Legal Remedies Commons^™

Innate Property: The Danger Of Incongruency Between Law And The Biological And Behavioral Roots Of Property And Possessiveness, Aaron Schwabach

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Property law is, in some areas, dangerously out of step with property expectations. Property—the idea that a place, object, or idea can belong to a person—is at the root of the world’s economies and thus also at the root of much of its laws. Property is neither solely a creature of positive law, nor of some abstract natural law with a moral underpinning, but rather may be biologically determined, much as Noam Chomsky proposed for languages in Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.1 The idea that ownership is at least behaviorally, and perhaps to some extent instinctively, determined has been …

What We Are Owed: The Possibilities Of A Civil Law Response To Sexual Injuries, Nathalie Marx

Scripps Senior Theses

Drawing from philosophical, feminist, and legal frameworks, this thesis aims to reconceptualize our understanding of sexual violations. I suggest that rape and other sexual violations produce injuries unique from other forms of physical violence that must be addressed as an extension of a culture which objectifies, restricts the agency of, and shames women. It is argued that through the ability for survivors to bring a civil claim of negligence against their perpetrators following a sexual injury, pathways for restorative healing and cultural transformation are opened, and a more responsive legal standard for fault is created. This paper responds to theories …

Epic Enters. V. 10 Brown & Howard Wharf Condo. Ass’N, 253 A.3d 383 (R.I. 2021), Matthew Lewicki

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Other Hand Formula, Maytal Gilboa, Yotam Kaplan

Lewis & Clark Law Review

A defendant who obtained an undeserved benefit at the plaintiff’s expense must make restitution of that benefit. This is the fundamental maxim of the law of unjust enrichment, allowing recovery based on the defendant’s gain rather than on the plaintiff’s loss. Unfortunately, liability in unjust enrichment is notoriously unprincipled. The key problem is that scholars and courts cannot agree on the correct manner for distinguishing meritorious claims from non-meritorious ones in this important area of the law.

To correct this deficiency, the present Essay provides a simple mathematical formula explaining when plaintiffs should be able to recover the defendant’s gain …

Getting Into Equity, Samuel L. Bray, Paul B. Miller

Journal Articles

For two centuries, common lawyers have frequently talked about a “cause of action.” But “cause of action” is not an organizing principle for equity. This Article shows how a plaintiff gets into equity, and it shows equity is shaped by the interplay of its remedial, procedural, and substantive law. Equity is adjectival, related to law rather than the other way around. Remedies, not rights, are what give it power. And for getting into equity, it is the grievance that is central. To insist on an equitable cause of action is to work a fundamental change in how a plaintiff gets …

Laprocina V. Lourie, 250 A.3d 1281 (R.I. 2021), Jeffrey Prystowsky

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

When Interpretive Communities Clash On Immigration Law: The Courts’ Mediating Role In Noncitizens’ Rights And Remedies, Peter Margulies

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

2021 Surveys Of Rhode Island Law

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Standing, Equity, And Injury In Fact, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

This contribution to the Notre Dame Law Review's annual Federal Courts symposium on "The Nature of the Federal Equity Power" asks what the traditions of equity can tell us about Article III standing. I take as my point of departure the observation by Professors Sam Bray and Paul Miller, in their contribution to the symposium, that equity does not have causes of action as such--or at least not in the same way as actions at law. This is potentially important for standing, as many academic critiques of the Supreme Court's standing jurisprudence have argued that standing should turn on whether …

Equity, Law, And The Seventh Amendment, Samuel L. Bray

Journal Articles

The Seventh Amendment requires that the civil jury trial right be “preserved” in “Suits at common law.” Those bits of constitutional text have long set the justices on a path of historical reconstruction. For roughly two centuries, the Supreme Court has determined the scope of the civil jury trial right in federal court by reference to historic English courts. But no one is happy with the current test. In one widely used variant, it requires an inquiry into analogous 1791 actions, followed by an inquiry into the legal or equitable provenance of the remedy sought, and then a weighing that …

Autumn Is Coming: A Novel Liability Theory That May Kill Pharmaceutical Evergreening, Uri Y. Hacohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Pharmaceutical evergreening-attempts by brand-name manufacturers to leverage patent rights to artificially extend legal protection for drugs-is among the most pressing and unresolved public policy challenges of our time. On July 14, 2021, in Sanofi et al. vs. Unipharm Ltd., the Israeli Supreme Court adopted a novel and internationally unprecedented legal policy to combat the evergreening pandemic. By using its equitable powers, the Israeli court empowered a generic manufacturer, Unipharm, to claim on behalf of the public interest the wrongly obtained monopoly profits that a brand-name manufacturer, Sanofi, obtained by improperly leveraging its improvement patent to impair generic market entry. This …

Keynote Address, Lina Mendoni

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article presents a compelling case for the repatriation of the Parthenon Sculptures to Greece, arguing that their removal by Lord Elgin was illegal, destructive, and morally unjustifiable. The Greek government asserts that the British Museum's continued possession violates both historical and contemporary legal standards, undermining cultural integrity and international ethical norms. The argument underscores the sculptures' intrinsic connection to Greece's cultural identity and the global community's growing support for their return.

Panel 2: Should The British Museum Return The Collection To Athens?, Michael Mccullough, Irini Stamatoudi, Elizabeth Marlowe, Kris Tytgat

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article challenges the notion that the Parthenon Marbles constitute a unique case for repatriation, arguing that this claim is both factually inaccurate and ethically problematic. It contends that framing the Parthenon Marbles as an exceptional case undermines broader efforts toward decolonization and restorative justice, as it dismisses solidarity with other formerly colonized nations seeking the return of their cultural heritage. The article advocates for a systematic approach to repatriation, emphasizing ethical obligations and the need for museums to adopt principles of restitution grounded in collaboration and equity.

From Exceptionalism To Solidarity: The Rhetoric Of The Case For The Parthenon Sculptures' Return, Elizabeth Marlowe

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article critiques the "exceptionalism" argument often used to justify keeping the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum, emphasizing their supposed uniqueness and the fear of setting a precedent for other repatriation claims. It argues that this approach is both factually and ethically flawed, as it ignores the broader ethical imperatives of decolonization and restorative justice. The author advocates for a shift towards solidarity with other repatriation movements, aligning with global efforts to address colonial legacies and promote ethical museum practices.

Sequencing In Damages, Edward K. Cheng, Ehud Guttel, Yuval Procaccia

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Tort law contains multiple doctrines governing the assignment of liability and the calculation of damages. But in what sequence should courts apply these doctrines? Does it matter, for example, whether a court applies comparative fault before or after mitigation of damages? The answer, rather surprisingly, is that sequencing does matter, and it can substantially affect the compensation that a tort victim ultimately receives. Yet the existing case law on sequencing is ad hoc, inconsistent, and undertheorized, and the issue has been entirely overlooked by the academic literature. In this Article, we introduce and examine the question of sequencing. We offer …

Cause For Concern Or Cause For Celebration?: Did Bostock V. Clayton County Establish A New Mixed Motive Theory For Title Vii Case And Make It Easier For Plaintiffs To Prove Discrimination Claims?, Terrence Cain

Seattle University Law Review

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee “because of” race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This seems simple enough, but if an employer makes an adverse employment decision partly for an impermissible reason and partly for a permissible reason, i.e., if the employer acts with a mixed motive, has the employer acted “because of” the impermissible reason? According to Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the answer is no. The Courts in Gross and Nassar held …

Kumble V. Voccola, 253 A.3d 1248 (R.I. 2021), Aryamen Andrew Omshehe

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Belmore V. Petterutti, 253 A.3d 864 (R.I. 2021), Whitney A. Saunders

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taking Misappropriation Seriously: State Common Law Disgorgement Actions For Insider Trading, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Articles

In two recent cases, Kokesh v. SEC, and Liu v. SEC, the U.S. Supreme Court cut back substantially on one of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s most important enforcement powers. This is the ability to seek disgorgement from persons who violate the federal securities laws, depriving them of their ill-gotten gains.

Previously, the Supreme Court had developed a largely property-based theory of insider trading. Why is insider trading evil? Because material nonpublic information is property that the trader has fraudulently obtained and must not use for his own purposes

In this article I bring these thoughts together. I …

Relying On Restatements, Shyamkrishna Balganesh

Faculty Scholarship

Restatements of the Law occupy a unique place in the Americanlegal system. For nearly a century, they have played a prominent and influential role as legal texts that courts routinely rely on in a wide variety of fields. Despite their ubiquitous and pervasive use by courts, Restatements are not formal sources of law. While they resemble statutes in their form and structure, Restatements are produced entirely by a private organization of experts set up to clarify and simplify the law and thus lack the force of law on their own. And yet, courts treat them as formal and authoritative sources …