Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons^™

Ties That Do Not Bind: The Rules That Keep Lawyers And Accountants Separate, Lawrence A. Wesco

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Chilling Effect Of Ag-Gag Laws On Unexpected Parties & The Free Market, Samantha Darnell

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Electric Transmission Lines As A Gateway To Renewable Energy: The “Power” Rests With The States, Luke Franz

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

A Real Options Analysis Of Pleading Standards, Chris Bach

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Evading Jurisdiction: How To Hold Burundi Accountable For Human Rights Violations After Withdrawal From The International Criminal Court, Katherine Lessing

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Scrutiny Of Natural Gas Storage: Why Taxing Temporarily Stored Natural Gas On Its Interstate Journey Offends The Commerce Clause, Kyle Mason

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Regulating Prosecutors’ Courtroom Misconduct, Bruce A. Green

Faculty Scholarship

Trial prosecutors’ visible misbehavior, such as improper questioning of witnesses and improper jury arguments, may not seem momentous. Sometimes, the improprieties are simply the product of poor training or overenthusiasm. In many cases, they pass unremarked. As the Chicago Eight trial illustrated, trial prosecutors’ improprieties may also be overshadowed by the excesses of other trial participants—the witnesses, the defendants, the defense lawyers, or even the trial judge. And when noticed, prosecutors’ trial misbehavior can ordinarily be remedied, and then restrained, by a capable trial judge. It is little wonder that disciplinary authorities, having bigger fish to fry, are virtually indifferent …

Between Brady Discretion And Brady Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

The Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland presented prosecutors with new professional challenges. In Brady, the Supreme Court held that the prosecution must provide the defense with any evidence in its possession that could be exculpatory. If the prosecution fails to timely turn over evidence that materially undermines the defendant’s guilt, a reviewing court must grant the defendant a new trial. While determining whether evidence materially undermines a defendant’s guilt may seem like a simple assessment, the real-life application of such a determination can be complicated. The prosecution’s disclosure determination can be complicated under the Brady paradigm because the …

Doing Justice: Judging And Jewish Values, Judith Bartnoff

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cannabis Law, The Constitution, And The Aba Model Rules, Hayley Hollis

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Though a growing number of states have legalized recreational or medical cannabis use, cannabis is still categorized as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act, and its use, possession, and cultivation are federal offenses. This conflict between state and federal law creates a unique challenge for the legal community. Unless states with legalized cannabis programs have amended their state rules of professional conduct or provided advisory opinions on the matter, local attorneys assume a great deal of risk when representing clients within the cannabis industry.

To further complicate matters, what happens when a lawyer, who is licensed to …

Rudolph Giuliani And The Ethics Of Bullshit, Bennett L. Gershman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Lawyers are communicators. They communicate with clients, courts, adversaries, juries, witnesses, and the public. Lawyers have a special responsibility for the quality of justice. Their communications, therefore, are hedged by various ethical rules to ensure that their statements are knowledgeable, truthful, respectful, and not prejudicial to the administration of justice. But lawyers are not always knowledgeable of the facts. In fact, they sometimes behave disrespectfully, and stray from the truth. False statements by lawyers may be made unwittingly, sometimes intentionally, and sometimes with an indifference, even a contempt for the truth. Discourse of the latter kind may be characterized as …

"You Have The Data"...The Writ Of Habeas Data And Other Data Protection Rights: Is The United States Falling Behind?, Sarah L. Lode

Indiana Law Journal

In Part I of this Note, I will discuss the writ of habeas data that has been developed primarily, but not exclusively, in Latin American countries. I will discuss the intricacies of the writ, how it evolved, and how it is applied today. Using Argentina as an example, I will discuss how the writ would be used by an Argentine citizen to protect her personal data. Part II summarizes the previously employed data protection scheme in the European Union, the Data Protection Directive (“the Directive”), and will also discuss the new EU data protection regulation, the General Data Protection Regulation …

Lead Us Not Into Temptation: A Response To Barbara Fedders’S “Opioid Policing”, Anna Roberts

Indiana Law Journal

In “Opioid Policing,”1 Barbara Fedders contributes to the law review literature the first joint scholarly analysis of two drug policing innovations: Seattle’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program and the Angel Initiative, which originated in Gloucester, Massachusetts. Even while welcoming the innovation and inspiration of these programs, she remains clear-eyed about the need to scrutinize their potential downsides. Her work is crucially timed. While still just a few years old, LEAD has been replicated many times2 and appears likely to be replicated still further—and to be written about much more. Inspired by Fedders’s call for a balanced take, this Response …

Professional Liability, Evan A. Kirkham, Cara D. Little, Hayden M. Baker

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Relationships And Ethics In The Land Use Game, Patricia E. Salkin, Thomas Brown, Aisha Scholes

Scholarly Works

Ethical considerations in the land use decision making process can be organized into a number of categories, including, first and foremost, the broad subject of conflicts of interest.1 Players in the land use game can find themselves in real or perceived conflicts situations based on personal financial interests resulting from investments, including businesses and real estate holdings (such as the location of their property vis-à-vis the location of the subject property before the Board), employment for themselves or members of their immediate family, and memberships in nonprofit organizations that may be either passive or active (e.g., simply dues paying member …

Myth Of The Attorney Whistleblower, Carliss N. Chatman

SMU Law Review

Notwithstanding the political grandstanding and legal regimes put in place to prevent the next Enron, this article explores whether attorney whistleblower provisions provided in the Standards of Professional Con- duct for Attorneys Appearing and Practicing Before the Commission in the Representation of an Issuer and in the Model Rules of Professional Con- duct are effective. When faced with attorney involvement in Enron, Congress passed § 307 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Sarbanes), which required the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to amend its standards governing the conduct of attorneys practicing before the SEC. In response, the SEC and the American …

Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Warren Court’S Pursuit Of Kant’S Realm Of Ends, Daniel Feldman

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Aba Model Rule 8.4(G) In The States, Josh Blackman

Catholic University Law Review

This essay will provide a brief overview of how the states have responded to

ABA Model Rule 8.4(g). Part I reviews opinions from four state attorneys

general who concluded that the rule is unconstitutional: Texas, South Carolina,

Louisiana, and Tennessee. Part II discusses the states that considered the rule

with modifications. Part III reviews the states that considered Rule 8.4(g) as

drafted. So far, only one state adopted the rule: Vermont. However, the process

is still not over, and other states are currently considering the rule.

Advising The Smart City: When Artificial Intelligence And Big Data Are The Subject Of Professional Advice, What Is A Government Lawyer To Do?, Jamila Jefferson-Jones

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.