Contesting Property Rights: Towards An Integrated Theory Of Institutional And System Change,
2011
Columbia Law Review
Contesting Property Rights: Towards An Integrated Theory Of Institutional And System Change, Katharina Pistor
Faculty Scholarship
It is widely recognized that institutions are embedded in social systems and that institutions as well as social systems change over time. Several implications follow: First, institutions cannot be described and analyzed without referring to the system in which they operate; conversely, a system cannot be described without reference to its core institutions. Second, systems foster institutional change and can breed new institutions. Third, institutional change can have systemic implications and may even engender the formation of new systems. In short, the relation between institutions and systems is characterized by complex interactions. A better understanding of the dynamics of institutional …
Purple Haze,
2011
Columbia Law School
Purple Haze, Clare Huntington
Faculty Scholarship
It takes only a glance at the headlines every political season – with battles over issues ranging from abortion and abstinence-only education to same-sex marriage and single parenthood – to see that the culture wars have become a fixed feature of the American political landscape. The real puzzle is why these divides continue to resonate so powerfully. In Red Families v. Blue Families: Legal Polarization and the Creation of Culture, Naomi Cahn and June Carbone offer an ambitious addition to our understanding of this puzzle, illustrating pointedly why it is so hard to talk across the political divide. In a …
Twenty Years Of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back To Move Forward,
2011
Columbia Law School
Twenty Years Of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back To Move Forward, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw
Faculty Scholarship
This Article revisits the history of Critical Race Theory (CRT) through a prism that highlights its historical articulation in light of the emergence of postracialism. The Article will explore two central inquiries. This first query attends to the specific contours of law as the site out of which CRT emerged. The Article hypothesizes that legal discourse presented a particularly legible template from which to demystify the role of reason and the rule of law in upholding the racial order. The second objective is to explore the contemporary significance of CRT's trajectory in light of today's "post-racial" milieu. The Article posits …
Radical Thought From Marx, Nietzsche, And Freud, Through Foucault, To The Present: Comments On Steven Lukes’S In Defense Of "False Consciousness",
2011
Columbia Law School
Radical Thought From Marx, Nietzsche, And Freud, Through Foucault, To The Present: Comments On Steven Lukes’S In Defense Of "False Consciousness", Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
Steven Lukes offers a precise, succinct, and forceful defense of the idea of "false consciousness" in his provocative essay by that name, In Defense of "False Consciousness" People can be systematically mistaken about their own best interest, Lukes contends – or, in his words, "they can have systematically distorted beliefs about the social order and their own place in it that work systematically against their interests." It is not just that sometimes people knowingly but regretfully make compromises, nor simply that they face no alternative choices; people are at times factually mistaken about what will promote their best interest. "There …
Between Liberalism And Theocracy,
2011
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Between Liberalism And Theocracy, John D. Inazu
Scholarship@WashULaw
Our symposium conveners have focused us on “the relationship between liberalism and Christianity and their influence on American constitutionalism.” My objective is to complicate the relationship and reorient the influence. The focus of my inquiry is the liberty of conscience and its implications for the relationship between church and state. By approaching these issues through the lens of political theology (as distinct from either political or constitutional theory), hope to show that some of the most significant embodiments of conscience in the American colonies can neither be squared with an individualistic liberalism (as some on the left are prone to …
Rationing Justice By Rationing Lawyers,
2011
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Rationing Justice By Rationing Lawyers, Peter A. Joy
Scholarship@WashULaw
The number of lawyers in the United States continues to increase, but low and middle-income persons still find it difficult, if not impossible, to afford legal assistance. National and state surveys reveal that more than 80 percent of the civil legal needs of the poor go unmet, as do a majority of the needs of middle-income persons. Legal representation can often dramatically increase a person’s ability to win at trial or to negotiate a favorable outcome, and the lack of access to lawyers effectively closes the courthouse doors for millions. This Article focuses on the crisis in Missouri's public defender …
The Law Of The Census: How To Count, What To Count, Whom To Count, And Where To Count Them,
2011
Columbia Law School
The Law Of The Census: How To Count, What To Count, Whom To Count, And Where To Count Them, Nathaniel Persily
Cardozo Law Review
The 2010 Census, like its predecessors, represented a momentous logistical and technological undertaking with far reaching consequences for political representation and allocation of public resources. It also promised to spawn a series of legal controversies over how to count people, what information the government should gather, which individuals truly "count" for purposes of the census, and where they should be counted. This Article explores these present and past controversies surrounding the census. The issues of "sampling" and "statistical adjustment" pervaded much of the legal commentary and caselaw concerning the census for the past twenty years. The undercount will continue to …
Is The "Post" In Post-Racial The "Blind" In Colorblind?,
2011
University of California, Berkeley
Is The "Post" In Post-Racial The "Blind" In Colorblind?, Ian F. Haney López
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Activism And The Interpretation Of The Voting Rights Act,
2011
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Judicial Activism And The Interpretation Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Racial Proxies: Resurgent State And Local Anti-"Alien" Laws And Unity-Rebuilding Frames For Antidiscrimination Values,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
Post-Racial Proxies: Resurgent State And Local Anti-"Alien" Laws And Unity-Rebuilding Frames For Antidiscrimination Values, Mary D. Fan
Cardozo Law Review
Though unauthorized migration into the United States has diminished substantially since 2007, anti-"illegal alien" state and local laws and furor are flaring again. While one of the biggest worries regarding such "anti-alien" laws is the risk of racialized harm, courts invalidating overreaching statutes are relying on structural or procedural grounds, such as preemption and due process doctrines. This Article examines how these political and legal trends point to how proxies are used in a post-racial era to dance around race, in constructive, national unity-rebuilding as well as divisive, inflammatory ways. Anti-alien legislation is a proxy way to vent resurgent racialized …
Legal Culture,
2011
Duke Law School
Legal Culture, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
Written for an encyclopedia on European private law, this brief
article addresses the term legal culture, the relation between law and
culture, the relevance of legal culture, legal culture in the national
and European context, and criticism of the concept.
Peaceful Penetration: Proxy Marriage, Same-Sex Marriage, And Recognition,
2011
Duke Law School
Peaceful Penetration: Proxy Marriage, Same-Sex Marriage, And Recognition, Kerry Abrams
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Bob Dylan On Lenny Bruce: More Of An Outlaw Than You Ever Were,
2011
Touro Law Center
Bob Dylan On Lenny Bruce: More Of An Outlaw Than You Ever Were, Louise Harmon
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Bob Dylan And The Law, Foreword,
2011
Touro Law Center
Symposium: Bob Dylan And The Law, Foreword, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination,
2011
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) from a social psychological perspective, and empirically studies Iqbal’s effect on claims of race discrimination.
In Twombly and then Iqbal, the Court recast Rule 8 from a notice-based rule into a plausibility standard. Under Iqbal, federal judges must evaluate whether each complaint contains sufficient factual matter “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” When doing so, Iqbal requires judges to draw on their “judicial experience and common sense.” Courts apply Iqbal at the pleading stage, before evidence has been …
Dec. 10, 2010, Ifc Performance Standards_V2,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Dec. 10, 2010, Ifc Performance Standards_V2, Ifc
IFC E&S Performance Standards
No abstract provided.
Dec. 1, 2010, Ifc, Policy On Soc. And Environmental Sustainability _V2,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Dec. 1, 2010, Ifc, Policy On Soc. And Environmental Sustainability _V2, Ifc
IFC E&S Performance Standards
No abstract provided.
Jerome Frank And The Modern Mind,
2010
University of Virginia
Jerome Frank And The Modern Mind, Charles L. Barzun
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cheaters Shouldn't Prosper And Consumers Shouldn't Suffer: The Need For Government Enforcement Against Economic Adulteration Of 100% Pomegranate Juice And Other Imported Food Products,
2010
University of California, Los Angeles
Cheaters Shouldn't Prosper And Consumers Shouldn't Suffer: The Need For Government Enforcement Against Economic Adulteration Of 100% Pomegranate Juice And Other Imported Food Products, Michael T. Roberts
Journal of Food Law & Policy
In the modern global food system - marked by the trade flow of a variety of food products and ingredients from multiple locations in the world - economically motivated adulteration has emerged as a growing menace that threatens the health and wellbeing of consumers, the economic livelihoods of honest purveyors of food in the global marketplace, and the integrity and viability of national food regulatory systems. Economic adulteration is a form of cheating that includes the padding, diluting, and substituting of food product. Although this cheating is rooted in past food systems, the new paradigm for economic adulteration - a …
European Union Food Law Update,
2010
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
European Union Food Law Update, Emilie H. Leibovitch
Journal of Food Law & Policy
This EU Food Law Update will focus on the recent developments in the areas of genetically modified organisms, novel foods, feed safety, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, salmonella and food borne diseases, food additives, organic farming, food contact materials, and labeling.
