicting the planet’s atmosphere as a global public trust asset which all governments have an obligation to protect; and (3) galvanizing a youth climate movement centered on the …

“Small” Voices, Big Wins: Analyzing Remedies In Children’S Climate Cases, Maria Antonia Tigre

Washington and Lee Law Review

Children’s climate litigation has emerged as a powerful tool to address the climate crisis, with young plaintiffs around the world taking governments and corporations to court to demand climate action. This Article examines successful cases—those in which relief sought by the applicants was fully or partially granted—across five continents, providing an “around the world” perspective on the evolution and impact of youth-led climate litigation. Focusing on landmark cases in Australia, Colombia, South Africa, South Korea, and the United States, this analysis highlights the arguments presented by young plaintiffs and the judicial reasoning that supported the relief granted. Through a comparative …

Resolving The Class Action Paradox, Alissa Del Riego, Joseph J. Avery

Cardozo Law Review

A paradox exists at the core of class actions. They were designed to perform a valuable function, protecting and compensating individuals who would not otherwise have legal recourse, yet in practice they have effectively silenced and disenfranchised class members, leaving them unaware and uninformed of litigation commenced on their behalf, the nature of their potential claims, and the damages they may seek. In this Article, we take three significant steps toward resolving the class action paradox. First, we unpack recent scholarship that led to the introduction of “representational notice,” a mechanism that leverages advances in technology and the social sciences …

Taking The Road Less Traveled Makes All The Difference: The Tenth Circuit Applies The Collateral Order Doctrine Narrowly—And Properly—In Coomer V. Make Your Life Epic Llc, Paul Cooke

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Robin Hood Or Robbin’ The Goods? The Second Circuit Restores Sec Disgorgement To Equity In Sec V. Govil, Nikolette C. Dusevic

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Presentations: Pennsylvania's Environmental Rights Amendment And Environmental Justice, Samantha Phillps Beers, John C. Dernbach, Emma H. Bast, Margaret O. Murphy

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

A Beacon Trying To Signal Heading: The Ninth Circuit Interprets The California Whistleblower Protection Act In Killgore V. Specpro Professional Services, Llc, Naseem Memari

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

A Modern Moby-Dick: The First Circuit Reveals How Man's Unchecked Fixations Still Impact Nantucket's North Atlantic Right Whale In Nantucket Residents Against Turbines V. U.S. Bureau Of Ocean Energy Management, Julia A. Snyder

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

A Monumental Tug Of War: The Clash Over Presidential Authority And National Monuments In Murphy Co. V. Biden, Benjamin S. Levy

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Law School News: John Dorsey L'10 Selected For U.S. Bankruptcy Court In Rhode Island 6-7-2025, Helga Melgar

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Climatologist Mann's Defamation Suit Victory: Can It Resolve The Crisis Of Expertise, David S. Caudill

Faculty Publications

When a jury awarded one million dollars in punitive damages to climatologist Michael Mann, in his defamation suit against writer Mark Steyn (who accused Mann of scientific fraud), it was newsworthy, even surprising, because opinions regarding scientific matters are rarely actionable. And yet it was not seen as a groundbreaking event in terms of legal doctrine, since the outcome was easily justifiable— Steyn’s accusation was provably false. However, even if the Constitutional contours of defamation law did not change, the Mann verdict has far-reaching implications for a major contemporary social phenomenon, namely the so-called crisis of expertise, a term identifying …

Does Third Party Litigation Funding Need Regulations On Consumer Protection, Ronen Avraham, Eric Schuller, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

Transcript of a roundtable discussion during the Third-Party Litigation Symposium at the S.J. Quinney College of Law.

Third-Party Litigation Funding, Jonas Anderson

Utah Law Review

As the legal system confronts rising litigation costs, technological disruption, and global investment in legal claims, the discussion around TPLF is both urgent and overdue. This symposium issue provides ways to illuminate the path forward— through scholarly engagement, critical analysis, and policy innovation.

Predicting Federal Third-Party Funding Regulation, Victoria Shannon Sahani

Utah Law Review

Third-party funding is a global phenomenon, although regulatory enforcement is local. Regulatory approaches vary widely from country to country and within countries, especially in federal legal systems, such as Canada, Australia, and the United States. The United States federal government is learning about third-party funding with an eye toward potential future regulation. Congress has been investigating funding, as evidenced by testimony in congressional hearings, proposed federal legislation, and a nonpartisan study on third-party funding by the Government Accountability Office. In addition, after more than a decade of observation, the United States Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee recently formed a committee …

Third-Party Funding Of Patent Litigation: Problems And Solutions, Korok Ray, Adam Olson

Utah Law Review

This Article documents the rise of third-party funding in patent litigation. We track funding sources for patent lawsuits in the United States from 2002 to 2021, which show an increase in cases and percentage funded by third parties. While we cannot say third-party funding increased patent litigation, we can observe the correlation. The use of the champerty doctrine by patent trolls distorts the marketplace and causes frivolous litigation.

The secondary patent market created a robust litigation market in which non-practicing entities (NPEs) can buy from innovators and sue defendants. Capital investments bet on litigation, hoping for a return without interest …

Don’T Go Chasing Litigation Funding Waterfalls, David S. Abrams, Tom Baker

Utah Law Review

Proponents of third-party litigation funding argue that it is socially beneficial, helping parties bring meritorious litigation that otherwise would not be possible, due in part to the ability of the plaintiff to share risk with funders. But the reality of how some third-party funding contracts are structured belies this theory. Many such contracts include “waterfall” clauses whereby funders get paid back first upon successful case resolution. This leaves most of the risk on the plaintiff, the party usually least equipped to bear it. This is at odds with the prescription of standard economic theory, which suggests that the residual claimant …

Does Third Party Litigation Funding Need Regulations On Consumer Protection, Ronen Avraham, Eric Schuller, Tony Sebok

Utah Law Review

Transcript of a roundtable discussion during the Third-Party Litigation Symposium at the S.J. Quinney College of Law

A Quarter Century After The Products Liability Restatement: Reflections, Aaron D. Twerski

Brooklyn Law Review

A quarter century has passed since the adoption by the American Law Institute of the Products Liability Restatement. It is time to reflect on whether it has influenced the courts. At the time of its adoption there was considerable controversy with regard to several sections. Some sections were not controversial. There was little disagreement that a plaintiff may draw a res ipsa like inference of product defect. Nor was there disagreement that if a product was in violation of statute that the product was defective per se. Two sections were highly controversial. The Restatement held that a product could not …

Into The Twilight Zone: Reverse Citizenship Discrimination, Damage Caps, And Escalating Incoherence, William R. Corbett

Brooklyn Law Review

Federal employment discrimination law has become such an asymmetrical and largely incoherent body of law that those who find themselves in its midst can feel as though they have entered another realm or dimension—the “twilight zone.” The role of Section 1981 (42 U.S.C. § 1981) in federal employment discrimination law poses some significant mysteries and problems. The statute was enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to ensure the rights of recently liberated slaves, and it was amended in 1870. One of the rights guaranteed by Section 1981 is the right to make and enforce contracts on …