How To Make Rules For Lawyers: The Professional Responsibility Of The Legal Profession,
2013
Pepperdine University
How To Make Rules For Lawyers: The Professional Responsibility Of The Legal Profession, Stephen Gillers
Pepperdine Law Review
When considering the professional responsibilities of American lawyers, two questions often arise: (1) whether a particular rule strikes the right balance among the multiple interests it purports to reconcile and (2) whether in a particular circumstance a lawyer's or law firm's behavior complied with the governing rules. This article explores a third question. What is the responsibility of the profession itself when, through its various institutions and especially bar associations, it asks courts, lawmakers, or agencies to adopt particular rules governing the conduct of lawyers? Rather than exploring the discussing the conduct of individual lawyers or the correctness of any …
The Lawyer Of The Future,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Lawyer Of The Future, Deanell Reece Tacha
Pepperdine Law Review
This piece introduces the Pepperdine Law Review symposium issue for Volume 40, publishing articles derived from the April 20, 2012 The Lawyer of the Future: Exploring the Impact of Past and Present Lawyers and the Lessons They Provide for Future Generations symposium, which explored the role of the lawyer in American society-past, present, and future.
The Case For "Higher Law",
2013
Pepperdine University
The Case For "Higher Law", John Warwick Montgomery
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vol. 44, No. 06 (February 18, 2013),
2013
Maurer School of Law: Indiana University
Amending For Justice’S Sake: Codified Disclosure Rule Needed To Provide Guidance To Prosecutor’S Duty To Disclose,
2013
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Amending For Justice’S Sake: Codified Disclosure Rule Needed To Provide Guidance To Prosecutor’S Duty To Disclose, Nathan A. Frazier
Florida Law Review
This Note argues for the implementation of bright-line rules to guide prosecutorial discretion. It urges a solution that identifies the salient facts from the case law and enumerates those facts into a codified Strickler three-prong standard. A bright-line standard should exist requiring disclosure when any of the following scenarios are present: (1) Prior perjury or false testimony of a government witness; (2) Promises of immunity to a government witness; (3) Monetary rewards to key government witnesses; (4) Mental impairments of a government witness; (5) Information reflecting bias or prejudice of a government witness against defendant; (6) Confessions to the crime …
Two Faces Of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) In Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago,
2013
George Mason University School of Law
Two Faces Of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) In Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago, Nelson Lund
Florida Law Review
Since the days of the Warren Court, conservatives have attacked “judicial activism.” Beginning with Judge Robert Bork’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, and lately with increasing frequency, liberals have sought to turn the tables. Critics now charge that conservative judges are activists, especially when they undermine liberal precedents or strike down liberal legislation. Defenders of judicial activism have all but disappeared. One sign of this apparent consensus is that all Supreme Court nominees now promise to be paragons of judicial restraint.
Some politicians and commentators have suggested that nominees are dissembling when they make such statements, and some of the sitting …
Evaluation Of Judicial Performance: A Tool For Self-Improvement,
2013
Pepperdine University
Evaluation Of Judicial Performance: A Tool For Self-Improvement, Richard L. Aynes
Pepperdine Law Review
The quality of our judicial system, like other institutions, is a function of the work performed by those who are afforded major roles in the dispensation of justice. Unmistakably. judges, jurors and lawyers assume key roles in this process. Professor Aynes, who is a member of the A.B.A.'s Evaluation of Judicial Performance Committee, recognizes that both judges and lawyers, unlike jurors, are professionals expected to bring more to the bench than honesty, good faith and diligence. The author observes that while efforts to improve the daily performance of attorneys have been well under way since the early 1970's, it i …
Lock In: Loved Ones And Lawyers,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
Lock In: Loved Ones And Lawyers, Robert M. Daines
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This convocation address was given at Stanford Law School on June 16, 2012.
Serve God, Love Me, And Mend,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
Serve God, Love Me, And Mend, Annette W. Jarvis
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This Honored Alumni Lecture was given at BYU Law School on October 23, 2010.
The Work Of Serving Others,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
The Work Of Serving Others, Carl S. Hawkins
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This address was given at BYU Law School on January 17, 1995.
He Answered Discreetly,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
He Answered Discreetly, L. Whitney Clayton
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This satellite fireside address was given to the J. Reuben Clark Law Society at the Conference Center Little Theater in Salt Lake City on January 27, 2012.
Ambiguity In Law And In Life,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
Ambiguity In Law And In Life, Bruce C. Hafen
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This address was given at BYU Law School on October 21, 2010. Adapted from The Broken Heart: Applying the Atonement to Life’s Experiences, expanded edition (2008), 211–226.
The Lawyer As Peacemaker,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
The Lawyer As Peacemaker, Matthew B. Durrant
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This J. Reuben Clark Law School convocation address was given at the Provo Tabernacle on April 25, 2008.
The Heart Of Lawyering: Clients, Empathy, And Compassion,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
The Heart Of Lawyering: Clients, Empathy, And Compassion, Kristin B. Gerdy
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
Adapted from “Clients, Empathy, and Compassion: Introducing First-Year Students to the ‘Heart’ of Lawyering,” Nebraska Law Review 87 (2008): 1–61.
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ Abuse Of Trust Enhancement: An Argument For The Professional Discretion Approach,
2013
University of Florida Levin College of Law
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ Abuse Of Trust Enhancement: An Argument For The Professional Discretion Approach, Adam Denver Griffin
Florida Law Review
This Note analyzes the prevalent judicial approaches to § 3B1.3 and explains how some courts erred by advancing the hybrid approach after the 1993 Amendment to § 3B1.3. Part II examines the role of trust in guideline sentencing. Part III discusses the policy behind the Guidelines, including the continuing application of the Guidelines despite the Supreme Court’s 2005 United States v. Booker decision. Part IV explains different approaches employed by the circuit courts to define a position of trust. Part V highlights the effect of the approach by contrasting the Third Circuit’s hybrid with the Eleventh Circuit’s professional discretion approach. …
Longitudinal Guilt: Repeat Offenders, Plea Bargaining, And The Variable Standard Of Proof,
2013
Georgia State University College of Law
Longitudinal Guilt: Repeat Offenders, Plea Bargaining, And The Variable Standard Of Proof, Russell D. Covey
Florida Law Review
This Article introduces a new concept—“longitudinal guilt”—which invites readers to reconsider basic presuppositions about the way our criminal justice system determines guilt in criminal cases. In short, the idea is that a variety of features of criminal procedure, most importantly, plea bargaining, conspire to change the primary “truthfinding mission” of criminal law from one of adjudicating individual historical cases to one of identifying dangerous “offenders.” This change of mission is visible in the lower proof standards we apply to repeat criminal offenders.
The first section of this Article explains how plea bargaining and graduated sentencing systems based on criminal history …
Sequencing The Issues For Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations From Jurisdictional Primacy And Intrasuit Preclusion,
2013
Cornell University
Sequencing The Issues For Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations From Jurisdictional Primacy And Intrasuit Preclusion, Kevin M. Clermont
Florida Law Review
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be very important, with a lot at stake for the court, society, and parties. Generally speaking, although the parties can control which issues they put before a judge, the judge gets to choose the decisional sequence in light of those various interests.
The law sees fit to put few limits on the judge’s power to sequence. The few limits are, in fact, quite narrow in application, and even narrower if properly understood. The Steel Co.-Ruhrgas rule generally requires a federal court to decide …
The Future Of Legal Education Reform,
2013
Washington and Lee University School of Law
The Future Of Legal Education Reform, James E. Moliterno
Scholarly Articles
The article discusses the criticism raised against legal education including high cost, disconnection between law schools and profession, and lack of employment opportunities. It examines the role of the bar examinations and reflects that the model in place is dysfunctional. It suggests that modern law school should teach students not only legal analysis but also business aspect of law practice such as project management and creative resolutions of disputes.
Greetings From Bloomington,
2013
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Greetings From Bloomington, Hannah Buxbaum
Hannah Buxbaum (2011-2013 Interim)
No abstract provided.
February 2013 Newsletter,
2013
Maurer School of Law: Indiana University
