Board Of Pharmacy,
2020
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, Stephanie Mendivil, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Contractors’ State License Board,
2020
University of San Diego
Contractors’ State License Board, Mariela Romo, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing,
2020
University of San Diego
Board Of Registered Nursing, Shana Sobel, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy,
2020
University of San Diego
California Board Of Accountancy, Thomas Burke, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
State Bar Of California,
2020
University of San Diego
State Bar Of California, Madeline Rojer, Alaina Dye, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Committee Of Bar Examiners,
2020
University of San Diego
Committee Of Bar Examiners, Halie Turigliatti, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education,
2020
University of San Diego
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Mikaila Hernández, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Insurance,
2020
University of San Diego
Department Of Insurance, Marie Mcdonald Hulen, Brittany Hodgson, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Public Utilities Commission,
2020
University of San Diego
California Public Utilities Commission, Michael J. Melton, Marcus Friedman, Strider Kachelein, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Business Oversight,
2020
University of San Diego
Department Of Business Oversight, James D. Colleran, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Transition Without Transformation: The Legacy Of Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement,
2020
Technological University Dublin
Transition Without Transformation: The Legacy Of Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement, Gene Carolan
Articles
In recent years, the transitional justice framework has expanded to include a broader notion of transformative justice, which strives for socio-political reform in addition to legal accountability. Over the course of two civil wars, Sudan has grappled with various attempts at transition and transformation with mixed results. Though the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement brought an end to decades of North–South conflict, South Sudan’s subsequent descent into civil war has been characterised by a flawed transition and a lack of any immediate transformative potential. This paper analyses the Comprehensive Peace Agreement’s transitional mechanisms. In doing so, it explores how certain mechanisms …
Was Brown V. Board Of Education Correctly Decided?,
2020
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Was Brown V. Board Of Education Correctly Decided?, Ronald Turner
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Easy As Abc: Why The Abc Test Should Be Adopted As The Sole Test Of Employee–Independent Contractor Status,
2020
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Easy As Abc: Why The Abc Test Should Be Adopted As The Sole Test Of Employee–Independent Contractor Status, Eric Markovits
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
This Note examines the features and history of the three most commonly used tests for employee classification before advocating that the ABC test be more broadly adopted going forward.
End-Of-Life Decision Making: Policy And Statutory Progress (2011-2020),
2020
Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law
End-Of-Life Decision Making: Policy And Statutory Progress (2011-2020), Jocelyn Downie, Mona Gupta, L. Wayne Sumner, Joshua Wales
Reports & Public Policy Documents
In 2009, the Royal Society of Canada (RSC) identified a series of urgent scientific and public policy questions. It established a series of five Expert Panels to study the issues and provide recommendations for next steps. It is now timely to revisit the findings of these Expert Panel Reports. What impact have they had? Have their recommendations been implemented? What are the next steps in terms of policy options?
To answer these questions, the RSC is establishing Policy Briefing Committees (PBC) to:
- describe the context, findings, and recommendations of the report;
- track policy developments in relation to the panel’s findings …
Fully Funded Pensions,
2020
Marquette University Law School
Fully Funded Pensions, Jonathan Barry Forman
Marquette Law Review
At retirement, workers want to have enough income to support themselves throughout their retirement years. In that regard, financial planners often suggest that retiring workers should aim to replace 70 to 80% of their annual preretirement earnings. Social Security benefits typically replace around 35% of the typical worker’s preretirement earnings, and the purpose of this Article is to show how pensions could and should be designed to replace, say, 40% of the typical worker’s preretirement earnings throughout her retirement years. In particular, because so many public and private pension plans are underfunded, this Article focuses on how to fully fund …
Balancing Sorna And The Sixth Amendment: The Case For A "Restricted Circumstance-Specific Approach",
2020
Marquette University Law School
Balancing Sorna And The Sixth Amendment: The Case For A "Restricted Circumstance-Specific Approach", John F. Howard
Marquette Law Review
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) is in place to protect the public, children especially, from sex offenders. Under SORNA, anyone and everyone convicted of what the law defines as a “sex offense” is required to register as a “sex offender,” providing accurate and up-to-date information on where they live, work, and go to school. Failure to do so constitutes a federal crime punishable by up to ten years imprisonment. But how do federal courts determine whether a particular state-level criminal offense constitutes a “sex offense” under SORNA? Oftentimes when doing comparisons between state and federal law for …
Marijuana Law Reform In 2020 And Beyond: Where We Are And Where We’Re Going,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Marijuana Law Reform In 2020 And Beyond: Where We Are And Where We’Re Going, Sam Kamin
Seattle University Law Review
With another presidential election now looming on the horizon, both political parties and both sides of the marijuana law reform debate are once again preparing for the possibility of a seismic change in how marijuana is regulated in the United States. In this Article, I lay out the state of marijuana law and policy in the United States today with an eye toward that uncertain future. I describe the differential treatment of marijuana under state and federal law and the tensions this causes for those seeking to take advantage of marijuana law reform in the states. I analyze recent changes …
Tiptoeing Through The Landmines: The Evolution Of States’ Legal Ethics Authority Regarding Representing Cannabis Clients,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Tiptoeing Through The Landmines: The Evolution Of States’ Legal Ethics Authority Regarding Representing Cannabis Clients, Karen E. Boxx
Seattle University Law Review
Despite the continued federal classification of cannabis as an illegal drug, states have legalized the possession, use, production, and sale of cannabis. In order to do so, the states have created complex regulatory schemes to control and monitor the cannabis industry and satisfy the federal government concerns, such as use by minors and organized crime involvement. First, this Article presents the ethical dilemma of cannabis lawyering. Second, this Article describes the history, evolution, and current status of the various states’ pronouncements on a lawyer’s ethical duties with respect to the business and use of cannabis that may be legal under …
Unfair-But-Not-Deceptive: Confronting The Ambiguity In Washington State’S Consumer Protection Act,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Unfair-But-Not-Deceptive: Confronting The Ambiguity In Washington State’S Consumer Protection Act, Emily Beale
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will argue that Washington state courts must promulgate a new, workable definition of “unfair-but-not-deceptive” under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act. Washington courts have acknowledged that a business act or practice can be unfair but not deceptive, but a simple recognition does not fulfill the liberal intentions of the Consumer Protection Act. By continuously declining to define unfair- but-not-deceptive, Washington courts have left consumers vulnerable and without recourse. This Comment will highlight the approaches developed by the federal government and other state governments on how to confront the ambiguity of unfair-but-not-deceptive and will propose a concrete definition for the term.
"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
"Inciting A Riot": Silent Sentinels, Group Protests, And Prisoners' Petition And Associational Rights, Nicole B. Godfrey
Seattle University Law Review
This Article argues for increased legal protections for prisoners who choose to engage in group protest to shed light on the conditions of their incarceration. A companion piece to a similar article that focused on prisoner free speech rights, this Article uses the acts of protest utilized by the Silent Sentinels to examine why prisoners’ rights to petition and association should be strengthened. By strengthening these rights, the Article argues that we will advance the values enshrined by the First Amendment’s Petition Clause while simultaneously advancing the rights of the incarcerated millions with little to no political power.
The Article …
