Legal Writing and Research Commons^™

Real-World Consequences For Online Actions: The Case For Expanding Employee Harassment Protection Via Employers’ Rights Of Action, Alexander Barnes

Seattle University Law Review

This Note argues for expanding employers’ access to legal remedies that allow them to recoup the costs of protecting their employees from swatting, doxing, and other online harassment arising from their employees’ professional activity. Part I provides a brief description and history of the online harassment problem and its potentially deadly dangers. Part II describes employers’ legal responsibility to take action to protect their employees from harassment aimed at their employees within the scope of their employment. Part III explores common legal remedies that are currently available to employers, using the state of Washington as an example. Part III also …

Foreseeability And Duty In Washington Negligence Law: Leaving The Road Less Traveled By, Leo Linder

Seattle University Law Review

Washington negligence law is a confusing labyrinth of foreseeability that not even Ariadne’s string could guide plaintiffs out of. Foreseeability is implicated in four distinct analyses, several of which overlap considerably. Doctrines that were once questions of law are now questions of fact, and vice versa. Something needs to change.

Washington has taken the novel approach of bifurcating the duty element into two parts—duty’s mere existence, which is a question of law for the court to determine; and duty’s scope, which is a question of fact handed off to the jury to determine. Foreseeability impacts both of these assessments, but …

Reimagining The Music Industry: In Search Of A More Perfect Union, Loren E. Mulraine

Law Faculty Scholarship

This Article critiques the entrenched business practices of the modern music industry and argues that its prevailing contractual and financial structures disproportionately disadvantage artists. Focusing on ownership of master recordings, unilateral option clauses, controlled composition provisions, recoupment practices, and copyright termination rights under the Copyright Act of 1976, the Article demonstrates how industry norms undermine the economic interests of creators despite rising industry revenues. It contends that artists should receive equity ownership in master recordings, benefit from shorter and more balanced contract terms, obtain full statutory mechanical royalties, and have recoupment calculated at net receipt rates rather than on their …

Heresies, Heretics, And Hermeneutics: The Battle Of Textualism Against Pragmatism--And Itself--On The Robert Court, Jeffrey A. Van Detta

Belmont Law Review

This Article examines the deepening jurisprudential conflict on the Roberts Court over statutory interpretation, framing the contest between textualism and pragmatism as analogous to theological disputes over orthodoxy and heresy. Drawing on the interpretive writings of Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer, as well as the scholarly work of William Eskridge, the Article argues that contemporary textualism—particularly in its more rigid forms—risks distorting statutory meaning when divorced from broader contextual and purposive analysis. Through an eclectic examination of three statutory battlegrounds—the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Reconstruction-era civil rights legislation and its modern successors, and the Alien Tort Statute—the Article demonstrates …

"Consent By Registration" After Mallory--A Fifty State Summary, Will Lattimore

Belmont Law Review

In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., the United States Supreme Court held that a state’s application of “consent by registration” comports with due process, provided that the state’s statutory scheme treats business registration as consent to personal jurisdiction. In this Article, Will Lattimore offers a comprehensive fifty-state survey of corporate registration statutes and related appellate decisions to assess how Mallory reshapes the personal jurisdiction landscape. The Article situates “consent by registration” within the broader doctrinal framework of general, specific, and consent-based jurisdiction, tracing the impact of Daimler AG v. Bauman on lower courts’ analyses and explaining how Mallory …

Eliminating Tennessee's Parental Bill Of Wrongs In Favor Of A Children's Bill Of Rights, April Carroll Meldrum, Bruce L. Beverly

Belmont Law Review

In Eliminating Tennessee’s Parental Bill of Wrongs in Favor of a Children’s Bill of Rights, April Carroll Meldrum and Bruce L. Beverly critically examine Tennessee’s Parental Bill of Rights (PBOR), codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-101(a)(3), and argue that it has become outdated, counterproductive, and misaligned with modern family law policy. The authors trace the legislative history of the PBOR from its 1997 enactment through subsequent amendments, demonstrating how a statute originally intended to ensure access and informational parity for noncustodial parents has evolved into a rigid and litigation-fueling mechanism. They contend that the PBOR conflicts with Tennessee’s …

Integrating Sustainable Development Goals In The Law Curriculum: Legal Education For "People, Planet, And Prosperity", Md Saiful Karim, Abdullah-Al Arif, Andrew Garwood-Gowers, Fran Humphries, Md Mahtab Uddin, Afshin Akhtar-Khavari, Rowena Maguire, Bridget Lewis, Lucy Cradduck, Lachlan Robb, Tina Cockburn, Kelly Purser, Sam Boyle, Anne Matthew, Brydon Wang, Alex Deagon

Belmont Law Review

This article argues that meaningful integration of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into the law curriculum is essential to preparing future lawyers to address contemporary global challenges. Drawing on the historical evolution of sustainable development and its embedding in international and domestic legal systems, the authors demonstrate the multifaceted relationship between the SDGs and diverse areas of law, extending well beyond environmental regulation to encompass economic, social, and human rights dimensions. Focusing on professional law degrees such as the LLB and JD, the article presents targeted case studies illustrating how SDG awareness can be incorporated into core and …

A Woman's Right To Change Her Mind: The Abortion Pill Reversal Debate, Kelsey Perault

Belmont Law Review

This Note examines the legal, medical, and ethical controversy surrounding abortion pill reversal (APR), a protocol involving the administration of progesterone after ingestion of mifepristone in an attempt to counteract a medication abortion. After outlining the scientific and regulatory history of mifepristone, misoprostol, and progesterone, the Note surveys emerging state legislation that either mandates disclosure of APR as part of informed consent or prohibits the practice altogether. It analyzes the debate within the frameworks of off-label prescribing, medical malpractice, informed consent doctrine, and right-to-try laws. The Note argues that if abortion is legally protected as an exercise of reproductive autonomy, …

Deepfakes: Identity Misappropriation In The Digital Age, Benjamin Tandy

Belmont Law Review

This Note examines the rapid emergence of deepfake technology and its growing threat to individual identity, reputation, and democratic processes. Tracing the technological development of synthetic media—from “cheapfakes” to AI-driven deepfakes—the author highlights how generative adversarial networks and machine learning tools have enabled the creation of highly realistic, nonconsensual visual and audio fabrications. The Note documents the predominance of deepfake pornography and the increasing use of synthetic media in political misinformation campaigns, emphasizing the reputational and dignitary harms suffered by victims. After surveying state-level legislative responses, including both criminal prohibitions and civil causes of action, the author evaluates the limitations …

Style, Substance, And Process: An Elegant Trio, Justin Iverson

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

From Briefs To Bytes: How Generative Ai Is Transforming Legal Writing And Practice, Joseph Regalia

Scholarly Works

ChatGPT is having a moment in the legal field. And for good reason: Generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) was already disrupting the practice of law before OpenAI’s new chatbot came on the scene. But ChatGPT marks a new era. The brain behind OpenAI’s latest AI contains up to a trillion artificial neurons and was trained on hundreds of billions of pieces of text gathered on the web. All that data makes for the smartest AI ever.

But what’s more important is that all that computational muscle is aimed at things lawyers do every day: (1) Understanding complex concepts, (2) analyzing convoluted …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Corporate Law In The Global South: Heterodox Stakeholderism, Mariana Pargendler

Seattle University Law Review

How do the corporate laws of Global South jurisdictions differ from their Global North counterparts? Prevailing stereotypes depict the corporate laws of developing countries as either antiquated or plagued by problems of enforcement and misfit despite formal convergence. This Article offers a different view by showing how Global South jurisdictions have pioneered heterodox stakeholder approaches in corporate law, such as the erosion of limited liability for purposes of stakeholder protection in Brazil and India, the adoption of mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia and India, and the large-scale program of Black corporate ownership and empowerment in South Africa, among many …

Stakeholder Capitalism’S Greatest Challenge: Reshaping A Public Consensus To Govern A Global Economy, Leo E. Strine Jr., Michael Klain

Seattle University Law Review

The Berle XIV: Developing a 21st Century Corporate Governance Model Conference asks whether there is a viable 21st Century Stakeholder Governance model. In our conference keynote article, we argue that to answer that question yes requires restoring—to use Berle’s term—a “public consensus” throughout the global economy in favor of the balanced model of New Deal capitalism, within which corporations could operate in a way good for all their stakeholders and society, that Berle himself supported.

The world now faces problems caused in large part by the enormous international power of corporations and the institutional investors who dominate their governance. These …

Stakeholder Governance As Governance By Stakeholders, Brett Mcdonnell

Seattle University Law Review

Much debate within corporate governance today centers on the proper role of corporate stakeholders, such as employees, customers, creditors, suppliers, and local communities. Scholars and reformers advocate for greater attention to stakeholder interests under a variety of banners, including ESG, sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and stakeholder governance. So far, that advocacy focuses almost entirely on arguing for an expanded understanding of corporate purpose. It argues that corporate governance should be for various stakeholders, not shareholders alone.

This Article examines and approves of that broadened understanding of corporate purpose. However, it argues that we should understand stakeholder governance as extending well …

Stakeholder Governance On The Ground (And In The Sky), Stephen Johnson, Frank Partnoy

Seattle University Law Review

Professor Frank Partnoy: This is a marvelous gathering, and it is all due to Chuck O’Kelley and the special gentleness, openness, and creativity that he brings to this symposium. For more than a decade, he has been open to new and creative ways to discuss important issues surrounding business law and Adolf Berle’s legacy. We also are grateful to Dorothy Lund for co-organizing this gathering.

In introducing Stephen Johnson, I am reminded of a previous Berle, where Chuck allowed me some time to present the initial thoughts that led to my book, WAIT: The Art and Science of Delay. Part …

The Structure Of Corporate Law Revolutions, William Savitt

Seattle University Law Review

Since, call it 1970, corporate law has operated under a dominant conception of governance that identifies profit-maximization for stockholder benefit as the purpose of the corporation. Milton Friedman’s essay The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, published in September of that year, provides a handy, if admittedly imprecise, marker for the coronation of the shareholder-primacy paradigm. In the decades that followed, corporate law scholars pursued an ever-narrowing research agenda with the purpose and effect of confirming the shareholder-primacy paradigm. Corporate jurisprudence followed a similar path, slowly at first and later accelerating, to discover in the precedents and …

A History Of Corporate Law Federalism In The Twentieth Century, William W. Bratton

Seattle University Law Review

This Article describes the emergence of corporate law federalism across a long twentieth century. The period begins with New Jersey’s successful initiation of charter competition in 1888 and ends with the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. The federalism in question describes the interrelation of state and federal regulation of corporate internal affairs. This Article takes a positive approach, pursuing no normative bottom line. It makes six observations: (1) the federalism describes a division of subject matter, with internal affairs regulated by the states and securities issuance and trading regulated by the federal government; (2) the federalism is an …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

How To Interpret The Securities Laws?, Zachary J. Gubler

Seattle University Law Review

In discussions of the federal securities laws, the SEC usually gets most of the attention. This makes some sense. After all, it is the agency charged with administrating the securities laws and regulating the industry as a whole. It makes the majority of the laws; it engages in enforcement actions; it reacts to crises; and it, or sometimes even its individual commissioners, intervene publicly in policy debates. Often overlooked in such discussion, however, is the role of the Supreme Court in shaping securities law, and a new book by Adam Pritchard and Robert Thompson demonstrates why this is an oversight. …