F11rs Sgr No. 33 (Veteran Recognition),
2011
Louisiana State University
F11rs Sgr No. 33 (Veteran Recognition), Glorioso
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A RESOLUTION
To honor and commemorate the students and alumni of Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College as well as all others who have served and continue to serve the United States of America through the Armed Forces
F11rs Sgr No. 29 (Sidewalks),
2011
Louisiana State University
F11rs Sgr No. 29 (Sidewalks), Landry, Baudoin, Hammett, Sullivan
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A RESOLUTION
To urge and request the City of Baton Rouge to add and repair sidewalks and lighting to the Northgates of LSU
F11rs Sgr No. 31 (E. Boyd Sidewalks),
2011
Louisiana State University
F11rs Sgr No. 31 (E. Boyd Sidewalks), Landry, Baudoin, Hammett, Sullivan
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A RESOLUTION
To urge and request the City of Baton Rouge to add and improve sidewalks to East Boyd Drive and surrounding areas
F11rs Sgr No. 27 (Plus Minus Grading System),
2011
Louisiana State University
F11rs Sgr No. 27 (Plus Minus Grading System), Sullivan, Loga
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A RESOLUTION
To urge and request that Louisiana State University maintain the current quality point Evaluation System as opposed to a plus-minus system
Rethinking Discrimination Law,
2011
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Rethinking Discrimination Law, Sandra F. Sperino
Michigan Law Review
Modern employment discrimination law is defined by an increasingly complex set of frameworks. These frameworks structure the ways that courts, juries, and litigants think about discrimination. This Article challenges whether courts should use the frameworks to conceptualize discrimination. It argues that just as faulty sorting contributes to stereotyping and societal discrimination, courts are using faulty structures to substantively limit discrimination claims. This Article makes three central contributions. First, it demonstrates how discrimination analysis has been reduced to a rote sorting process. It recognizes and makes explicit courts' methodology so that the structure of discrimination analysis and its effects can be …
Deconstructing 'Just And Proper': Arguments In Favor Of Adopting The 'Remedial Purpose' Approach To Section 10(J) Labor Injunctions,
2011
University of Michigan Law School
Deconstructing 'Just And Proper': Arguments In Favor Of Adopting The 'Remedial Purpose' Approach To Section 10(J) Labor Injunctions, William K. Briggs
Michigan Law Review
Congress, through the 1947 addition of section 10(j) to the National Labor Relations Act, authorized district courts to grant preliminary injunctive relief for unfair labor practices if they deem such relief "just and proper." To this day a circuit split persists over the correct interpretation of this "just and proper" standard. Some circuits interpret "just and proper" to require application of the traditional equitable principles approach that normally governs preliminary injunctions. Other circuits interpret "just and proper" to require an analysis of whether injunctive relief is necessary to preserve the National Labor Relations Board's remedial power This Note examines the …
Using Public Disclosure As The Vesting Point For Moral Rights Under The Visual Artists Rights Act,
2011
University of Michigan Law School
Using Public Disclosure As The Vesting Point For Moral Rights Under The Visual Artists Rights Act, Elizabeth M. Bock
Michigan Law Review
In 2010, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit confronted the novel question of when moral rights protections vest under the Visual Artists Rights Act. In Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc. v. Bichel, the First Circuit determined that the protections of the Visual Artists Rights Act begin when a work is "created" under the Copyright Act. This Note argues that this decision harms moral rights conceptually and is likely to result in unpredictable and inconsistent decisions. This Note proposes instead that these statutory protections should vest when an artist determines that his work is complete and presents …
Samantar And Executive Power,
2011
University of Georgia Law School
Samantar And Executive Power, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
This essay examines Samantar v. Yousuf in the context of broader debate about the relationship between federal common law and executive power. Samantar represents simply the latest effort by the Executive Branch to literally shape the meaning of law through a process referred to in the literature as “executive lawmaking.” While traditional accounts of executive lawmaking typically have treated the idea as a singular concept, Samantar demonstrates the need to bifurcate the concept into at least two different categories: acts of executive lawmaking decoupled from pending litigation and acts of executive lawmaking taken expressly in response to litigation. As Samantar …
Breaking Free From Insanity: A White-Collar Crime Approach To Drug War Policy,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
Breaking Free From Insanity: A White-Collar Crime Approach To Drug War Policy, Brian Harrison
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Preventing crime should be a top priority for law enforcement. A victim of crime would readily agree that never having been a victim at all is preferable to suffering at the hands of a criminal. Even if the criminal is later caught and punished, a victim remains a victim. Despite this simple truth, current drug policy does not place a top priority preventing the laundering of drug-tainted money. As a result, the United States remains a victim in the War on Drugs.' As will be discussed, the crime of money laundering can be prevented in many instances by prosecuting banks …
What Would It Look Like If We Cared About Narcotics Trafficking? An Argument To Attack Narcotics Capital Rather Than Labor,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
What Would It Look Like If We Cared About Narcotics Trafficking? An Argument To Attack Narcotics Capital Rather Than Labor, Mark Osler
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Law enforcement actions should be judged by a simple measure: are they solving a problem? After all, we Americans loathe the loss of freedom and the spending of tax dollars, and we should never take away citizens' freedom and money unless there actually is a problem being solved. Illegal narcotics are a problem, but we aren't solving it. Narcotics trafficking and use lead to violence, undermine productivity,' and rip apart the social fabric of families and communities. Despite much attention to these issues, drug use in this country continues at high levels, even among children.2 We have failed, and it …
Again And Again We Suffer: The Poor And The Endurance Of The "War On Drugs",
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
Again And Again We Suffer: The Poor And The Endurance Of The "War On Drugs", Brian Gilmore
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Decade After Drug Decriminalization: What Can The United States Learn From The Portuguese Model?,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
A Decade After Drug Decriminalization: What Can The United States Learn From The Portuguese Model?, Jordan Blair Woods
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Kingpin Act Vs. California's Compassionate Use Act: The Dubious Battle Between State And Federal Drug Laws,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
The Kingpin Act Vs. California's Compassionate Use Act: The Dubious Battle Between State And Federal Drug Laws, Sumeet H. Chugani, Xingjian Zhao
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Exclusion In California's Marijuana Reform Movement,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
The Politics Of Exclusion In California's Marijuana Reform Movement, Brooke Mascagni
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rise Of The Pills,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
Rise Of The Pills, Ken Lammers Jr.
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statistical Criticism Of Jury Selection Methods In The Western District Of Oklahoma,
2011
Oklahoma State University
Statistical Criticism Of Jury Selection Methods In The Western District Of Oklahoma, R. Darcy, Brett M. Stingley
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Toward A System Of Invention Registration: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act,
2011
University of Iowa College of Law
Toward A System Of Invention Registration: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Jason Rantanen, Lee Petherbridge
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) represents the most significant legislative event affecting patent law and practice in more than half a century. In addressing the AIA, scholars and policymakers have focused with an almost laser-like exclusivity on the AIA’s imposition of a first-to-file-or-first-to-publicly-disclose system, which replaces an over 200-year-old first-to-invent tradition. This myopia, we suggest, overlooks a part of the AIA that could hold a substantially greater potential to jeopardize American innovation, job creation, and economic competitiveness: the imposition of a mechanism for supplemental examination.
Addressing Gaps In The Dodd-Frank Act: Directors' Risk Management Oversight Obligations,
2011
Seton Hall University School of Law
Addressing Gaps In The Dodd-Frank Act: Directors' Risk Management Oversight Obligations, Kristin N. Johnson
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In the years leading to the recent financial crisis, finance theorists introduced innovative methods, including quantitative financial models and derivative instruments, to measure and mitigate risk exposure. During the financial crisis, financial institutions facing insolvency revealed pervasive misunderstandings, misapplications, and mistaken assumptions regarding these complex risk management methods. As losses in financial markets escalated and caused liquidity and solvency crises, commentators sharply criticized directors and executives at large financial institutions for their risk management decisions. By adopting the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Congress directly and indirectly addresses certain risk management oversight concerns at large, complex financial …
Collateral Review Of Career Offender Sentences: The Case For Coram Nobis,
2011
University of Michigan Law School
Collateral Review Of Career Offender Sentences: The Case For Coram Nobis, Douglas J. Bench Jr.
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Occasionally, criminals correctly interpret the law while courts err. Litigation pursuant to the federal Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) includes numerous examples. The ACCA imposes harsher sentences upon felons in possession of firearms with prior "violent felony" convictions. Over time, courts defined "violent" so contrary to its common meaning that it eventually came to encompass driving under the influence, unwanted touching, and the failure to report to correctional facilities. However, in a series of recent decisions, the Supreme Court has attempted to clarify the meaning of violent in the context of the ACCA and, in the process, excluded such offenses. …
Fair Lending 2.0: A Borrower-Based Solution To Discrimination In Mortgage Lending,
2011
New York University School of Law
Fair Lending 2.0: A Borrower-Based Solution To Discrimination In Mortgage Lending, Jared Ruiz Bybee
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Fair lending laws promise that borrowers with similar credit profiles will receive similar loan products-regardless of their race. Yet, studies reveal that black and Latino borrowers consistently receive loan products that are inferior to those of white borrowers with similar credit characteristics. Despite frequent amendments since their passage during the Civil Rights Era, the Fair Lending Laws that opened doors for minority borrowers are unable to root out the subtle discrimination that persists in today's mortgage lending market. These traditional Fair Lending Laws are built on an outdated framework that focuses exclusively on punishing lenders and righting past wrongs. This …
