Rwanda And The Kigali International Arbitration Centre: The Future Faces Of East African Arbitration And Growth,
2017
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Rwanda And The Kigali International Arbitration Centre: The Future Faces Of East African Arbitration And Growth, Jeremy Cantor
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Part I is a brief introduction to the Note. Part II is a brief background of Rwandan history and the country's push for economic growth. Furthermore, Part II elaborates on the history, the current status of Rwanda's judicial system, and on the KIAC. Part III explains why arbitration is fitting for Africa as a whole and why it is more fitting for East Africa specifically. In particular, the Note explains why Kigali is the proper choice of seat6 and KIAC the proper institution, and analyzes certain problems preventing the growth of African arbitration. Lastly, Part IV proposes how to effectuate …
Trade Association, State Building, And The Sherman Act: The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce, 1912-25,
2017
University of Georgia School of Law
Trade Association, State Building, And The Sherman Act: The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce, 1912-25, Laura Phillips Sawyer
Scholarly Works
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce (USCC), and "organization of organizations," was conceived in 1912 in coordination with administrators at the Department of Commerce and Labor to promote the collection of commercially valuable trade information. A critical though often neglected, aspect of administrative state building has been the information-gathering and dissemination practices spearheaded by the Department of Commerce and later the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in conjunction with the USCC. Rather than a strictly adversarial relationship, in the early twentieth century business-government relations created mutually constitutive administrative capacities in both private trade associations and public administrative agencies.
Unlawful Assembly As Social Control,
2017
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Unlawful Assembly As Social Control, John D. Inazu
Scholarship@WashULaw
Recent public protests from Occupy to Ferguson have highlighted anew the offense of unlawful assembly. This Article advances the simple but important thesis that contemporary approaches to unlawful assembly cede too much discretion to law enforcement. Too many unlawful assembly provisions neglect important elements of earlier statutory formulations. They also ignore constitutional principles meant to constrain the scope and extent of discretionary enforcement of social control by public authorities. In doing so, they fall short of the aspirations of the First Amendment — stifling dissent, muting expression, and ultimately weakening the democratic experiment. We can do better. We can start …
Business Income And Business Taxation In The United States Since The 1950s,
2017
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Business Income And Business Taxation In The United States Since The 1950s, Conor Clarke, Wojciech Kopczuk
Scholarship@WashULaw
In theory, the U.S. tax system aims to attribute and tax all business income to individuals. But the tax treatment of this income varies. Pass-through income is taxed when earned; capital-gains income is taxed when realized; dividends when distributed; other forms of business income may escape taxation entirely. Business owners often have control over the timing and character of their income: They can often choose, for example, between reporting business income or deducting it as wages or fringe benefits. And laws change, changing the incentive and ability to shift income between the individual and corporate sectors.We integrate a wide variety …
The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers And The Remaking Of American Government (Book Review),
2017
St. Mary's University School of Law
The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers And The Remaking Of American Government (Book Review), Michael Ariens
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
What Changes In American Constitutional Law And What Does Not,
2017
New York Law School
What Changes In American Constitutional Law And What Does Not, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Panel 2: Comic Book Jurisprudence With Q&A,
2017
Berger Books
Panel 2: Comic Book Jurisprudence With Q&A, Karen Berger, Lillian Laserson, Paul Levitz, Robert Sikoryak, Brett Frischmann
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Toward A History Of The Democratic State,
2017
University of Michigan Law School
Toward A History Of The Democratic State, William J. Novak, Stephen W. Sawyer, James T. Sparrow
Articles
Over the past generation, the history of the state has been experiencing a much-noted renaissance, especially in France and the United States. In the United States as late as 1986, Morton Keller complained to William Leuchtenburg in the Journal of American History: “To say that ‘there is much still to be learned about the nature of the State in America’ is … a major understatement. There is close to everything to be learned about the State.” In France as late as 1990, Pierre Rosanvallon’s powerful introduction to L’État en France suggested that an ambitious history of the state could not …
One Country, Two Systems: Hong Kong's Unique Status And The Development And Growth Of Arbitration In China,
2017
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
One Country, Two Systems: Hong Kong's Unique Status And The Development And Growth Of Arbitration In China, Jiali (Keli) Huang
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note evaluates the future of arbitration in China and Hong Kong as the two approach their twentieth year working toward reunification under the implications of the "one country, two systems" model, which was implemented in Hong Kong when Hong Kong's sovereignty was transferred back to China in 1997. First, this Note explains Hong Kong's unique identity, the factors that triggered the Umbrella Movement and the Fishball Revolution, and Hong Kong's current relationship with China. Second, this Note provides a broad overview of the development of arbitration in China. Third, this Note describes the arbitral history between China and Hong …
Fear And Firearms,
2017
Duke Law School
Is Miranda Good News Or Bad News For The Police: The Usefulness Of Empirical Evidence,
2017
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Is Miranda Good News Or Bad News For The Police: The Usefulness Of Empirical Evidence, Meghan J. Ryan
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona created a culture in which police officers regularly warn arrestees that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law, that they have the right to an attorney, and that if they cannot afford one, an attorney will be appointed to them. These Miranda warnings have a number of possible effects. The warnings are meant to inform suspects about negative consequences associated with speaking to the police without the assistance of counsel. In this sense they …
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today,
2017
University of Colorado Law School
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
The modern class action rule recently turned fifty years old — a golden anniversary. However, this milestone is marred by an increase in hate crimes, violence and discrimination. Ironically, the rule is marking its anniversary within a similarly tumultuous environment as its birth — the civil rights movement of the 1960’s. This irony calls into question whether this critical aggregation device is functioning as the drafters intended. This article makes three contributions.
First, the article unearths the rule’s rich history, revealing how the rule was designed in 1966 to enable structural reform and broad injunctive relief in civil rights cases. …
Class Actions, Civil Rights, And The National Injunction,
2017
University of Colorado Law School
Class Actions, Civil Rights, And The National Injunction, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
This essay is a response to Professor Samuel Bray’s article proposing a blanket prohibition against injunctions that enjoin a defendant’s conduct with respect to nonparties. He argues that national injunctions are illegitimate under Article III and traditional equity and result in a number of difficulties.
This Response argues, from a normative lens, that Bray’s proposed ban on national injunctions should be rejected. Such a bright-line rule against national injunctions is too blunt an instrument to address the complexity of our tripartite system of government, our pluralistic society and our democracy. Although national injunctions may be imperfect and crude forms of …
Book Review,
2017
University of Colorado Law School
Book Review Of Law And The Modern Mind: Consciousness And Responsibility In American Legal Culture,
2017
New York Law School
Book Review Of Law And The Modern Mind: Consciousness And Responsibility In American Legal Culture, Edward A. Purcell Jr
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act,
2017
Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom LLP
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act, Jesús N. Joslin
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
¡Que Viva The Scholar!,
2017
St. Mary's University, Texas
¡Que Viva The Scholar!, Bill Piatt
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Principle And Politics In The New History Of Originalism,
2017
University of Georgia
Principle And Politics In The New History Of Originalism, Logan E. Sawyer Iii
Scholarly Works
The emergence of a new form of originalism has sparked an interest in the theory’s past that is particularly welcome as developments on the Supreme Court and in the Republican Party unsettle the theory’s place in American law and politics. Our understanding of the theory’s development, however, has been limited by an unfortunate and unnecessary division between what are now two separate histories of originalism. One history examines the theory’s development in academia and emphasizes the influence of principled argument. A second investigates its role in politics and highlights the role of conservative interests. This review essay identifies this division …
The Presumptions Of Classical Liberal Constitutionalism,
2017
University of Baltimore Law
The Presumptions Of Classical Liberal Constitutionalism, Matthew J. Lindsay
All Faculty Scholarship
Richard A. Epstein’s The Classical Liberal Constitution is an imposing addition to the burgeoning body of legal scholarship that seeks to “restore” a robust conception of economic liberty and limited government to its rightful place at the center of American constitutionalism. Legislators and judges operating within a “classical liberal conception of government,” Epstein explains, would approach skeptically “[a]ll [regulatory] proposals that deviate from the basic common law protections of life, liberty, and property.” Classical liberal constitutional courts would thus renounce the toothless rational basis review of the post-New Deal “progressive mindset,” and instead subject to exacting scrutiny the government’s “purported …
The Italian Enlightenment And The American Revolution: Cesare Beccaria's Forgotten Influence On American Law,
2017
University of Baltimore School of Law
The Italian Enlightenment And The American Revolution: Cesare Beccaria's Forgotten Influence On American Law, John Bessler
All Faculty Scholarship
The influence of the Italian Enlightenment—the Illuminismo—on the American Revolution has long been neglected. While historians regularly acknowledge the influence of European thinkers such as William Blackstone, John Locke and Montesquieu, Cesare Beccaria’s contributions to the origins and development of American law have largely been forgotten by twenty-first century Americans. In fact, Beccaria’s book, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764), translated into English as On Crimes and Punishments (1767), significantly shaped the views of American revolutionaries and lawmakers. The first four U.S. Presidents—George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison—were inspired by Beccaria’s treatise and, in some cases, read …
