A Jewish Perspective On Tom Shaffer: Zecher Tzadik Livracha (May The Memory Of The Righteous Be A Blessing),
2020
Fordham University School of Law
A Jewish Perspective On Tom Shaffer: Zecher Tzadik Livracha (May The Memory Of The Righteous Be A Blessing), Russell G. Pearce
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Tribute to Thomas L. Shaffer
Why Study Tax History?,
2020
University of Michigan Law
Why Study Tax History?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Reviews
Since the beginning of this century, John Tiley organized an annual tax history conference at Cambridge, a tradition that was continued after his death under the leadership of Peter Harris. These are the papers from the ninthCambridge Tax Law History Conference, held in July 2018. In the usual manner, the papers have been selected from an oversupply of proposals for their interest and relevance, and scrutinized and edited to the highest standard for inclusion in this prestigious series. The result is an outstanding book, with many high quality contributions to historical tax research.
Marshall Shapo's "Constitutional Tort" Fifty-Five Years Later,
2020
University of Georgia School of Law
Marshall Shapo's "Constitutional Tort" Fifty-Five Years Later, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
In 1965, Northwestern University Law Review published Professor Marshall Shapo’s article, Constitutional Tort: Monroe v. Pape and the Frontiers Beyond.1 Professor Shapo’s paper analyzed the origins of constitutional tort law, which consists of suits for damages for constitutional violations committed by government officials or the governments themselves. The article began with an account of the post-Civil War background of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statute enacted in 1871 to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. After the Civil War, recalcitrant southerners, acting through groups like the Ku Klux Klan, intimidated the freedmen and their white supporters, organized lynch mobs, burned houses, and, …
Glimpses Of Women At The Tokyo Tribunal,
2020
University of Georgia School of Law
Glimpses Of Women At The Tokyo Tribunal, Diane Marie Amann
Scholarly Works
Compared to its Nuremberg counterpart, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East has scarcely been visible in the seven decades since both tribunals’ inception. Recently the situation has changed, as publications of IMTFE documents have occurred alongside divers legal and historical writings, as well as two films and a miniseries. These new accounts give new visibility to the Tokyo Trial – or at least to the roles that men played at those trials. This essay identifies several of the women at Tokyo and explores roles they played there, with emphasis on lawyers and analysts for the prosecution and the …
First Women Lawyers In Rhode Island,
2020
Roger Williams University
First Women Lawyers In Rhode Island, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
#Livingwhileblack: Blackness As Nuisance,
2020
Rutgers University School of Law - Newark
#Livingwhileblack: Blackness As Nuisance, Taja-Nia Y. Henderson, Jamila Jefferson-Jones
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall’S Constitution: Methodological Pluralism And Second-Order Ipse Dixit In Constitutional Adjudication,
2020
Oklahoma City University School of Law; Georgetown University Law Center
John Marshall’S Constitution: Methodological Pluralism And Second-Order Ipse Dixit In Constitutional Adjudication, D.A. Jeremy Telman
Lewis & Clark Law Review
This Article provides a comprehensive treatment of the constitutional jurispru- dence of the Marshall Court (1801–1835), addressing its relationship to con- temporary originalism. Until recently, there seemed to be no need for such a study. With the move from intentionalism to textualism in the 1980s, originalists came to understand their movement as an innovation and a reac- tion against the perceived excesses of the Warren and Burger Courts. Original- ists did not claim that originalist methodology informed nineteenth-century constitutional adjudication.
Recently, however, originalists have made claims that constitutional adjudi- cation in the United States has always been originalist. This Article …
Against Progress: Interventions About Equality In Supreme Court Cases About Copyright Law,
2020
Boston University School of Law
Against Progress: Interventions About Equality In Supreme Court Cases About Copyright Law, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
This symposium essay is adapted from my forthcoming book Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age (Stanford University Press 2021 forthcoming). The book’s primary argument is that, with the rise of digital technology and the ubiquity of the internet, intellectual property law is becoming a mainstream part of law and culture. This mainstreaming of IP has particular effects, one of which is the surfacing of on-going debates about “progress of science and the useful arts,” which is the constitutional purpose of intellectual property rights.
In brief, Against Progress describes how in the 20th century intellectual property …
America's Amoral Constitution,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
America's Amoral Constitution, Richard Albert
American University Law Review
The celebrated United States Constitution does not derive its legitimacy from morality. Its legitimacy is rooted in an amoral code structured around the peculiar value of outcome-neutrality. By design, the Constitution does not evaluate whether a lawful choice is morally right or wrong; it evaluates only whether the choice satisfies the procedures the Constitution requires for it to have been made. What matters, then, is not the content of the choice. It is the very act of choosing. These fiercely democratic foundations serve as both the font of the Constitution’s popular legitimacy and more ominously the greatest threat to the …
Race, Rights, And The Representation Of Children,
2020
University of Minnesota Law School
Race, Rights, And The Representation Of Children, Barry Feld, Perry Moriearty
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Fiduciary Theory Of Prosecution,
2020
Fordham University School of Law
A Fiduciary Theory Of Prosecution, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Genius Of Hamilton And The Birth Of The Modern Theory Of The Judiciary,
2020
Georgetown University Law Center
The Genius Of Hamilton And The Birth Of The Modern Theory Of The Judiciary, William M. Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In late May 1788, with the essays of the Federalist on the Congress (Article I) and the Executive (Article II) completed, Alexander Hamilton turned, finally, to Article III and the judiciary. The Federalist’s essays 78 to 83 – the essays on the judiciary - had limited effect on ratification. No newspaper outside New York reprinted them, and they appeared very late in the ratification process – after eight states had ratified. But, if these essays had little immediate impact – essentially limited to the ratification debates in New York and, perhaps, Virginia – they were a stunning intellectual achievement. Modern …
The Patriation Of Canadian Corporate Law,
2020
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
The Patriation Of Canadian Corporate Law, Camden Hutchison
All Faculty Publications
Canadian corporate law belongs within a broader Anglo-American legal tradition, sharing many of the features of other common law jurisdictions, most notably England and the United States. Prior to Confederation, Canadian corporate law first emerged from nineteenth-century English legislation and continued to resemble English law – at least superficially – well into the twentieth century. Legislation is only one source of corporate law, however. Just as important is the creation of legal rules through the common law adjudicatory process. Thus, examining case law raises an important empirical question distinct from, though relevant to, the issue of legislative influence – namely, …
The Rohingya Genocide,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
The Rohingya Genocide, Paul Williams, Todd F. Buchwald, Jenny Domino, Rebecca Hamilton, Michael P. Scharf, Meilena Sterio
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Sdlp After 20: Sustainable Development In The Anthropocene,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Sdlp After 20: Sustainable Development In The Anthropocene, David Hunter
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Inter-American Commission On Human Rights' Observer At The Amia Bombing Trial,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Inter-American Commission On Human Rights' Observer At The Amia Bombing Trial, Claudio Grossman
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Conquest And Slavery In The Property Law Course: Notes For Teachers,
2020
Georgetown University Law Center
Conquest And Slavery In The Property Law Course: Notes For Teachers, K-Sue Park
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This piece contains ideas for teaching about the foundational place of the histories of conquest and slavery to American property law and the property law course. I begin by briefly reviewing how these topics have been erased and marginalized from the study of American property law, as mentioned by casebooks in the field published from the late nineteenth century to the present. I then show how the history of conquest constituted the context in which the singular American land system and traditional theories of acquisition developed, before turning to the history of the American slave trade and the long history …
Copyright As Legal Process: The Transformation Of American Copyright Law,
2020
Columbia Law School
Copyright As Legal Process: The Transformation Of American Copyright Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Faculty Scholarship
American copyright law has undergone an unappreciated conceptual transformation over the course of the last century. Originally conceived of as a form of private law – focusing on horizontal rights, privileges and private liability – copyright law is today understood principally through its public-regarding goals and institutional apparatus, in effect as a form of public law. This transformation is the result of changes in the ideas of law and law-making that occurred in American legal thinking following World War II, manifested in the deeply influential philosophy of the Legal Process School of jurisprudence which shaped the modern American copyright landscape. …
Three Keys To The Original Meaning Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause,
2020
Georgetown University Law Center
Three Keys To The Original Meaning Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Randy E. Barnett
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Establishing the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause requires a wealth of evidence. But three key data points are crucial to identifying the core of its meaning. First, Supreme Court Justice Washington’s explanation of the meaning of “privileges and immunities” in Corfield v. Coryell; second, the rights protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1866; and third, Michigan Senator Jacob Howard’s speech explaining the content of the Privileges or Immunities Clause when introducing the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Senate in 1866. Any theory of the Privileges or Immunities Clause and its original meaning …
Transfixed In The Camera's Gaze: Foster V. Svenson And The Battle Of Privacy And Modern Art,
2020
New York Law School
Transfixed In The Camera's Gaze: Foster V. Svenson And The Battle Of Privacy And Modern Art, Michael Goodyear
Articles & Chapters
The battle between First Amendment expression and privacy interests in twenty-first century America is in full force. In Foster v. Svenson, a photographer used a high-powered camera to take snapshots of his neighbors. The New York court ruled that it was art and therefore immune from New York’s privacy statute. Constrained by New York’s ineffective privacy statute, the court’s ruling included a cry for the New York legislature to act.
Privacy has become an increasingly powerful right in American law, especially with the growth of technology. Yet the problem with Foster and the New York statute is that the sole …
